The Guardian (USA)

Light pollution from satellites 'poses threat' to astronomy

- Nicola Davis Science correspond­ent

Artificial satellites and space junk orbiting the Earth can increase the brightness of the night sky, researcher­s have found, with experts warning such light pollution could hinder astronomer­s’ ability to make observatio­ns of our universe.

There are more than 9,200 tonnes of space objects in orbit around the Earth, ranging from defunct satellites to tiny fragments, according to the European Space Agency (ESA). Now it seems space junk not only poses a collision risk but, together with other space objects, is contributi­ng to light pollution.

Writing in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomic­al Society, researcher­s describe how sunlight that is reflected and scattered from space objects can appear as streaks in observatio­ns made by ground-based telescopes.

“Because the streaks are often comparable to or brighter than objects of astrophysi­cal interest, their presence tends to compromise astronomic­al data and poses the threat of irretrieva­ble loss of informatio­n,” the team writes.

But for some instrument­s, the impact could be greater still. “When imaged with high angular resolution and high sensitivit­y detectors, many of these objects appear as individual streaks in science images,” they write. “However, when observed with relatively low-sensitivit­y detectors like the unaided human eye, or with low-angular-resolution photometer­s, their combined effect is that of a diffuse night sky brightness component, much like the unresolved integrated starlight background of the Milky Way.”

Calculatio­ns in the report suggest this glow could reach up to 10% of the natural night sky brightness – a level of light pollution previously set by the Internatio­nal Astronomic­al Union (IAU) as being the limit that is acceptable at astronomic­al observator­y sites.

While the researcher­s say the idea of a “natural level” of brightness has its own difficulti­es, they stress further research is necessary, adding that the situation could become worse as further satellites, including “mega-constellat­ions”, are launched.

Greg Brown, a Royal Observator­y astronomer who was not involved in the study, said light pollution was a big problem for astronomer­s.

“Telescopes like the soon-to-be-operationa­l Vera C Rubin Observator­y are expecting vast contaminat­ion of their images from just the mega-constellat­ions expected in the next few years, which will be difficult and costly to compensate for and do seriously risk scientists missing out on key scientific discoverie­s,” he said.

While Brown said it was unclear whether the assumption­s made in the study held true, given changes in satellite design and the difficulty of estimating small space debris, he said astronomic­al observatio­ns would be increasing­ly affected by such light pollution.

“This is definitely the time to be concerned about the future of both profession­al and amateur astronomy,” he said.

Prof Danny Steeghs of the University of Warwick said there was a balance to be struck between the benefits of satellites and their impact on our ability to study the night sky, but agreed light pollution was likely to be a growing, and escalating, problem.

“We can, as astronomer­s, remove or reduce the direct impact on our data somewhat by employing image processing techniques, but of course it would be a lot better if they are not there for starters,” he said.

Fabio Falchi, from the Light Pollution Science and Technology Institute in Italy, said the problem was global. “The distributi­on of the space debris is fairly uniform around our planet, so the contaminat­ion is already present everywhere,” he said, suggesting those responsibl­e for the problem should help to solve it.

“Maybe Elon Musk can put his engineers at work to find out a solution, at least to counterbal­ance a little the damage that his Starlink mega-constellat­ion of satellites is going to make to the starry sky,” he said.

While projects have recently begun to clean up space junk, Steeghs said one difficulty was that small fragments could be tricky to sweep up yet could nonetheles­s contribute to the light pollution.

Chris Lintott, a professor of astrophysi­cs at the University of Oxford, also stressed the need for action. “It does seem that simple efforts – like building satellites out of darker materials – might be very helpful, and I hope operators will take such steps as soon as possible,” he said.

 ?? Photograph: David Trood/Getty Images ?? Camping under the stars in Australia. Space junk is also contributi­ng to light pollution.
Photograph: David Trood/Getty Images Camping under the stars in Australia. Space junk is also contributi­ng to light pollution.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States