The Guardian (USA)

Democratic senator Tina Smith: 'I'd vote to get rid of the filibuster hook, line and sinker'

- Daniel Strauss in Washington

It’s rare a federal lawmaker makes a complete about-face on an issue with major legislativ­e consequenc­es. But for Senator Tina Smith of Minnesota, the need to shift her position on one of the most crucial issues facing the Biden administra­tion – reform of the filibuster rule – has become too strong to ignore.

She now believes that without reform, the filibuster – a rule by which the minority party in the Senate can block legislatio­n – will do serious “damage” to American democracy, she told the Guardian.

Smith’s move is crucial. Behind the loud voices of the Senate Democratic caucus calling to either dramatical­ly scale back or gut entirely a tool used to obstruct legislatio­n, there’s a usually quieter set of senators, like Smith, who are finally speaking out. They’ve had enough, these senators say, and want to see a substantia­l change to the filibuster – either workaround­s for certain legislativ­e proposals like voting rights, or modificati­ons so the threat of a filibuster doesn’t bring Congress to a standstill.

Senator Angus King of Maine, in a recent op-ed, laid out his shift on the filibuster. Similarly, Smith laid out her own rationale for coming around on some kind of major change on the filibuster. Smith, a former lieutenant governor of Minnesota who came to the

Senate via an appointmen­t from then governor Mark Dayton in 2018, initially saw value in it. That has changed.

In an interview with the Guardian,

Smith argued that contrary to how the filibuster is portrayed by its advocates – as a tool to make the minority heard – it simply gives a minority of lawmakers outsized power.

“I often thought that it’s important that the minority view is heard in the Senate, and that there should be an opportunit­y for people to come together across lines of difference to get things done. But that wasn’t happening either,” Smith said.

“The filibuster wasn’t encouragin­g compromise. The filibuster was making it easy for any member of the Senate to say no. And the more I looked at that, the more I looked at the damage it was doing to our democracy.”

She added: “The more I realized this is so undemocrat­ic, and [that] every other governing body I’ve ever worked with has fundamenta­lly operated on the rule that the majority gets to decide, I came to the conclusion that the filibuster was contributi­ng to a broken Senate.”

Smith’s comments come as Republican senators go in the opposite direction from Democrats on the filibuster.

Top Senate Republican­s have

 ??  ?? Tina Smith: ‘The filibuster wasn’t encouragin­g compromise. The filibuster was making it easy for any member of the Senate to say no.’ Photograph: Zach Gibson/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Tina Smith: ‘The filibuster wasn’t encouragin­g compromise. The filibuster was making it easy for any member of the Senate to say no.’ Photograph: Zach Gibson/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States