The Guardian (USA)

US domestic travelers could choose lowemissio­n flights – if data was available

- Katharine Gammon

Commercial flying is a real carbon bomb as emissions from commercial aviation are growing rapidly and are on track to triple by 2050, when they could make up about a quarter of the global carbon budget.

But now a new study shows how people could reduce their emissions while still flying on airplanes, if they were able to choose the most carbonfrie­ndly routes.

The research paper looked at potential ways to reduce the burden of flying. Researcher­s at the Internatio­nal Council on Clean Transporta­tion analyzed the carbon footprints of the 20 most popular US domestic plane routes in 2019. It finds that on average, the leastemitt­ing itinerary on a route can emit 63% less carbon dioxide than the mostemitti­ng option, and 22% less than the route average.

“The wide emissions gaps point to potentiall­y significan­t climate benefits in encouragin­g consumers to choose the lowest-emitting flights,” the authors write. The problem is that it’s not always easy to identify which routes create the fewest emissions.

In general, flying direct and on newer aircraft can help a consumer choose less-emitting flights, but not always, the researcher­s say. Other variables, including load factor and seating configurat­ion, also affect the carbon intensity of a trip. Single-aisle, mainline aircraft or turboprops generally have lower emissions than regional jets, although relative airline fuel efficiency performanc­e varies across routes.

Some carriers are more fuel-efficient than others, but the paper shows that no single airline operated lowemittin­g flights on all routes in 2019. Reporting emissions by itinerary would therefore help guide consumer decisions, they say.

Lower carbon doesn’t have to mean more expensive: on three-quarters of popular routes, the least emitting flight was also one of the cheapest, and a consumer could reduce emissions by up to 55% by choosing a ticket from within the cheapest 25% of fares. But it could force the flying public to part with their preferred air carrier brand: choosing the least emitting itinerary can be challengin­g for people who fly with a single carrier, particular­ly a full-service legacy carrier.

Some travel search engines like Google Flights, Kayak and Skyscanner have introduced “eco-flight filters” into their platforms, which label flights with lower than average emissions among all search results – but the absolute CO2 emissions for each itinerary are not

currently shown. That’s why making emissions data public would help consumers make informed decisions.

The researcher­s say flight-level emissions data is key to empowering consumers to reward carriers that invest in fuel efficiency and more sustainabl­e aviation fuels. Policymake­rs could help by requiring that airlines disclose emissions by flight and requiring audits to ensure the accuracy of reported data. “Once in place, climateinf­ormed consumer choices could accelerate the decarboniz­ation of air travel,” the researcher­s write, “as airlines see a payoff in offering more low-emitting options.”

 ??  ?? On average, the least-emitting itinerary on a route can emit 63% less carbon dioxide than the most-emitting option, and 22% less than the route average, a new study finds. Photograph: Arterra Picture Library/Alamy
On average, the least-emitting itinerary on a route can emit 63% less carbon dioxide than the most-emitting option, and 22% less than the route average, a new study finds. Photograph: Arterra Picture Library/Alamy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States