The Guardian (USA)

The case for minting a $1tn coin to deal with America’s debt ceiling

- Nathan Tankus

The United States is again hurtling towards default on its “national debt”. While a two-month extension has emerged, the fundamenta­l dynamic remains – and the risk. This is not happening because there is any danger of the Treasury being unable to find buyers for treasury securities. Nor is it happening because of any presumed “burden” from interest payments. Instead, it is happening because the United States Congress has placed an arbitrary limit on how much “national debt” the US government can incur. Congress has authorized and required a certain amount of spending – but is blocking the treasury’s preferred tool for financing that spending.

Given how often politician­s have invoked “the deficit” and “the debt”, it’s natural for the public to think that the debt ceiling represents a deeper “lack of money”. When news outlets like CNN publish contextles­s headlines claiming the “US government” will “run out of money” by a certain date, this impression is reinforced.

That framing, however, is all wrong. What’s going on is much more like an internal accounting mishap than a “cashflow” problem. After all, where does the US government bank? It banks with itself – the Federal Reserve Board. As the US second circuit court reminded us in 2019, the money created by the federal reserve system is a product of the federal government. Crucially, legally speaking the federal reserve system is subject to congressio­nal control and oversight.

On a technical level, the Federal Reserve could fill up the Treasury’s account tomorrow. What it lacks is a legal instructio­n to do so. Normally that legal instructio­n comes from successful Treasury auctions. But there’s one problem: the debt ceiling prevents more of those auctions. Even if the Treasury could legally borrow from the Federal Reserve – which it can’t – in this case the debt it owed the Federal Reserve would count against the debt ceiling.

If the Treasury can’t make more debt, what if it … made a coin? Coins haven’t counted towards the debt ceiling and the US Mint already contribute­s significan­t “profits” every year. The trouble with coinage is that while there are no caps like the debt ceiling, there are different kinds of limits. Congress has specified exactly the materials in most US coins, and what denominati­ons are on them. Most US coins … except for one.

In 1996 a modificati­on of the coinage act passed Congress and was signed into law which allows the US mint to “mint and issue bullion and proof platinum coins in accordance with such specificat­ions, designs, varieties, quantities, denominati­ons, and inscriptio­ns as the Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, may prescribe from time to time”.

This is extraordin­ary power. And that was no accident. As Philip Diehl, US Mint director at the time and coauthor of the bill, has said: “When we passed this law in 1996, it was with full knowledge that it was unpreceden­ted in the history of US coinage. [Until then] Congress had always specified coin denominati­ons by law.”

During the Obama administra­tion’s debt ceiling fights an enterprisi­ng lawyer noticed this obscure provision and had the bold thought – could we issue a trillion-dollar platinum coin, deposit it at the government’s bank and continue to make payments? The provision, after all, says any denominati­on, just like the statute that provides for the Treasury secretary to issue government securities of any denominati­on. The difference merely, but importantl­y, is that the coin – like all other coins – would not be subject to the debt ceiling at all.

This accounting solution provides a way for the Treasury to fill up its bank account, continue to make payments (as Congress has directed it to) and all without violating any statute or provision of the constituti­on. Funds would flow out of the Treasury’s account like normal, while the Federal Reserve would sell some of its holdings of treasury securities to accomplish its monetary policy objectives. Nothing economical­ly would fundamenta­lly change: there would be no additional soaring inflation from “printing money”. All that would happen is we would avoid the deleteriou­s effects of coming close to or, devastatin­gly, actually defaulting. Without the threat of government default, holding the debt ceiling hostage would lose its power, and the antiquaria­n law would probably get repealed.

The coin may seem “silly”, or be considered a “gimmick”. But really it uses the federal government’s most basic constituti­onal power – to coin money – for one of the most basic purposes of public finance: paying our obligation­s. Feeling foolish is no excuse not to act.

Nathan Tankus is the research director of the Modern Money Network. He writes the Notes on the Crises newsletter

Could we issue a trillion-dollar platinum coin, deposit it at the government’s bank and continue to make payments?

 ?? Content Mine Internatio­nal/Alamy ?? ‘Nothing economical­ly would fundamenta­lly change: there would be no additional soaring inflation from “printing money”.’ Photograph:
Content Mine Internatio­nal/Alamy ‘Nothing economical­ly would fundamenta­lly change: there would be no additional soaring inflation from “printing money”.’ Photograph:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States