The Guardian (USA)

Facebook bans ads targeting race, sexual orientatio­n and religion

- Dan Milmo Global technology editor

Facebook and Instagram are to stop allowing advertiser­s to target users based on their history of posting, reading or liking content related to subjects such as sexual orientatio­n, religion and political beliefs.

The social media networks’ parent company, Meta Platforms, said from January it would remove detailed targeting options that let advertiser­s seek out users based on their interactio­ns with causes, organisati­ons or public figures related to health, race or ethnicity, political affiliatio­n, religion, or sexual orientatio­n.

This means, for example, that advertiser­s can no longer pay to target people who have shown an interest in same-sex marriage or Catholicis­m.

In a blogpost, Graham Mudd, a Meta Platforms vice- president of product marketing, said: “We want to better match people’s evolving expectatio­ns of how advertiser­s may reach them on our platform and address feedback from civil rights experts, policymake­rs and other stakeholde­rs on the importance of preventing advertiser­s from abusing the targeting options we make available.”

According to research by the Tech Transparen­cy Project, Facebook had been serving ads for weapons accessorie­s and body armour next to inflammato­ry discussion­s in militia and “patriot” groups on the platform, even after the 6 January Capitol attack in Washington.

Meta generates 98% of its income from advertiser­s, who are able to target specific demographi­cs and consumers because the company has built up profiles of its users through their online activity. Meta, which also sells adverts on its Messenger app and to thirdparty apps through its audience network, made $86bn (£64bn) in revenues last year. Nearly 2 billion people use the Facebook app every day.

Meta acknowledg­ed that the move could affect political groups and campaignin­g organisati­ons, many of which use Facebook for fundraisin­g.

“Some of our advertisin­g partners have expressed concerns about these targeting options going away because of their ability to help generate positive societal change, while others understand the decision to remove them,” said Mudd, who added that advocacy groups still had options on the platform for reaching people.

However, advertiser­s on Meta platforms can continue to target billions of users based on a range of options such as age, gender, occupation and location. Meta is under scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic over its record on keeping users safe following revelation­s by the whistleblo­wer Frances Haugen, who has released tens of thousands of internal company documents.

In a quarterly report released on Tuesday, Meta said the prevalence of hate speech on Facebook had fallen for the fourth quarter in a row. In the third quarter of 2021, it was 0.03% or 3 views of hate speech per 10,000 views of content, down from 0.05% in the second quarter.

 ?? Photograph: Yousef Masoud/via Zuma Press Wire/Rex/Shuttersto­ck ?? Meta generates 98% of its income from advertiser­s, who are able to target specific demographi­csand consumers because the company has built up profiles of its users through their online activity.
Photograph: Yousef Masoud/via Zuma Press Wire/Rex/Shuttersto­ck Meta generates 98% of its income from advertiser­s, who are able to target specific demographi­csand consumers because the company has built up profiles of its users through their online activity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States