The Guardian (USA)

The rise of Éric Zemmour shows how far France has shifted to the right

- Didier Fassin Didier Fassin is a professor at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, and director of studies at the École des Hautes Études, Paris

On 17 November, the far-right journalist and polemicist Éric Zemmour went on trial in Paris on charges of incitement to racial hatred. In September 2020, he had said on the French news broadcaste­r CNews that unaccompan­ied foreign minors were “thieves, they’re murderers, they’re rapists, that’s all they are. We must send them back”. He did not appear at the trial and was represente­d by his lawyers, who said the charges were unfounded. The verdict is expected to be delivered next year.

Zemmour has previously been convicted of incitement to racial hatred and religious hatred and been tried and acquitted in several other cases. But the stakes are different this time: the defendant is now a candidate for president of the French republic. In early November, polls indicated that up to 17% of the electorate would choose him for next president. This placed him behind only Emmanuel Macron, suggesting that the second round of the election could be between the two men. On 30 November, he officially announced his candidacy.

The rise of Zemmour, 63, born to Algerian Jewish parents and raised in the banlieues of Paris, is a media phenomenon in two ways. First, he has spent most of his profession­al life working for newspapers and television, where he has been able to exercise his vitriolic style and make reactionar­y arguments. Second, he has benefited from extraordin­ary media coverage of his scandalous statements. Not only was he on the cover of the conservati­ve magazine Valeurs-Actuelles five times in the first nine months of 2021, but, according to the media observator­y Acrimed, he was mentioned 4,167 times in all French outlets in the month of September alone: 139 times per day.

The parallels with Donald Trump are clear, but there are important distinctio­ns. While Trump traded on vulgarity and was unconvinci­ng when bragging about his IQ, Zemmour is an intellectu­al who has studied at the elite university Sciences Po, even if he failed the entrance exam to the National School of Administra­tion twice, and has authored several books, even if they comprise somewhat repetitive essays. Zemmour’s rhetoric also seems to go beyond that of Trump, although it is not known how far he would go in practice.

Indeed, he has said that parents should only be allowed to give their children “traditiona­l” French names, approvingl­y referred to people comparing Nazism with Islam, propagated the so-called “great replacemen­t” theory and argued that employers have a right to turn down black or Arab candidates. He believes that political power should belong to men and that women’s role should be to have and raise children. He has claimed to be on the side of General Bugeaud, who massacred Muslims during the colonisati­on of Algeria, has contended that Marshal Pétain saved Jews during the second world war, and would like the death penalty to be reinstated.His overarchin­g narrative is reversing France’s supposed national decline, which featured again in the video announcing his candidacy.

To understand the rise of someone with such extremist views, it is important to recognise the changing dynamics within the French right, as well as the way the centre of political gravity in the country has moved rightwards. Zemmour’s rise has coincided with a drop in support for Marine Le Pen of the Rassemblem­ent National – even if the sociologic­al makeup of the two candidates’ supporters differs, as women, young people and blue-collar workers are inclined toward Le Pen, while men, older people and the upper middle class tend to favour Zemmour.

The failure of Le Pen’s party at regional elections earlier this year seems to have marked the beginning of its fall. “Everyone knows that she cannot win,” Zemmour said in the following days, adding: “Even herself”. Paradoxica­lly, through his radically rightwing positions, Zemmour has helped to detoxify the Rassemblem­ent National, a goal Le Pen had set out to achieve ever since she became its leader. Long considered beyond the pale in the political arena, she has now gained respectabi­lity. Commenting on the low turnout in her own constituen­cy at the regional elections, Zemmour said that people no longer see much difference between Le Pen and the president. “Marine Le Pen speaks like Emmanuel Macron, Emmanuel Macron speaks like Marine Le Pen”, he said on CNews.

This analysis may look biased, yet it holds a grain of truth: Macron’s interior minister, Gérald Darmanin, in a debate with Le Pen in February 2021, argued that she was “not tough enough” on Islam, adding that his government was more consistent in the fight against immigratio­n and defending secularism. In response, Le Pen confirmed their ideologica­l affinities, going as far as admitting that she could have written much of his recent book, LeSé para tis me Islam is te. Confused, the anchor who was conducting the discussion could only say: “We have the impression that what you both say and think is the same.”

This mutual understand­ing between someone whose surname is synonymous with the far right and the most prominent figure of Macron’s “centrist” government is revealing. On one hand, as she realised that her desire to leave the eurozone and appeal to the left had destabilis­ed her voting coalition, Le Pen has returned to traditiona­l conservati­ve values. On the other, recognisin­g that the left will not get to the second round of the coming presidenti­al elections and would always prefer him to an explicitly rightwing candidate, Macron has increasing­ly sought to please French conservati­ves. The brutal repression of the gilets jaunes (yellow vests); the hardening of borders with Italy and Spain; and the targeting of Muslims via an intolerant version of secularism were signs of this evolution. So too a series of typically neoliberal measures abolishing the solidarity tax on wealth, increasing the equivalent of national insurance, liberalisi­ng the labour market and reducing unemployme­nt benefits.

A great shift to the right is currently under way in France. Together, the voting intentions for Zemmour, Le Pen, Macron and whoever is the candidate for Les Républicai­ns equate to between 70% and 75% of the electorate. French public discourse is increasing­ly characteri­sed by Islamophob­ia, xenophobia and racist and sexist ideas – what some call the “Zemmourisa­tion of minds”. Arnaud Montebourg, a former Socialist who is now a presidenti­al candidate, even proposed to block Western Union transfers to countries that “do not help” with deportatio­ns – a policy that brought him sarcastic congratula­tions from Zemmour, who observed that he must have been inspired by his YouTube channel.

Whether the polemicist will become a serious contender is not yet known. Various signs suggest that he may be at a turning point, with the simultaneo­us withdrawal­s from his campaign of his main political champion, the former minister Philippe de Villiers, and of his principal financial supporter, Charles Gave. But what is certain is that his political rise has revealed the deeply worrying attraction, for a significan­t number of voters, of an ideology whose sheer violence has no equivalent in the past half-century.

 ?? Photograph: Thomas Samson/AFP/Getty Images ?? Éric Zemmour announces his candidacy for the 2022 presidenti­al election in a video broadcast on social media, Paris, 30 November 2021.
Photograph: Thomas Samson/AFP/Getty Images Éric Zemmour announces his candidacy for the 2022 presidenti­al election in a video broadcast on social media, Paris, 30 November 2021.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States