The Guardian (USA)

PFAS pollution led to contaminat­ion of US drinking water wells, study finds

- Tom Perkins

Pollution by toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” in America’s aquifer system has led to widespread contaminat­ion of private and public drinking water wells, data from a new study by the US Geological Survey finds.

The study, published in Environmen­tal Science and Technology, detected PFAS chemicals in 20% of private wells and 60% of public wells sampled in 16 eastern states, and offered new insights on how to predict which drinking water sources may be contaminat­ed.

Previous analyses have detailed the chemicals’ ubiquity in municipal water systems, but less is known about the scope of the problem in the nation’s private wells, from which about 43 million people get their water.

“This should set off alarm bells for anyone relying on private well water,” said Scott Faber, vice-president of government affairs with the Environmen­tal Working Group, which tracks PFAS issues. “One out of five people getting their water from wells could be drinking PFAS – that’s a big number.”

PFAS, or per-and poly-fluorakyl substances, are a class of more than 9,000 compounds typically used across dozens of industries to make products water-, stain- or heat-resistant. They’re in thousands of everyday consumer products such as stain guards, cookware and waterproof clothing, and are common in industrial manufactur­ing.

The chemicals are linked to cancer, birth defects, liver disease, thyroid disease, decreased immunity, hormone disruption and a range of other serious health problems. They’re dubbed “forever chemicals” because they do not naturally break down, and they also easily move through the environmen­t, often ending up in drinking water.

Analyses of public utility records have found the chemicals to be contaminat­ing water supplies for well over 100 million Americans, though estimates largely don’t cover private wells. No comprehens­ive private well monitoring system exists, many water quality standards don’t apply to them and filters installed in private wells often aren’t designed to capture PFAS.

“Well owners are flying blind,” Faber said.

The USGS undertook the analysis to provide data that could help regulators identify areas and wells that are at higher risk for PFAS contaminat­ion, though the data won’t automatica­lly trigger new testing.

Broadly, the research found higher concentrat­ions in areas “affected by modern human activity” like urbanizati­on, said Peter McMahon, one of the study’s co-authors. The chemicals were also found at a higher rate near facilities that commonly use PFAS products, like airports, military bases and chemical plants, or landfills that often leak the compounds into groundwate­r.

Wells’ depth also plays a role, McMahon noted. Those drawing from deeper and “older” groundwate­r shielded from contaminat­ed precipitat­ion had less PFAS, while wells pulling from shallow, “modern” aquifers that cycle in contaminat­ed surface water or rain have higher concentrat­ions.

Though wells near Memphis, Tennessee are in an urbanized area, the region’s deep, old water aquifer is largely clean, while nearly every well tested that relies on shallow aquifers in the Ohio Valley or New England regions had some PFAS in it. Aquifers with higher levels of pharmaceut­icals and organic material also had elevated PFAS levels.

The USGS took 254 samples from drinking water wells that draw from a network of five groundwate­r aquifers stretching from Maine to Illinois to Florida. The study looked for 24 kinds of PFAS and detected 14. Levels in a public West Virginia well reached about 1,500 parts per trillion (ppt), which is well above a level that public health advocates warn could cause health problems. The Environmen­tal Protection Agency set a health advisory limit of 70ppt, though some states have limits as low as 1ppt.

The study’s authors noted most samples found multiple types of PFAS, though little is known about how those toxic mixes impact health, and contaminat­ion levels could be much higher because thousands of PFAS compounds exist, but regulators typically only check for about 30.

Though the PFAS crisis has come into sharper focus in recent years and the chemicals’ health risks have been clear for decades, the EPA has so far failed to act on setting enforceabl­e water limits. The agency is proposing to set limits on two types of PFAS compounds in drinking water by 2023, but that still leaves thousands unaccounte­d for, and the agency has previously missed similar deadlines.

In the absence of meaningful federal oversight, many states have begun setting drinking water limits. But most of the 16 states from which the USGS checked samples don’t have any standards in place, which leaves it up to well owners to protect themselves.

That underscore­s how regulators have “failed us”, Faber said, and highlights the need to ban further PFAS production.

“This is the kind of regulatory failure that should upset every American,” he added. “It should light a fire under legislator­s who represent rural states with contaminat­ed military bases and industrial facilities.”

 ?? Photograph: Stefania Pelfini, La Waziya Photograph­y/Getty Images ?? Analyses of public utility records have found the chemicals to be contaminat­ing water supplies for well over 100 million Americans.
Photograph: Stefania Pelfini, La Waziya Photograph­y/Getty Images Analyses of public utility records have found the chemicals to be contaminat­ing water supplies for well over 100 million Americans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States