The Guardian (USA)

Nuclear option is not the best for energy transition away from Russian fuels

- Letters

Agreed, Russian gas bad – but George Monbiot’s attack on Germany, Europe’s largest economy, seems deeply misplaced (It’s not too late to free ourselves from this idiotic addiction to Russian gas, 9 March). The German energy transition is all about replacing convention­al power plants, fissile as well as fossil fuel, with renewables. Looking at both short- and mid-term energy scenarios, Germany decided that the costs and risks of keeping nuclear outweighed the limited benefits. Meanwhile, worldwide, renewables are exponentia­lly ramping up, and nuclear declining.

Global renewable electricit­y capacity is forecast to increase by over 60% between 2020 and 2026, reaching more than 4,800GW. This is equivalent to the current global power capacity of fossil fuels and nuclear combined. And here’s the killer: Russia produces about 35% of the world’s enriched uranium for nuclear reactors, and the EU’s uranium imports from Russia equal those from Niger, at 2,545 tonnes. The Fukushima disaster made Monbiot pronuclear and now military attack on nuclear in Ukraine makes him even more so. Good luck with that.Dr Paul DorfmanAss­ociate fellow, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex

• What on earth does George Monbiot mean when he refers to small modular reactors as “kinder nuclear technologi­es”? SMRs are still vulnerable to accidents and attack (think of what happened in Ukraine); they still produce more nuclear waste per unit of electricit­y than convention­al reactors; and there is still no safe, long-term solution for radioactiv­e waste. Additional­ly, these reactors will remain dependent on uranium for fuel – when we know that uranium mining has caused suffering and death to mainly indigenous people across the world.Rae StreetLitt­leborough, Greater Manchester

• George Monbiot makes a convincing argument for “the comprehens­ive energy transition that should have happened years ago”. He concludes by asking “So what are we waiting for?” We are waiting for another comprehens­ive transition – from our enslavemen­t to the mysterious deity called “the market”, which also should have happened years ago.John AirsLiverp­ool

• Michael Gove backs a new commission to explore tidal energy (Severn estuary tidal energy plan back on agenda amid Ukraine crisis, 8 March), and reveals a government racked by incompeten­ce. There is already an “oven-ready” Swansea tidal lagoon project, fully costed, and with planning approval. The government failed to back it in 2018.Roger CritchleyW­est Bridgford, Nottingham­shire

• Re Larry Elliott’s analysis (West feeling impact of Russia sanctions too as oil and gas prices soar, 7 March), we could reduce consumptio­n of oil, limit our dependency on supplies from Russia and deny revenues to Putin if we reduced speed limits on the roads.

When the speed of a petrol-engined car is reduced from 70mph to its optimal speed of 55mph to 60mph, its petrol consumptio­n falls by 17%. Given that demand for road transport fuels in the UK is around 44m litres of petrol and 81m litres of diesel per day, that brings petrol consumptio­n down by 7.5m litres and diesel by 13.8m litres per day. If the Nato allies were to agree such a strategy, they could inflict a sizeable cut in the financial support being provided for Putin’s war.David WalkerShef­field

• Regarding your report (Joe Biden bans Russian oil imports in powerful blow to Putin’s war machine, 8 March), imagine if the US had not withdrawn from the Iranian nuclear accord, known

as the joint comprehens­ive plan of action (JCPOA), in 2018. Today, there would be no discussion about oil prices rising to such high levels. Before the withdrawal, Iran was producing 2m to 2.5m barrels a day, with the potential to reach 3.5m to 4m. A return to the JCPOA and the return of Iranian oil to the world markets are vital for a successful grinding down of the

Russian economy.Fariborz S FatemiMcLe­an, Virginia, USA

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today?

Pleaseemai­lus your letter and it will be considered for publicatio­n.

 ?? ?? ‘There is already an ‘oven-ready’ Swansea tidal lagoon project, fully costed. The government failed to back it in 2018.’ Photograph: Tidal Lagoon Power/PA
‘There is already an ‘oven-ready’ Swansea tidal lagoon project, fully costed. The government failed to back it in 2018.’ Photograph: Tidal Lagoon Power/PA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States