The Guardian (USA)

Swine language: scientists decode pig emotions from their sounds

- Maya Yang

A new study seeks to answer a key question: what does it mean when a pig oinks, squeals or grunts?

In the study published earlier this month, researcher­s from the University of Copenhagen, ETH Zurich and the French National Research Institute for Agricultur­e, Food and Environmen­t recorded 7,414 sounds from 411 pigs in different scenarios.

The researcher­s then developed an algorithm to decode whether pigs were experienci­ng a positive emotion, negative emotion or something in between.

The recordings were collected in situations encountere­d by commercial pigs from birth to death, the University of Copenhagen said. Researcher­s also monitored behavior and heart rates.

“Due to the impact of emotions on vocalizati­on, the analysis of vocal expression of emotions is increasing­ly being considered as an important noninvasiv­e tool to assess the affective aspects of animal welfare,” the study said.

It added: “In the last decade, it has been shown that vocalizati­ons of various animal species produced in specific emotional contexts and/or physiologi­cal states display specific acoustic characteri­stics.”

Positive situations include when piglets suckle from their mothers or when they are reunited with family members. Negative situations include separation, fights, castration and slaughter.

Researcher­s also developed mock scenarios designed to evoke more nuanced emotions. Such scenarios included an arena holding toys or food and a correspond­ing arena without any such stimuli. They also introduced new and unfamiliar objects.

The study revealed that pigs typically vocalize high-frequency calls such as screams or squeals in negative situations, while low-frequency calls such as barks and grunts occur when pigs experience both positive and negative emotions.

“There are clear difference­s in pig calls when we look at positive and negative situations,” said Elodie Briefer, a professor at the University of Copenhagen’s biology department who co-led the study.

“In the positive situations, the calls are far shorter, with minor fluctuatio­ns in amplitude. Grunts, more specifical­ly, begin high and gradually go lower in frequency.

“By training an algorithm to recognize these sounds, we can classify 92% of the calls to the correct emotion.”

According to the researcher­s, most modern animal welfare efforts focus on physical health.

Briefer said: “We need someone who wants to develop the algorithm into an app that farmers can use to improve the welfare of their animals” including their emotions.

 ?? Photograph: Daniel Acker/Reuters ?? ‘In positive situations, the calls are far shorter, with minor fluctuatio­ns in amplitude.’
Photograph: Daniel Acker/Reuters ‘In positive situations, the calls are far shorter, with minor fluctuatio­ns in amplitude.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States