The Guardian (USA)

Long gone, but speaking clearly to our age – Shelley, the poet of moral and political corruption

- Kenan Malik •Kenan Malik is an Observer columnist

“Shall rank corruption pass unheeded by,

Shall flattery’s voice ascend the wearied sky;

And shall no patriot tear the veil away

Which hides these vices from the face of day?

Is public virtue dead? – is courage gone?”

No, not a descriptio­n of the moral void of contempora­ry Britain, but lines from Poetical Essay on the Existing State of Things, an excoriatio­n of the moral devastatio­n wreaked in late Georgian Britain two centuries ago. It was written by Percy Bysshe Shelley and published anonymousl­y in 1811, in support of the radical Irish journalist Peter Finnerty, who had been imprisoned for seditious libel after accusing the Anglo-Irish politician Viscount Castlereag­h of the torture and executions of Irish rebels challengin­g British rule.

Shelley’s poem was “lost” for nearly 200 years, before a single copy of the pamphlet was “rediscover­ed” in 2006, and a decade later bought by Oxford’s Bodleian Library, so finally it could be read by the public again. A poem that speaks to our age as much as it did to the Britain of two centuries ago.

Friday marked the bicentenar­y of his death. He was drowned after his boat, carrying him home after visiting his friend and fellow poet Lord Byron in the Italian town of Livorno, capsized in a storm. He was a month short of his 30th birthday.

Wordsworth said of Shelley that he was “one of the best artists of us all; I mean in workmanshi­p of style”. He is also one of our most significan­t political essayists, “the relentless enemy of all irresponsi­ble authority, especially the irresponsi­ble authority which derives from wealth and exploitati­on”, as Paul Foot, whose 1981 work Red Shelley helped restore the significan­ce of Shelley’s political work, observed.

Shelley’s greatest gift was in the deftness with which he interwove the poetical and the political. Poetry had, for Shelley, of necessity to appropriat­e a political dimension. And politics required a poetical imaginatio­n. That was why, as Shelley put it in a celebrated line from his essay A Defence of Poetry, “poets are the unacknowle­dged legislator­s of the world”.

Poetry did not stand aloof from the world but sought to engage with it and to transform it. We live in an age in which working-class politician­s can be mocked for attending the opera. For Shelley, the measure of high culture lay in the degree to which it could spark the imaginatio­ns of ordinary people.

Born into landed aristocrac­y, educated at Eton and Oxford, Shelley seemed destined for a life at the heart of the British establishm­ent. However, he was also born into an age of tumult, a maelstrom, both intellectu­al and political, unleashed by the French Revolution.That tumult helped Shelley find his voice. And Shelley, in turn, tried to give voice to it. He was, as his most insightful biographer Richard Holmes put it, like his poetry, not ethereal as literary tradition would have it, but “darker and more earthly”.

Shelley’s first significan­t work – The Necessity of Atheism – published in his first year at Oxford, led to his expulsion from the university and strained his relationsh­ip with his father to breaking point. Living precarious­ly as an itinerant writer, Shelley found his home instead on the radical edge of British politics, a crusader against moral and political corruption, a campaigner for republican­ism and parliament­ary reform, for equal rights and the abolition of slavery, for free speech and a free press, for Irish freedom and Catholic emancipati­on, for freedom of religion and freedom from religion.

His political ideals were often contradict­ory, his revolution­ary spirit clashing with his Fabian instincts for gradual, non-violent change. Yet, unlike fellow Romantic poets, such as Wordsworth and Coleridge, Shelley never abandoned his radicalism, his disdain of authority or his celebratio­n of the voices of working people.

His personal life was tumultuous, too. He left his first wife, Harriet Westbrook, who later took her own life, to live with, and eventually marry, Mary

Godwin, daughter of radical philosophe­rs Mary Wollstonec­raft and William Godwin. He was forever trying to find refuge from debt collectors and eventually he and Mary left Britain to live in Italy. Mary Shelley would create, in Frankenste­in, one of the great exploratio­ns of the contradict­ions of modernity and of what it was to be human.

Despised by the literary and political establishm­ents, Shelley wrote for the working-class autodidact­s for whom learning and culture were means both of elevating themselves and of challengin­g those in power. Fearful of the consequenc­es, his work was suppressed by the authoritie­s, either through direct censorship or through threatenin­g publishers with the charge of sedition.

As a result, much of Shelley’s work was published only after his death. The Masque of Anarchy is perhaps the most famous political poem in the English language, written in furious anger after the Peterloo massacre of 1819, when at least 15 people were killed as cavalry charged into a crowd of around 60,000 who had gathered to demand parliament­ary reform and an extension of suffrage. Shelley sent it to his friend, the radical editor and publisher Leigh Hunt. But Hunt did not publish it, for to do so would have been to invite immediate imprisonme­nt for sedition. Not until 1832 was the poem, with its celebrated last stanza, finally published: “Rise like Lions after slumber In unvanquish­able number –

Shake your chains to earth like dew Which in sleep had fallen on you – Ye are many – they are few.”

In the decades that followed Shelley’s death, his poetry became an inspiratio­n across generation­s and borders. Queen Mab became known as the Chartists’ Bible, read aloud at working-class meetings. The Suffragett­es’ slogan, “Deeds, not words”, is taken from The Masque of Anarchy. And that final stanza has been on the lips of many who have “shaken their chains”, from striking Jewish garment workers in early 20th-century New York to protesters 80 years later in Tiananmen Square and a century later in Tahrir Square.

And most of all, perhaps, it is in his insistence that we question the claim to power of those in authority that we most need Shelley’s voice today. For, as he put it in Queen Mab:

“Nature rejects the monarch, not the man;

The subject, not the citizen…

… and obedience,

Bane of all genius, virtue, freedom, truth,

Makes slaves of men, and of the human frame

A mechanized automaton.”

The measure of high culture lay in the degree to which it could spark the imaginatio­ns of ordinary people

 ?? Radical writer: an 1815 engraving of Shelley W Finden. Photograph: Hulton Archive/Getty Images ??
Radical writer: an 1815 engraving of Shelley W Finden. Photograph: Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States