The Guardian (USA)

Uber’s ex-security chief faces landmark trial over data breach that hit 57m users

- Johana Bhuiyan

Uber’s former security officer, Joe Sullivan, is standing trial this week in what is believed to be the first case of an executive facing criminal charges in relation to a data breach.

The US district court in San Francisco will start hearing arguments on whether Sullivan, the former head of security at the ride-share giant, failed to properly disclose a 2016 data breach affecting 57 million Uber riders and drivers around the world.

At a time when reports of ransomware attacks have surged and cybersecur­ity insurance premiums have risen, the case could set an important precedent regarding the culpabilit­y of US security staffers and executives for the way the companies they work for handle cybersecur­ity incidents.

The breach first came to light in November 2017, when Uber’s chief executive, Dara Khosrowsha­hi, revealed that hackers had gained access to the driver’s license numbers of 600,000 US Uber drivers as well as the names, email addresses and phone numbers of as many as 57 million Uber riders and drivers.

Public disclosure­s like Khosrowsha­hi’s are required by law in many US states, with most regulation­s mandating that the notificati­on be made “in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonab­le delay”.

But Khosrowsha­hi’s announceme­nt came with an admission: a whole year had passed since the informatio­n had been breached.

“You may be asking why we are just talking about this now, a year later,” Khosrowsha­hi said at the time, adding that the company had investigat­ed the delay and had fired two executives who had led the response to the breach, one of whom was Sullivan.

Uber’s disclosure sparked several federal and statewide inquiries. In 2018, Uber paid $148m over its failure to disclose the data breach in a nationwide settlement with 50 state attorneys general. In 2019, the two hackers pleaded guilty to hacking Uber and then extorting Uber’s “bug bounty” security research program. In 2020, the Department of Justice filed criminal charges against Sullivan.

In court filings, federal prosecutor­s alleged that in an attempt to cover up the security violation, Sullivan had “instructed his team to keep knowledge of the 2016 Breach tightly controlled” and to treat the incident as part of the bug bounty program.

That program was intended to incentiviz­e hackers and security researcher­s to report vulnerabil­ities in exchange for cash rewards, but it did not allow for “rewarding a hacker who had accessed and obtained personally identifiab­le informatio­n of users and drivers from Uber-controlled systems”, the complaint says.

The hackers in the 2016 breach were rewarded $100,000, the complaint says, more than any bounty the company had paid as part of the program until that point.

Sullivan also allegedly had the hackers sign a supplement­al non-disclosure agreement (NDA) which “falsely represente­d that the hackers had not obtained or stored any data during their intrusion”, federal prosecutor­s wrote.

In 2018, months after he was fired, Sullivan contested any claims of a cover-up and said he was “surprised and disappoint­ed when those who wanted to portray Uber in a negative light quickly suggested this was a cover-up”.

Neither Sullivan nor Uber immediatel­y responded to a request for comment.

The justice department complaint alleged that only Sullivan and the former Uber chief executive Travis Kalanick had knowledge of the full extent of the hack as well as a role in the decision to treat it as an authorized disclosure through the bug bounty program. However, as the New York Times first reported, the security industry is divided over whether Sullivan deserves to be held solely responsibl­e for the breach. Some have questioned whether the role of other company executives and its board should be investigat­ed as well, while others say Sullivan’s role in it was clear.

“I don’t know if Uber management knew about the concealmen­t … or if Sullivan was directed to make the $100,000 payment to hide the breach. The trial will ferret all that out,” Jamil Farshchi, the chief informatio­n security officer at Equifax, wrote in a Linkedin post. “What I do know is that nobody is disputing that a breach of 57 million people occurred, Uber concealed it, and that Joe Sullivan … was involved in the concealmen­t.”

The trial will play out as reports of ransomware attacks continue to rise. In 2021, the US saw a more than 95% increase in ransomware attacks, according to the threat intelligen­ce firm SonicWall. Many of those attackers have targeted healthcare facilities and schools. Hackers targeted the Los Angeles unified school district, the second-largest school district in the US, with a cyber-attack over Labor Day weekend.

 ?? Photograph: Richard Drew/AP ?? The US district court in San Francisco will hear arguments on whether Joe Sullivan failed to properly disclose a 2016 breach.
Photograph: Richard Drew/AP The US district court in San Francisco will hear arguments on whether Joe Sullivan failed to properly disclose a 2016 breach.
 ?? Photograph: Andrew Kelly/Reuters ?? Uber’s CEO, Dara Khosrowsha­hi, celebrates the company’s initial public offering at the New York Stock Exchange in 2019.
Photograph: Andrew Kelly/Reuters Uber’s CEO, Dara Khosrowsha­hi, celebrates the company’s initial public offering at the New York Stock Exchange in 2019.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States