The Guardian (USA)

Weak controls failing to stop illegal seafood landing on EU plates, investigat­ion shows

- Karen McVeigh

Illegally fished seafood continues to end up on the plates of EU citizens due to weak controls and insignific­ant fines in some member states, auditors have found.

The European Union, the world’s largest importer of fishery products, requires member states to take action against fishing vessels and EU nationals engaged in illegal fishing activities anywhere in the world.

However, a special investigat­ion [pdf], by the European Court of Auditors (ECA), the EU’s financial watchdog, into systems aimed at preventing products derived from illegal, unreported and unregulate­d (IUU) fishing reaching EU consumers, found them to be only “partially effective”.

“We need to tighten the net to illegal fishing within the EU,” Eva Lindström, the ECA member who led the audit, said Monday. She urged member states to step up the fight against IUU fishing, one of the greatest threats to marine ecosystems.

The EU and its member states had put in place control measures to keep illegal fishing in check, she said. “But in spite of those measures, these products keep ending up on EU citizens’ plates,” said Lindström. “One key reason is that checks and sanctions are applied unevenly by member states.”

National checks often detected instances of illegal fishing, the auditors found. But overfishin­g and underrepor­ting of catches persist, due to weak controls in some states. Misreporti­ng of catches is the most common infringeme­nt by the EU fleet, followed by fishing in closed areas or with no quota allocation, and using illegal gear.

While auditors found the vast majority of serious fishing infringeme­nts led to an investigat­ion or prosecutio­n, the sanctions applied in some states were insufficie­nt to deter illegal fishing. There was also no level playing field across states, they said. The average fine imposed for infringeme­nts ranged from €200 (£180) in Cyprus, Lithuania and Estonia, to €7,000 in Spain.

A catch-certificat­ion scheme, introduced by the EU in 2008 to guarantee the legality of imported fish products, had improved traceabili­ty and reinforced import controls, they found. But difference­s in the scope and quality of checks in states risked underminin­g its effectiven­ess.

The auditors report recommende­d the European Commission ensure member states reinforce their control systems to prevent the import of illegal fishery products. The ECA was asked by the European parliament to report on the issue in 2021.

The investigat­ion follows a 2020 report from the same auditors, which concluded that the EU’s efforts to protect the marine environmen­t had resulted in measurable progress in the Atlantic, but the Mediterran­ean remained significan­tly overfished.

From 2015 to 2019, member states conducted more than 300,000 inspection­s; 13% identified at least one suspected infringeme­nt and 6% at least one suspected serious infringeme­nt. In total, 69,400 infringeme­nts were reported during this period, with more than 76% detected by just four countries: Italy (46%), the UK (12%), Greece (11%) and Spain (8%).

Approximat­ely 94% of global fish population­s are either exploited or fully exploited, according to the UN Food and Agricultur­e Organisati­on. Worldwide, illegal unreported and unregulate­d fishing is estimated to represent between 11% and 19% of catches, worth $10bn–$23bn (£9bn– £21bn).

 ?? Photograph: Erdem Şahin/EPA ?? An inspector measures the size of fish in a trawler’s catch. Three-quarters of all infringeme­nts reported in the EU from 2015 to 2019 were detected by just four countries: Italy, the UK, Greece and Spain.
Photograph: Erdem Şahin/EPA An inspector measures the size of fish in a trawler’s catch. Three-quarters of all infringeme­nts reported in the EU from 2015 to 2019 were detected by just four countries: Italy, the UK, Greece and Spain.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States