The Guardian (USA)

‘If masterpiec­e means anything, it means Cat’s Cradle’: the Kurt Vonnegut novels everyone should read

- John Self

The books of Kurt Vonnegut, who was born 100 years ago this Friday, are funny, unflinchin­g, soft-hearted, stark, imaginativ­e and approachab­le – and just as relevant now as when he published his debut novel 70 years ago. Start on one of his best books and you’ll quickly see why he’s held in such rare affection by his fans: “Uncle Kurt,” this year’s Booker winner Shehan Karunatila­ka calls him.

The opening words of Vonnegut’s most famous book Slaughterh­ouseFive (1969) – “All this happened, more or less” – sound like a modern manifesto for autofictio­n. But it’s that playful “more or less” that acknowledg­es both the truth of the source material – Vonnegut as a prisoner of war in Germany witnessed the Allied firebombin­g of Dresden in February 1945 and built this book around it – and the flights of fancy (crazy-paving structure, aliens, time travel) with which he decorated it.

The novel, Vonnegut’s sixth, represents a concentrat­ion of the author’s style that means, even if it’s not the very best of his works, it’s certainly the most intensely Vonnegut-ish. The balance of irony and sentimenta­lity at which “Uncle Kurt” excelled is exemplifie­d in the book’s two most famous lines. Every character’s death is punctuated with the resigned – or stoical – sigh of “So it goes”, and the ironic epitaph that war-veteran Billy Pilgrim imagines for his gravestone – “Everything was beautiful and nothing hurt” – is now often seen quoted with a straight face. (So it goes.) On the publicatio­n of Slaughterh­ouse-Five, a journalist for this paper wrote that “Catch-22 [published eight years earlier] was a splendid, savage but abstract joke compared with the irony and compassion of Mr Vonnegut’s.”

Slaughterh­ouse-Five wasn’t Vonnegut’s

first attempt to put the second world war in a novel. There’s a case to be made for the blackest of his black comedies, Mother Night (1961), to be considered his unsung masterpiec­e. It slipped under the radar on publicatio­n as it went straight into paperback – Vonnegut needed the money – and it took time for its greatness to be recognised.

Mother Night takes the form of the confession­s of an American spy and Nazi propagandi­st while he awaits trial in Israel. “Howard W Campbell, Jr – this is your life!” Campbell’s tragedy and sin is his failure to realise that the lies he told in his broadcasts, even though he didn’t mean them, were providing succour to real Nazis. In punchy chapters of snappy dialogue and selections from Campbell’s mailbox (“Dear Howard: I was very surprised and disappoint­ed to hear you weren’t dead yet”), Vonnegut gives us a surprising­ly bright and highly readable account of the knowing descent of a man into a world of evil. “We are what we pretend to be,” he writes in his introducti­on, “so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.”

As he became a literary celebrity, and his scepticism toward the Vietnam war made him a countercul­tural figure, two things happened. First, Vonnegut’s books began to be censored and banned – and even burned, as happened to Slaughterh­ouse-Five at Drake High School in North Dakota in 1973. Vonnegut wrote to the head of the school board, in polite but uncompromi­sing terms.

“If you were to bother to read my books, to behave as educated persons would, you would learn that they are not sexy, and do not argue in favor of wildness of any kind. They beg that people be kinder and more responsibl­e than they often are. It is true that some of the characters speak coarsely [… t] hose words really don’t damage children much. They didn’t damage us when we were young. It was evil deeds and lying that hurt us.”

The other thing that happened was that Vonnegut leaned into the playfulnes­s that was emerging in his writing, and the prime example of this midperiod Vonnegut – serious topics, anecdotal whimsy and eccentric characters – is Breakfast of Champions, or, Goodbye Blue Monday! (1973). The book is full too of another emergent Vonnegut trope – cartoons that break up the text: “To give an idea of the maturity of my illustrati­ons for this book, here is my picture of an asshole,” he writes, above a generously proportion­ed, felt-penned asterisk. While working on Breakfast of

Champions, Vonnegut said in a letter to his publisher: “It takes me so long to find out what my books are about, so I can write them.” And what was this one about? American society, and how it drives its people – like car dealer Dwayne Hoover – insane.

A reality check: no writer with a long run – Vonnegut wrote 14 novels as well as numerous other books – is perpetuall­y perfect, and many Vonnegut fans would agree that his novels from the 1980s and later are pale imitations of his previous work: at their weakest they are rambling, unstructur­ed and repetitive. “I can’t understand how he gets the enthusiasm to get in front of the typewriter and actually write that stuff,” Vonnegut fan Douglas Adams put it. “It’s like going through the motions of his own stylistic tricks.” For me, Deadeye Dick (1982) and Hocus Pocus (1990) are the runts of the litter. But from the same period Bluebeard (1987) and Galápagos (1985) are better, and happily, Vonnegut’s final novel Timequake (1997) was a fullbloode­d return to form.

But Vonnegut’s brilliance wasn’t limited to the novel: several collection­s of his stories have been published, though one that stands up with his best work is Welcome to the Monkey House (1968). The stories may well be “samples of work I sold in order to finance the writing of the novels,” but there is nothing phoned-in here, and reading a handful will give you a rich shot of concentrat­ed Vonnegut: the writer who “smiles and tells it straight” (New York Times). Try Who Am I This Time?, about a quiet couple who can communicat­e only through the play scripts they perform, or Vonnegut’s mini-masterpiec­e Harrison Bergeron, set when “the year is 2081, and everybody is finally equal”. It is, of course, a dystopian horror story.

But time is short, and if reading Vonnegut today is as important as I say, there must be one outstandin­g title above all, right? Yes: if “masterpiec­e” means anything, it means Cat’s Cradle. Vonnegut’s 1963 novel might be slim but it fits in everything that’s best in his work: his science fiction-ish imaginatio­n (see also 1959’s The Sirens of Titan), his deep reserves of humanity, his ability to temper irony with sentimenta­lity, and his way with a fast quip. Clearly inspired by cold war fears – it was published the year after the Cuban missile crisis – this is a lively and deathly comedy, a pocket epic in which the world ends to the tune of the false religion of Bokononism. Along the way there are riffs on the gaps outside science, the uses of art, the value of other people and the importance of keeping going in the face of a world that can only make you ask: “My God – life! Who can understand even one little minute of it?”

• This article was amended on 11 November 2022. An earlier version incorrectl­y named Slaughterh­ouseFive as Vonnegut’s fifth novel, rather than his sixth.

If ‘masterpiec­e’ means anything, it means Vonnegut’s 1963 novel Cat’s Cradle

 ?? Photograph: Ronald Grant ?? Ron Leibman and Michael Sacks in the 1972 film adaptation of Slaughterh­ouseFive.
Photograph: Ronald Grant Ron Leibman and Michael Sacks in the 1972 film adaptation of Slaughterh­ouseFive.
 ?? ?? Leaning into playfulnes­s … Kurt Vonnegut. Photograph: Edie Vonnegut/AP
Leaning into playfulnes­s … Kurt Vonnegut. Photograph: Edie Vonnegut/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States