Key Democrat attacks US supreme court chief justice over ethics scandal
The chair of the Senate judiciary committee has launched a new attack on the chief justice of the US supreme court, promising a vote on ethics reform legislation after a term beset by scandal over relationships between rightwing justices and wealthy donors and featuring a string of controversial rulings.
“The highest court in the land should not have the lowest ethical standards,” Democrat Dick Durbin said.
In a Thursday statement, Durbin added: “‘God save the United States and this honourable court!’ These are the words spoken by the marshal when she gavels the supreme court into session. But many questions remain at the end of the court’s latest term regarding its reputation, credibility, and ‘honourable’ status.”
“I’m sorry to see Chief Justice [John] Roberts end the term without taking action on the ethical issues plaguing the court – all while the court handed down decisions that dismantled longstanding precedents and the progress our country has made over generations.”
Roberts has refused to testify in Congress regarding reports of alleged ethics breaches concerning justices Clarence
Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch.
Thomas’s relationship with the conservative donor Harlan Crow, including gifts, luxury travel, real-estate purchases and school fee payments, has been reported by ProPublica.
ProPublica also reported on Alito’s relationship with Paul Singer, a conservative billionaire.
And Politico reported a property sale involving Gorsuch and the chief executive of a prominent law firm.
All three justices failed to declare such gifts or transactions. All deny wrongdoing. The donors and the chief executive denied discussing politics with justices or seeking to influence business before the court.
The scandals have fueled calls for reform or, particularly in the case of Thomas, more drastic measures that might also restore some form of ideological balance to a court that was tilted right, with a 6-3 conservative supermajority, under the presidency of Donald Trump.
But Thomas’s removal, whether by resignation or impeachment, remains a political non-starter in Washington.
Three momentous rulings late in the now-concluded term – those which Durbin said “dismantled longstanding precedents and … progress” – have helped turn up the political heat from Democrats and the left.
Rightwing justices used their majority to strike down race-conscious affirmative action in higher education; rule that LGBTQ+ Americans could be discriminated against by some business owners on grounds of religious belief; and ruled Joe Biden’s student loan relief plan unconstitutional.
Durbin has pledged ethics reform legislation and said: “An announcement on the timing of this vote will be made early next week.”
In May, Roberts turned down an invitation to testify to the committee regarding ethics reform and, although supreme court justices are notionally subject to the same ethics rules as other federal justices, in practice they govern themselves.
The court’s public trust and approval ratings have reached historic lows.
Durbin said on Thursday: “Since the chief justice has refused to act, the judiciary committee must.”