The Guardian (USA)

New Mississipp­i law discrimina­tes against Black residents, says DoJ

- Edwin Rios

A recent Mississipp­i law that allows the state to appoint judges and prosecutor­s in Hinds county, including the majority-Black capital of Jackson, constitute­d a “crude scheme that singles out and discrimina­tes against Black residents”, the justice department said on Wednesday.

The agency announced its intent to intervene in a lawsuit filed by the NAACP against the state, arguing that the law, signed by the Republican governor, Tate Reeves, in April, took voting authority away from Black residents in Jackson and Hinds county, which are both Democrat-run and majority-Black.

“This thinly veiled state takeover is intended to strip power, voice and resources away from Hinds county’s predominan­tly-Black electorate, singling out the majority-Black Hinds county for adverse treatment imposed on no other voters in the state of Mississipp­i,” Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general of the justice department’s civil rights division, said in a statement. argues that the state created a “twotiered system of justice” by crafting a new court system in the part of Jackson called the Capitol Complex Improvemen­t District and doubled the area’s size through incorporat­ing Jackson’s predominan­tly white neighborho­ods in a majority-Black city.

That means state capitol police and state appointed judges and prosecutor­s would oversee the city’s predominan­tly white areas and insulate “residents within its boundaries from judges accountabl­e to the Black voters of Jackson and Hinds county”, the complaint notes.

Republican­s in the majority-white Mississipp­i legislatur­e who supported the bill’s passage argued that the law, which included an expansion of capitol police, was aimed at curtailing crime and improving public safety. Federal prosecutor­s questioned why the state could not address crime rates by “creating new elected offices, rather than The 32-page federal complaint

singling out Hinds county residents by imposing a surfeit of largely unaccounta­ble state-appointed officials”.

Unlike the NAACP case, which also challenges the law’s expansion of state capitol police as engaging in “separate and unequal policing”, the justice department’s interventi­on focuses on the state’s appointmen­t of judges and prosecutor­s within the newly created court system.

“When our state leaders fail those they are supposed to serve, it is only right that the federal government steps in to ensure that justice is delivered,” the NAACP president, Derrick Johnson, who lives in Jackson, said in a statement.

The federal complaint also argued that the state’s appointmen­t powers meant that Jackson voters would be unable to hold new officials accountabl­e because the state would appoint them, unusual in a state where most judges are elected.

The state law also came after the Mississipp­i legislatur­e “shortchang­ed” the Hinds county criminal justice system for decades by failing to “provide the county with the resources, funding and personnel that it needs”. That made it difficult for local police, prosecutor­s and judges to combat crime.

The Mississipp­i supreme court recently heard arguments in a separate case challengin­g the law. In June, a federal judge temporaril­y blocked the law from going into effect. The same judge will now determine whether the federal government can join the case.

 ?? Photograph: José Luis Magaña/AP ?? The federal complaint also argued that the state’s appointmen­t powers meant that Jackson voters would be unable to hold new officials accountabl­e because the state would appoint them.
Photograph: José Luis Magaña/AP The federal complaint also argued that the state’s appointmen­t powers meant that Jackson voters would be unable to hold new officials accountabl­e because the state would appoint them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States