The Guardian (USA)

Meta to make new version of AI model available free of charge on Microsoft

- Dan Milmo and agency

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta is making a commercial version of its artificial intelligen­ce model freely available, in a move that gives startups and other businesses a low-cost opportunit­y compete with OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard.

A new version of a Meta large language model (LLM), called Llama 2, will be distribute­d by Microsoft through its Azure cloud service and will run on the Windows operating system, Meta said in a blogpost, referring to Microsoft as “our preferred partner” for the release. LLMs underpin generative AI products like the ChatGPT chatbot, although ChatGPT’s owner has not opensource­d – or made widely available to others – its LLM, called GPT-4.

The model, which Meta previously provided only to select academics for research purposes, also will be made available via direct download and through Amazon Web Services, Hugging Face and other providers.

“Open source drives innovation because it enables many more developers to build with new technology,” Zuckerberg wrote in a Facebook post. “I believe it would unlock more progress if the ecosystem were more open.”

However, one expert said open source AI was a divisive issue, with some arguing that AI systems should not be widely available.

“There are competing schools of thought about open-sourcing AI,” said Dr Andrew Rogoyski, of the Institute for People-Centred AI at the University of Surrey. “There are people who think AI should be accessible to anyone, democratis­ing AI and keeping it available for independen­t scrutiny, and there are people who believe that AI should be withheld, like nuclear secrets, to avoid powerful technology getting into the wrong hands.”

In April, researcher­s at Stanford University in California took down a chatbot they had built for $600 using a version of the first Llama model after it generated unsavory text.

Meta executives say they believe public releases of technologi­es actually reduce safety risks by harnessing the wisdom of the crowd to identify problems and build resilience into the systems.

The company also says it has put in place an “acceptable use” policy for commercial Llama that prohibits “certain use cases”, including violence, terrorism, child exploitati­on and other criminal activities.

Making a model as sophistica­ted as Llama widely available and free for businesses to build atop threatens to upend the early dominance establishe­d in the nascent market for generative AI software by players like OpenAI, which Microsoft backs and whose models it already offers to business customers via Azure.

The first Llama was already competitiv­e with models that power OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard chatbot, while the new Llama has been trained on 40% more data than its predecesso­r, with more than 1m annotation­s by humans to fine-tune the quality of its outputs, Zuckerberg said.

“Commercial Llama could change the picture,” said Amjad Masad, the chief executive at software developer platform Replit, who said more than 80% of projects there use OpenAI’s models.

“Any incrementa­l improvemen­t in open-source models is eating into the market share of closed-source models because you can run them cheaply and have less dependency,” said Masad.

The announceme­nt follows plans by Microsoft’s largest cloud rivals, Alphabet’s Google and Amazon, to give business customers a range of AI models from which to choose.

Until now, Microsoft has focused on making technology available from OpenAI in Azure.

Asked why Microsoft would support an offering that might degrade OpenAI’s value, a Microsoft spokespers­on said giving developers choice in the types of models they use would help extend its position as the go-to cloud platform for AI work.

For Meta, a flourishin­g open-source ecosystem of AI tech built using its models could stymie rivals’ plans to earn revenue off their proprietar­y technology, the value of which would evaporate if developers could use equally powerful open-source systems for free.

A leaked internal Google memo

titled “We have no moat, and neither does OpenAI” lit up the tech world in May after it forecast just such a scenario.

Meta is also betting that it will benefit from the advances, bug fixes and products that may grow out of its model becoming the go-to default for AI innovation, as it has over the past several years with its widely adopted open-source AI framework PyTorch.

As a social media company, Zuckerberg told investors in April, Meta has more to gain by effectivel­y crowdsourc­ing ways to reduce infrastruc­ture costs and maximize creation of new consumer-facing tools that might draw people to its ad-supported services than it does by charging for access to its models.

“Unlike some of the other companies in the space, we’re not selling a cloud computing service where we try to keep the different software infrastruc­ture that we’re building proprietar­y,” Zuckerberg said.

“For us, it’s way better if the industry standardiz­es on the basic tools that we’re using and therefore we can benefit from the improvemen­ts that others make.”

Releasing Llama into the wild also comes with risks, however, as it supercharg­es the ease with which unscrupulo­us actors may build products with little regard for safety controls.

 ?? Photograph: Tony Avelar/AP ?? Facebook's Meta logo sign is seen at the company headquarte­rs in Menlo Park, California.
Photograph: Tony Avelar/AP Facebook's Meta logo sign is seen at the company headquarte­rs in Menlo Park, California.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States