The Guardian (USA)

Marina Abramović has broken a 255-year-old glass ceiling. Why did it take so long?

- Hannah Jane Parkinson

At the Royal Academy, from Saturday until New Year’s Day, the artist Marina Abramović will be present. Or rather, her work will be, as part of a retrospect­ive taking in her half-century career. Abramović is a worthy subject for a major solo show at such a prestigiou­s institutio­n. Through the likes of Rhythm 0 (1974), during which she laid out 72 objects (including a gun and a bullet) and put herself at the mercy of her audience, to the intensely moving and intimate The Artist Is Present (2010) at New York’s Museum of Modern Art, she has redefined the parameters of performanc­e art. But here is the ludicrous and infuriatin­g thing: hers will be the first solo showby a woman at the academy’s main galleries.

“The fact that in 255 years there has been no woman showing solo in this big space makes it a huge responsibi­lity,” she told an interviewe­r last month. A couple of years ago she described the pressure she felt as a prominent artist in a male-dominated scene: “I have to make work that’s so good that it opens the road for all the young and incredibly talented female artists coming after me. If my show is not good then it will reflect badly on everybody else, so I have to be incredible.”

When the Royal Academy was founded in 1768, the membership, unusually for the times, included two female academicia­ns: Angelica Kauffman and Mary Moser. Both women, however, were mentored by their fathers, which speaks to the difficulti­es women faced in securing formal training. It took 168 years for another woman to be voted a full RA member: Dame Laura Knight, in 1936 (previously Annie Swynnerton had been accepted as a “retired associate”). In 1965 Knight was the first woman to have a retrospect­ive at the RA, although it was not in the main galleries.

It would be unfair to single out the academy, given the oppression of female artists globally, throughout history. And things are, mercifully, shifting – at the RA and elsewhere. As of 2020, the RA had 40 women academicia­ns, including Tracey Emin, Jenny Saville and Gillian Wearing. Almost half of elected members in the past decade have been female, and in 2019 the celebrated painter and printmaker Rebecca Salter was elected the first female president.

Still, things are not perfect. The Burns Halperin Report, which tracks diversity in the arts, found that just 11% of acquisitio­ns between 2008 and 2020 in US institutio­ns were by female-identifyin­g artists, and their work accounted for only 3.3% of global auction sales from 2008 to mid-2022. Many leading institutio­ns, including the British Museum and the Met, have never had a female director (in 2021, the Louvre appointed Laurence des Cars, the first in its 228-year history). Just 29 women have won Britain’s foremost arts prize, the Turner, although this has rapidly improved in the past decade. Representa­tion of artists of colour and other minorities is even more lacking.

When certain demographi­cs or minorities are rejected or oppressed by traditiona­l gatekeeper­s, it isn’t just

those artists and creators who suffer; it’s all of us who miss out on the work. Imagine, say, having never been able to experience the majestic and terrifying twisted steel of Louise Bourgeois’ Maman; Frida Kahlo’s raw, honest chronicles of physical pain; the swagger of Amélie Beaury-Saurel.

At the Royal Academy, it is fitting that Abramović, whose physicalit­y and body are such integral elements of her work, is the woman to have achieved this milestone. She grew up in the shadow of a tyrannical father and, early in her career, was mocked and dismissed as mentally unhinged – a charge levelled against pioneering women for centuries.

Happily, Abramović isn’t the only prominent female artist showing solo this autumn. Sarah Lucas’s Happy Gas opens at Tate Britain on 28 September; the day after, Claudette Johnson’s Presence arrives at the Courtauld; and next month Nicole Eisenman is at the Whitechape­l. It will surely not be another 255 years until Abramović’s successor at the RA.

• Marina Abramović is at the Royal Academy, London, 23 September-1 January

 ?? Photograph: Henry Nicholls/AFP/Getty Images ?? Fire in her art … Marina Abramović poses standing on one of her artworks, White Dragon, at the Royal Academy.
Photograph: Henry Nicholls/AFP/Getty Images Fire in her art … Marina Abramović poses standing on one of her artworks, White Dragon, at the Royal Academy.
 ?? Photograph: Courtesy of the Marina Abramović Archives. © Ulay / Marina Abramović ?? Imponderab­ilia by Ulay/Marina Abramović – a 90-minute performanc­e in 1977 at Galleria Communale d’Arte Moderna, Bologna.
Photograph: Courtesy of the Marina Abramović Archives. © Ulay / Marina Abramović Imponderab­ilia by Ulay/Marina Abramović – a 90-minute performanc­e in 1977 at Galleria Communale d’Arte Moderna, Bologna.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States