The Guardian (USA)

‘The fight will continue’ for India’s LGBTQ+ campaigner­s for equal marriage

- Hannah Ellis-Petersen in Delhi

Utkarsh Saxena had been secretly planning the proposal for weeks. He had secretly measured his boyfriend’s finger while he was sleeping and bought a pair of matching steel rings from a Delhi market. They had been together for 15 years, having fallen in love on the university debating team, and Saxena felt optimistic that this would be an auspicious moment to ask the love of his life to marry him – the same day that India’s supreme court ruled on whether same-sex couples would be allowed to get married.

Yet when the verdict came out on Tuesday, Saxena’s heart broke. Even as India’s chief justice, DY Chandrachu­d, spoke of India’s long history of LGBTQ + people and their right to equality, he ruled that changing marriage laws was beyond the scope of the court and that marriage was not a fundamenta­l right. It was the job of parliament, not judges, to make such decisions, Chandrachu­d said.

Standing outside the court in Delhi alongside dozens of other queer couples and LGBTQ+ activists, Saxena was so devastated that he could not bring out the rings. But on returning home, he spilled to his boyfriend, Ananya Kotia, what his plan had been.

“He said to me, ‘Oh, I wish you’d done it, it would have made this difficult day much easier.’ So we decided to go ahead with it anyway,” Saxena said.

On Wednesday, the couple – who had felt forced to hide their relationsh­ip from some family members for more than a decade – returned to the steps of the supreme court and Saxena got down on one knee.

“After I met Kotia, I felt like even if the whole world was against us, at least we had each other and that always gave us so much strength and resilience,” he said. “So this was our way of redefining and reclaiming this moment. Our relationsh­ip has been transforma­tional for both of us and I still believe that one day we will get married in India.”

The struggle for recognitio­n of LGBTQ+ rights in India has been a long and often tortuous journey. It was only in 2018 that homosexual­ity was finally decriminal­ised by the supreme court, after two decades of protest, court cases and resistance. That was followed in 2019 by the Transgende­r Persons Act, which legally recognised the rights of trans people for the first time.

Nonetheles­s, in the five years since the landmark decriminal­isation ruling, societal acceptance of homosexual­ity in India has undeniably been on the rise. Though LGBTQ+ people still face significan­t harassment and stigma from police and within families, particular­ly in more rural and conservati­ve areas, they have also never been more visible and represente­d in popular culture, media and corporatio­ns, and issues around gay rights have never been so openly discussed within homes.

It was in this evolving environmen­t that 20 petitioner­s, including gay and lesbian couples, transgende­r people and LGBTQ+ activists, decided to merge their individual lawsuits to collective­ly fight for the right to be married under a civil law. It went up to India’s highest court, and between April and May this year, in a marathon of hearings, a special five-strong panel of supreme court justices listened to some of the country’s top lawyers – many of them gay themselves – laying out arguments for why LGBTQ+ people deserved the same rights in love and marriage as heterosexu­al couples under the constituti­on.

“It was a real glimmer of hope. The arguments for it were so logical and so strong,” said Ruchika Khanna, 46, an advertisin­g consultant in Delhi. Like many in the LGBTQ+ community, she was glued to the hearings, which were livestream­ed online and became a topic of national discussion. She, like many, had pinned her hopes on Chandrachu­d, who is widely seen as one of India’s most progressiv­e chief justices in years.

But the government, led by the rightwing, religious nationalis­t Bharatiya Janata party (BJP), had vehemently opposed the case in the courts, arguing that marriage could only be between a biological man and woman and

 ?? Photograph: Arun Sankar/AFP/Getty Images ?? Protesters in New Delhi last week after the supreme court ruling against same-sex marriage.
Photograph: Arun Sankar/AFP/Getty Images Protesters in New Delhi last week after the supreme court ruling against same-sex marriage.
 ?? Photograph: Divyakant Solanki/EPA ?? People at LGBTQ+ advocacy group the Humsafar Trust in Mumbai listening to the verdict.
Photograph: Divyakant Solanki/EPA People at LGBTQ+ advocacy group the Humsafar Trust in Mumbai listening to the verdict.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States