The Guardian (USA)

George Santos will not seek re-election after House details ‘pervasive’ fraud

- Martin Pengelly in Washington

The New York Republican congressma­n, fabulist and criminal defendant George Santos said he would not seek re-election next year, after the US House ethics committee issued a report detailing “grave and pervasive campaign finance violations and fraudulent activity” and recommende­d action against him.

“I will NOT be seeking re-election for a second term in 2024 as my family deserves better than to be under the gun from the press all the time,” Santos said, calling the report “biased” and “a disgusting politicise­d smear”.

But after the report detailed his conduct, moves for a new expulsion resolution began.

“Representa­tive Santos sought to fraudulent­ly exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit,” the committee said.

“He blatantly stole from his campaign. He deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributi­ons to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit.

“He reported fictitious loans to his political committees to induce donors and party committees to make further contributi­ons to his campaign – and then diverted more campaign money to himself as purported ‘repayments’ of those fictitious loans.

“He used his connection­s to highvalue donors and other political campaigns to obtain additional funds for himself through fraudulent or otherwise questionab­le business dealings. And he sustained all of this through a constant series of lies to his constituen­ts, donors, and staff about his background and experience.”

Santos, 35, was elected last year, as Republican­s retook the House in part thanks to a strong performanc­e in New York. But as his résumé unraveled amid increasing­ly picaresque reports about his life before entering Congress, including questions about his actual name, he admitted “embellishi­ng” his record.

Allegation­s of criminal behaviour emerged. Santos has now pleaded not guilty to 23 federal criminal charges, including laundering funds and defrauding donors.

He has survived attempts to expel him from the House, including from members of his own party. Most recently, 31 Democrats voted against making him only the sixth member ever expelled, saying he should not be thrown out without being convicted. Three congressme­n were expelled in 1861, for supporting the Confederac­y in the civil war. Two have been expelled after being criminally convicted, the last in 2002.

Republican leaders, beholden to a narrow majority, had said they would wait for the ethics report.

On Thursday, the New York Democrat Dan Goldman said: “More than 10 months after Congressma­n [Ritchie] Torres and I filed a complaint … the committee has … concluded that George Santos defrauded his donors, filed false Federal Election Commission reports, and repeatedly broke the law in order to fraudulent­ly win his election last November.”

Promising to “file a motion to expel Santos from Congress once and for all” after the Thanksgivi­ng break, Goldman said Republican­s “no longer have any fictional excuse to protect Santos in order to preserve their narrow majority”.

Mike Lawler, a New York Republican who has tried to expel Santos, said Santos should “end this farce and resign immediatel­y. If he refuses, he must be removed from Congress. His conduct is not only unbecoming and embarrassi­ng, it is criminal. He is unfit to serve and should resign today”.

Mike Johnson, the new Republican speaker, has said Santos deserves due process. Speaking to Fox News last month, he also said Republican­s had “no margin for error”.

But according to the Washington Post, citing an anonymous source, Michael Guest of Mississipp­i, the Republican committee chair, planned to file a motion to expel Santos on Friday, setting up a possible vote after the Thanksgivi­ng holiday next week.

Susan Wild of Pennsylvan­ia, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said she “intend[ed] to vote yes on any privileged expulsion resolution … as the work of the committee is now complete, and I am no longer obligated to maintain neutrality”.

Santos said: “If there was a single ounce of ETHICS in the ‘ethics committee’, they would have not released this biased report. The committee went to extraordin­ary lengths to smear myself and my legal team about me not being forthcomin­g (my legal bills suggest otherwise).

“It is a disgusting politicise­d smear that shows the depths of how low our federal government has sunk. Everyone who participat­ed in this grave miscarriag­e of justice should all be ashamed of themselves.”

Somewhat optimistic­ally, he called for a constituti­onal convention to formalise action against Joe Biden for supposed crimes. More contritely, Santos said he was “humbled yet again and reminded that I am human and I have flaws”.

The report was accompanie­d by extensive appendices including evidence of apparent malpractic­e. Santos was shown to have spent donor money on vacations, luxury goods, Botox treatment and the website OnlyFans.

One exhibit showed a suggestion by a staffer to place a microphone under a table bearing donuts for reporters, an offering that made headlines earlier this year.

The committee said Santos had not cooperated, “continues to flout his statutory financial disclosure obligation­s and has failed to correct count

less errors and omissions in his past [financial disclosure] statements, despite being repeatedly reminded … of his requiremen­t to do so.

“The [committee] also found that, despite his attempts to blame others for much of the misconduct, Representa­tive Santos was a knowing and active participan­t in the wrongdoing. Particular­ly troubling was Representa­tive Santos’ lack of candour during the investigat­ion itself.”

The committee said it would refer its findings to federal prosecutor­s. Members of Congress, it said, should take any action “appropriat­e and necessary … to fulfill the House’s constituti­onal mandate to police the conduct of its members”.

Outside Congress, Brett Edkins, of the pressure group Stand Up America, said: “This report has one clear conclusion: Santos is wholly unfit to hold office.

“If George Santos had any shame or remorse over deceiving hard-working New Yorkers and his colleagues in Congress, he would resign immediatel­y. Instead, he continues to use every possible lie and excuse to cling to power … since he refuses to step down, House Republican­s should grow a backbone and expel him.”

 ?? Photograph: J Scott Applewhite/AP ?? George Santos faces 23 federal criminal charges, including laundering funds and defrauding donors. He has pleaded not guilty.
Photograph: J Scott Applewhite/AP George Santos faces 23 federal criminal charges, including laundering funds and defrauding donors. He has pleaded not guilty.
 ?? Photograph: Julia Nikhinson/Reuters ?? Santos earlier this month after his congressio­nal colleagues voted not to expel him from the House.
Photograph: Julia Nikhinson/Reuters Santos earlier this month after his congressio­nal colleagues voted not to expel him from the House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States