The Guardian (USA)

Shock of the old: 10 trailblazi­ng and transgress­ive tattooed ladies

- Emma Beddington Nora Hildebrand­t Photograph: Alamy

“The most vulgar and barbarous habit the eccentric mind of fashion ever invented.” Thank you, 19th-century arbiter of social taste Ward McAllister.

With the dames Judi Dench and Helen Mirren on the bandwagon, it’s hard to see tattooed women as transgress­ive today. In some communitie­s, they never were: tattooing practices were part of puberty rituals and used for therapeuti­c purposes, to commemorat­e milestones and to recognise kin in the afterlife.

But other tattooed women’s motivation­s were mysterious. A 3,000-yearold mummy discovered in Deir elMedina, Egypt, in 2019 is adorned with seated baboons, a cobra, cows and lotus blossoms. Archaeolog­ists have puzzled over why. Was she a priestess, or a “magico-medical healer”? Were her tattoos the equivalent of protective amulets? Did she just really like baboons?

Unpicking the truth about 19th- and early-20th-century western women’s tattoos is tricky, too. Tattooed ladies in circuses needed a good origin story; the more lurid, the better. Tales of frontier capture and kidnap were wildly popular. Nora Hildebrand­t maintained her father was forced to tattoo her while they were being held by Sitting Bull. Some stories were even more outthere: Laura Laramie, a tattooed lady in Baltimore, reported giving birth to an identicall­y tattooed baby, according to Margot Mifflin’s fascinatin­g history of women’s tattoos, Bodies of Subversion.

The truth was more prosaic. Tattoos offered emancipati­on (circus life meant travel and adventure) and the potential of an excellent living. In the 1890s, a successful tattooed lady could earn $100 to $200 a week, when workingcla­ss families lived on $300 to $500 a year.

Meanwhile, in fin de siècle high society, getting a tattoo became fashionabl­e pour épater les bourgeois,or to show how well-travelled you were. “In place of spending her spare time posing in front of the camera … the lady about town now consents to be pricked by the tattoo artist’s operating needle,” marvelled an 1898 article. In 1880, the New York Times claimed at least 7.5% of fashionabl­e women in London “were tattooed in inaccessib­le localities”; 17 years later, the New York World asserted that 75% of American society women had a tattoo.

Regardless of popularity or motivation, there is a pleasing crackle of subversion about history’s tattooed ladies. “Women’s initial interest … came in the wake of feminism’s first wave in the late 19th century … a second craze crested in the suffragist 20s and women tattooists broke the gender barrier in the feminist 70s,” writes Mifflin. Boringly, wimpishly inkless, I find their pictures and stories as thrilling as any carnival sideshow punter. Let’s enjoy this, a rare Shock of the old in which (almost) nothing terrible happens!

The Princess of Ukok

Photograph: CPA Media/Alamy Discovered in the Siberian permafrost in 1993, this possible noblewoman or spiritual leader was buried in the fifth century BC with six horses and cannabis. The startlingl­y modern-looking tattoos along her arms include a deer with a griffin beak and Capricorn horns, plus a sheep with a snow leopard at its feet. She was recently credited with protecting the Altai region from Covid, but also blamed for causing various natural disasters as retributio­n for her grave being disturbed. Swings and roundabout­s.

Olive Oatman

Photograph: Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Oatman’s was the original frontierca­pture-tattoo narrative. It was partly true – her family were captured by Yavapai Indians in 1851, then she was traded to the Mohave before eventually being ransomed back to the US army – but the evidence suggests she assimilate­d happily. Mifflin says Oatman’s adoptive Mohave family probably tattooed her chin “to guarantee her passage to the afterlife”. It’s very unlikely that she was forced: captives were never tattooed and Oatman’s five parallel lines were perfectly straight (which would have been impossible to achieve if she had been wriggling). Later, Oatman toured the country telling her gripping, if inaccurate, tale of abuse and brutality, making her one of the first women to make a living from her tattoos.

Hildebrand­t beat her great rival Irene Woodward to the stage by a matter of weeks in 1882, but Woodward – younger, slimmer and more convention­ally attractive – had the more enduring career (“natural beauty mattered in the business of manufactur­ed freaks,” Mifflin writes). Hildebrand­t didn’t do badly, though: on an 1884 tour in Mexico, she was given a pony, an eagle and a tiger. Contrary to her lurid tale of capture by Sitting Bull, her 365 tattoos (including birds, flowers, and the word “liberty” on her leg) were completed by her common-law husband Martin, a popular tattooist.

Aimée Crocker

Photograph: Granger/Historical Picture Archive/Alamy

Crocker’s tattoos were among the tamer things about her. A railroad heiress known in the 1910s as “the Queen of Bohemia”, Crocker had five husbands, two of whom were Russian princes (they claimed) 20 years her junior. She once threw a party for “the Maharaja of Amber” without telling guests that the maharaja was her boa constricto­r. She wrote about a sexual

 ?? ??
 ?? Photograph: Archive Photos/Getty Images ?? The American tattoo artist Mildred Hull at her tattoo parlour in Manhattan, circa 1940.
Photograph: Archive Photos/Getty Images The American tattoo artist Mildred Hull at her tattoo parlour in Manhattan, circa 1940.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States