How to date when you’re a woman who doesn’t want children
In the United States, the number of adults opting to go childfree is growing. According to 2021 data from the Pew Research Center, 44% percent of adults aged 18 to 49 report it’s unlikely they will ever have children – up 7% from 2018 data. The decision to have children, or not, is deeply personal. Some are concerned about the climate crisis or financial constraints, while others simply don’t want or enjoy children much.
Abioye Moreau*, 26, is concerned about the dangers of pregnancy, especially for Black women. “Part of my anxiety was [that] my mother had very traumatic pregnancies. So I’m honestly just scared of pregnancy and what that could be for me,” Moreau says. Though she does still date people with or who want kids, Moreau says in a perfect world, she would have a partner with zero interest in children.
Despite the growing normalization of a childfree life, many women still encounter societal expectation, gender roles, dismissal and, sometimes, breakups. “A lot of women I see, even if they are in their early 20s, feel pressure to make a decision and to be sure about it because of this idea of a biological clock,” says Dr Erika Bach, a licensed clinical psychologist with a speciality in trauma and relationships. “There’s a lot of doubt and second guessing and it’s such a shame. [Women] deserve to feel support in different choices.”
Dating as a woman who doesn’t want kids can require some strategy. Below, experts weigh in on how to approach childfree dating. Understand your reasons for wanting to be childfree
When approaching your love life, you don’t need to have everything figured out. But if you know children are off the table – or you’re still undecided – it’s a good idea to understand why.
Start by exploring your fantasies, daydreams and hopes, advises Dr Logan Stohle, a licensed clinical psychologist and staff therapist at The Expansive Group. “I think a great question for people is: without thinking through every angle and logistical matter, putting all obligations and practical matters aside, what do you want?” says Stohle. “When it comes to kids specifically, I ask questions like: how do you feel when you’re around kids? Do you enjoy it? Do you feel present? Or do you try to steel yourself and endure it?”
Even if you know you don’t want children, reflecting on how you feel about them can help you better imagine your future relationships and clarify your values – the whypart of your decision. “When women in particular opt out of having kids, it is likely coming from somewhere deep and very meaningful for them,” adds Stohle.
For Hannah McMillen, 35, the pressures and values around motherhood were too stifling. “I know many women who are resentful because they feel the sacrifice of their independence is taken for granted,” she says.
The division of labor, too, was a consideration for McMillen. According to 2018 research from the Center of American Progress, mothers spend more time working, caretaking and keeping house than fathers. “[I] know very few families who manage to adequately divide household labor between both parents, meaning that motherhood has been a tremendous burden even for those who enjoy it most,” she says.
In short, make sure you consider everything that comes along with having children, and whether it aligns with what you want from life.
Prepare to discuss being childfree with dates
It may seem intuitive, even obvious, to lead with transparency when dating. On some dating apps, it’s easy to indicate whether you want children on your profile. Often, the topic comes up organically early on, which “can thrust a budding relationship dynamic into a pretty high-stakes and important place”, says Stohle.
But talking about kids right away may not guarantee you’re on the same page. Last year, McMillen’s boyfriend of over two years broke up with her, citing his realization that she wouldn’t change her mind about kids. “This has been the through-line in my past three relationships,” says McMillen. She states her decision to be childfree; a partner supports her, then after a number of years admits “he never believed I would really stick to my guns, and gives me the ultimatum that we can only continue to be together if I change my mind,” she says. “Obviously it has been incredibly frustrating to discover that I have not been taken seriously or have been thought of as insincere or easily swayed.”
The hard truth is that being upfront is no guarantee you will be heard or respected. Instead, the “right” time to talk – and to commit to a relationship – depends on each particular dynamic, rapport with a potential match and a good helping of gut instinct.
Still, it’s important to be clear about being childfree, says Dr Patrice Le Goy, a psychologist and licensed marriage and family therapist specializing in maternal mental health and relationships.
How deeply you choose to delve into this topic is up to you. “It can be very hard to not try to offer an explanation. People aren’t really owed that unless you feel comfortable that it’s something you want to share,” she says. “Being very firm in your beliefs and knowing why you’re making the decisions makes it a lot easier to share that.” As the relationship progresses, you may choose to discuss your decision and what it means to you more thoroughly.
McMillen has adopted a new tactic: not playing her cards too early. While out on a date, she asks men how they feel about children beforerevealing anything about herself. “[I take] anything less than a firm commitment to being childfree as an immediate no-go zone,” she says.
If you’re considering compromising, explore your reasons – and
the relationship – carefully
In a relationship, it’s normal to seek cohesion and compromise. In her first serious relationship, Moreau and her boyfriend came to an impasse around children. Moreau went to therapy to “to see if I could honestly convince myself to want kids for this man”, she remembers. “I really wanted that relationship and it was an intense time.”
Of course, everyone has the right to change their mind, but Bach says this can be a sign of people pleasing. Bach has noticed that hitting it off with someone new can mean her clients start questioning their deal breakers or trying to accommodate a partner’s wants over their own. “They start doing this mental math of ‘how can I make this work? how can I bend what I need just to be with this person?’” says Bach.
But, she says, we should be cautious when it comes to compromising our core values. Compromise about the details of a significant decision can be healthy, but having a child is all or nothing. If you know you want to be childfree, but feel a tug to have kids forsomeone or to save a relationship, Le Goy recommends taking a beat and noticing not only how you feel right now, but also imagining how you might feel in the future.
“If you make a decision that you’re very unhappy with, everyone’s going to suffer,” says Le Goy. “Who wants to have a kid or a relationship that you’re resentful of because it was never what you wanted in the first place?”
Incompatibility can be difficult to acknowledge and act on. But focusing on the future you dowant – and your worth apart from a relationship or children – can help ground your decisions.
“In moving through the world as a childfree woman,” says McMillen, “I have learned to appreciate and celebrate the depth of my own intrinsic value.”
*
time spent as a fabulously rich person, after his ill-advised movie project Irresistible met a ruthless political moment with weak-tea centrist satire, he’s somehow still got it. Miracle of miracles, Stewart has not lost the ability to be our guy, to act as the collective release valve for anger too studied for standup and too frank for news media.
For better and for worse, the notion of continuity was always going to hang over Stewart’s first night back, which he began with the same old fauxscribbling on his notes and a winking reintroduction of “Now, where was I?” Following a reassuring dose of selfdeprecation – “Why am I back? I have committed a lot of crimes and, from what I understand, talkshow hosts are granted immunity,” he deadpanned – he led with some light material on the Super Bowl and Taylor Swift, his focus on the irony that rightwingers opposed to her liberal agenda had to root for San Francisco, or “the People’s Communist Gay Republic of Pelosistan”. This specific brand of rhetorical checkmate, long Stewart’s stock in trade during his Daily Show tenure, has lost its power in the face of a Republican party no longer cowed by the exposure of their own hypocrisies. And as Stewart led off the segment on the candidates’ fitness for office with a montage of Trump not remembering things, his broadsides started to look woefully inadequate against a GOP in many ways mockeryproof.
But savvy remains Stewart’s secret weapon, evident as he pivoted his easy giggles at the expense of doddering oldsters into a sturdier, more salient point about both parties’ demands for lockstep support from their base. More pressing than Biden occasionally drifting off is the Democrat leadership’s insistence that no one remark on it, the consolidation of authority taking precedence over the party’s best interests. On the way to his conclusion that a worthy politician should be able to withstand scrutiny from their side of the aisle, Stewart exercises his latitude to address elephants in the room with bracing, blunt terms. The nine months leading up to the election “are going to suck”, he warns us. “And even if your guy wins, the country is in no way saved.” He alone can verbalize the question on everyone’s minds: “What the fuck are we doing here, people?”
For a presumed block of watchers tuning back in after parting with Stewart in 2015, the middle segment issued a brisk who’s who of the current correspondent rotation set to jointly hold the fort on Tuesday through Thursday.
Desi Lydic, Michael Kosta, Dulcé Sloan and Ronny Chieng converged on one of those diners where Real America gathers to give soundbites and, back at the studio, Jordan Klepper reacquainted the folks at home with his Vice-flavored maverick newshound persona. The interview segment also sent a clear message about upheld standards of rigor, the Economist editor-in-chief, Zanny Minton Beddoes, conferring an air of higher-brow intellectualism. It all cohered into an insistent and not unconvincing impression that we’re in good hands, the format and ethic of a show closely identified with gen X unchanged yet far from obsolete for the 2020s.
We’ve got the rest of the year to see whether the ship has truly been righted, but Stewart’s encouraging stepin points to a secure future for a TV institution in jeopardy. He still has a deft control over the harmony at the center of his shtick, the balance between his lacerating sarcasm and the quavering sincerity he bares when he tells us that “the work of making this world resemble one that you’d prefer to live in is a lunchpail fucking job, day in and day out”. Though he may benefit from the residual trust left over from his reign, he’s ready – and, seemingly, able – to earn it all over again.