The Guardian (USA)

The Biden administra­tion has a chance to deliver student debt relief. It must act

- Astra Taylor and Eleni Schirmer

Last week, the Washington Post reported that President Biden recently pressed Jeff Zients, his chief of staff, on the issue of student debt cancellati­on, telling him “to make sure his team was making the relief as expansive as possible”.

That’s good news for tens of millions of borrowers. But expansive relief will not be delivered if the administra­tion fails to learn the lessons from round one of the cancellati­on battle: speed and conviction matter.

When the supreme court struck down President Biden’s attempt to cancel student debt last summer, his administra­tion got to work to make plans for future cancellati­on. Today, the window for cancellati­on is open once again. Biden’s Plan B has a fighting chance – but only if the president moves fast.

Last month the administra­tion concluded a five-month-long regulatory process to hammer out the legal parameters for cancellati­on using the Higher Education Act – a different legal authority than Biden used the first time around. In the last session of this process, a session which was only undertaken thanks to pressure from activists and progressiv­e elected officials, rulemakers cracked open a critical window for debt cancellati­on.

This session establishe­d “economic hardship” as grounds for cancellati­on. Once again, Biden’s Plan B has a fighting chance – but only if the president seizes the moment and walks through it.

Why is the new provision on economic hardship such a gamechange­r? As we know all too well from our work in the debt abolition movement, the vast majority of student borrowers experience economic hardship, struggling to make basic living expenses. In fact, we consider student loans themselves to be an indicator of economic hardship, a kind of regressive and financiall­y debilitati­ng tax on anyone who isn’t wealthy enough to pay for tuition outright.

These new guidelines recognize this. They open space for Biden to deliver on promised relief. Our fear, however, is that the administra­tion will move slowly and cautiously, and, by doing so, enable their Republican adversarie­s to slam the window shut and claim another victory.

Moving slowly – a result of prioritizi­ng means-tested relief, rather than cancellati­on for all – was one of the reasons that Biden’s prior debt relief plan met a bad end. Consider how the Department of Education took 51 days to put their extremely simple applicatio­n for relief online. Every day they delayed implementi­ng relief bought time for billionair­e-backed lawsuits to move through a court system stacked with conservati­ve judges eager to make partisan rulings.

It has now been six months since Biden announced his Plan B and already too much time has been wasted on regulatory machinatio­ns that some experts argued weren’t even necessary to begin with. Looking ahead, cancellati­on must be issued in the boldest, fastest manner possible, to give people relief and to register the results in time for the upcoming elections.

If the administra­tion decides, once again, to route cancellati­on through an applicatio­n or to otherwise “target” relief, instead of universall­y applying it, we will find ourselves in a Groundhog Day scenario: waiting for the administra­tion to ready their process to administer relief while further lawsuits are prepared by the conservati­ve right’s battalion of highly paid lawyers.

Last summer, both of us helped launch a first-of-its kind online tool that helps borrowers create and send legal appeals for the Department of Education to cancel their debt. The Student Debt Release Tool builds from the Department of Education’s legal authority to cancel student debt as part of the Higher Education Act of 1965 – a tried and true authority that has been used many times to eliminate people’s federal loans. Within weeks of the launch of the Student Debt Release Tool, tens of thousands of borrowers submitted appeals, flooding the Department of Education, and rumored to have shut down the agency’s email servers at least once.

The informatio­n in the Release Tool clearly demonstrat­es how student debt creates hardship, and why cancellati­on is the urgent and just response. In these appeals, borrowers recount their brushes with homelessne­ss and turns to sex work, their mounting medical bills, their children’s grumbling stomachs when the cupboards yet again fall empty, the anxiety and depression that ensues.

The Release Tool also shows that the Department of Education already has the informatio­n it needs to act, and should start doing so now.

Beyond a canned reply, however, borrowers have received no meaningful response to their appeals from the Department of Education, leading debtors to seek help elsewhere. Over the past three months, groups of student borrowers in New York, Boston, Seattle, Philadelph­ia, Georgia, Indianapol­is and Missouri have been virtually marching into their congressio­nal representa­tive’s offices – asking them to send letters to the Department

of Education urging the secretary to use the powers vested in him by the Higher Education Act to cancel student debt without delay, or excessive administra­tive procedures that risk thwarting the actual delivery of relief.

Although President Biden insists that he is doing everything he can to cancel student debt, the tens of millions of debtors desperate for relief, and the tens of thousands of unanswered Release Tool appeals, suggest otherwise.

Since President Biden’s initial plan to cancel debt was announced, the stakes have only become higher. As part of debt ceiling negotiatio­ns, President Biden turned student loan payments back on, leading the interest on over $1.6tn of federal student loan debt to once again pile up. Although Biden has attempted to reform one of the most faulty income-driven repayment programs, too many borrowers have found their payments erroneousl­y increasing, rather than the purported goal of lowering monthly bills.

And while the Biden administra­tion proudly struts its efforts to cancel student debt on social media, in reality only 10% of eligible borrowers have received even partial relief. The majority are waiting, desperatel­y, on a promise unfulfille­d. A sense of being gaslit looms.

There is, of course, no way for Biden to wholly protect against badfaith litigation or to avoid anti-democratic decrees issued by Trump-appointed judges. But the Biden administra­tion should show it is willing to fight. Don’t tell voters you are doing everything you can on debt cancellati­on, President Biden. Show us.

Astra Taylor is a writer, organizer and documentar­y maker and a cofounder of the Debt Collective

Eleni Schirmer, a writer and postdoctor­al fellow at the Concordia University Social Justice Centre in Montreal, is part of the Debt Collective

mantic song, but you do you, as they say. Shillingfo­rd was flogging his own merch at the end. Imagine a gig before music existed as an industry, when it was just some people who had found themselves in a room and knew all the words, but only one had a mic.

If no one heeded me 30 years ago, they definitely won’t now, so I’ll just leave it at: My Life Story – hard recommend.

at the University of Maryland and the author, most recently, of Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constituti­onal Reform After the Civil War

 ?? Photograph: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images ?? ‘Expansive relief will not be delivered if the administra­tion fails to learn the lessons from round one of the cancellati­on battle: speed and conviction matter.’
Photograph: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images ‘Expansive relief will not be delivered if the administra­tion fails to learn the lessons from round one of the cancellati­on battle: speed and conviction matter.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States