The Guardian (USA)

Despite the United Nations vote, Biden is clinging to his failed Israel policy

-

After the US vetoed three previous resolution­s, the United Nations security council voted on Monday to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza during the remaining weeks of Ramadan. The UN resolution was approved after Joe Biden’s administra­tion dropped its veto threat and lifted its diplomatic cover for Israel, at least temporaril­y, by abstaining from the vote.

Has Biden finally decided to use his leverage over Israel to stop its devastatin­g war in Gaza, which has killed more than 32,000 people, the majority of them women and children and displaced over 75% of the population? It doesn’t seem so: on the same day that the US abstained on the UN ceasefire resolution, allowing it to pass, the Biden administra­tion inexplicab­ly declared that Israel had not violated internatio­nal law or blocked humanitari­an aid from reaching desperate people in Gaza.

It’s astounding that the US could make this declaratio­n a week after the UN’s global authority on food security found that famine is imminent in northern Gaza – where 1.1 million people, nearly half of Gaza’s population, are facing catastroph­ic malnutriti­on and shortages of food. Since December, humanitari­an groups and UN officials have raised the alarm about Israel’s policy of intentiona­lly starving Gaza and the potential for widespread famine. But the Biden administra­tion largely ignored these warnings, and continued to send weapons to Israel despite US laws that prohibit shipping arms to allies that obstruct aid.

“We have not found them to be in violation of internatio­nal humanitari­an law, either when it comes to the conduct of the war or when it comes to the provision of humanitari­an assistance,” Matthew Miller, a US state department spokespers­on, said at a press conference on Monday. Miller confirmed that Israel, along with six other countries that are receiving US military aid, had submitted written assurances by a 24 March deadline that they’re not using American-supplied weapons to violate internatio­nal law.

These declaratio­ns are required under a new national security memorandum that Biden issued last month, under pressure from Democratic members in Congress and progressiv­e voters angry over Biden’s unconditio­nal support for Israel since it launched its war on Gaza after the 7 October attack by Hamas. The memo sets out standards that recipients of US military aid must adhere to, and it requires the administra­tion to submit an annual report to Congress. That report, which will be due in May, must explain how beneficiar­ies of US military support are abiding by internatio­nal law and allowing the transport of humanitari­an aid during active conflicts.

It’s clear that the Biden memo is an exercise in bureaucrat­ic ass-covering, and not any real change in US policy. How else can the administra­tion explain its conclusion that Israel is abiding by internatio­nal law and not obstructin­g humanitari­an aid as the entire world can see the opposite playing out in Gaza?

As it has done since the start of the war, the Biden administra­tion is taking Israel at its word, despite voluminous evidence of violations of internatio­nal law. To start, Israel is likely violating parts of the Geneva Convention­s and the Rome Statute of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court, which both prohibit using starvation of civilians as a weapon of war and consider it a war crime. By continuing to send weapons to Israel, the Biden administra­tion should be worried about not only violating its own policies and US laws, but complicity in potential Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity.

On Tuesday, Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinia­n territorie­s, delivered a damning report to the UN human rights council, saying that Israel has carried out acts of genocide in Gaza and should be subject to an internatio­nal arms embargo. “The overwhelmi­ng nature and scale of Israel’s assault on Gaza and the destructiv­e conditions of life it has inflicted reveal an intent to physically destroy Palestinia­ns as a group,” the report said, adding there were “reasonable grounds” that Israel was carrying out three of the five acts defined as genocide under a UN convention adopted in 1948.

In late January, the internatio­nal court of justice ordered Israel to prevent acts of genocide by its military in Gaza, and to allow more humanitari­an aid into the territory. The court, which released an interim judgment in a case brought by South Africa, could take years to hear evidence and issue a final ruling on whether Israel has committed genocide. But human rights and internatio­nal relief groups have documented that Israel continues to ignore the court’s interim orders by obstructin­g the delivery of food and other aid into Gaza.

The Biden administra­tion is also willing to ignore the world court’s findings, which are binding on its member states. The court does not have its own enforcemen­t powers, but it can refer cases to the UN security council, where the US had consistent­ly used its veto to protect Israel from demands for a ceasefire until this week. So far, Israel shows no sign of complying with the UN resolution that calls for an immediate ceasefire, the release of all remaining Israeli hostages held by Hamas, and the removal of “all barriers to the provision of humanitari­an assistance”.

While UN security council resolution­s are also considered binding on member states, the council would likely need to pass additional measures, such as sanctions, to punish Israel for not complying with the initial ceasefire resolution. But it seems highly unlikely that Biden would allow such a measure to pass without using the US veto.

In fact, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was so enraged by the Biden administra­tion’s failure to veto the latest UN resolution that he lashed out at the US president by cancelling a high-level Israeli delegation’s visit to Washington scheduled for later this week. The group of Israeli military, intelligen­ce and humanitari­an officials was supposed to discuss alternativ­es to a ground invasion of Gaza’s southern city of Rafah, where more than a million Palestinia­ns have taken refuge. For weeks, Netanyahu has flouted US warnings and insisted that he plans to press ahead with a military invasion of Rafah, despite the devastatin­g impact on civilians.

But Netanyahu managed to put aside some of his anger at Biden: he did not recall the Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, who is currently visiting Washington with a long wishlist of US weapons that Israel wants to

 ?? ?? ‘The UN resolution was approved after Biden’s administra­tion dropped its veto threat and lifted its diplomatic cover for Israel, at least temporaril­y.’ Photograph: John Lamparski/Getty Images
‘The UN resolution was approved after Biden’s administra­tion dropped its veto threat and lifted its diplomatic cover for Israel, at least temporaril­y.’ Photograph: John Lamparski/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States