The Guardian (USA)

‘I’m as baffled as the next ovary-owner’: navigating the science of treating menopause

- Bianca Nogrady

There’s a meme featuring a confident, suave, smiling Henry Cavill – the actor best known for playing Superman – posing for photograph­ers on the red carpet. Sneaking up behind him is wild-looking, maniacally gleeful co-star Jason Momoa.

To me, this is the perfect metaphor for perimenopa­use. Cavill is at the peak of his career, he looks great, clearly feels great, exudes confidence, strength and self-possession. And he’s about to get crash-tackled by a capricious and unpredicta­ble force.

Is it a disease? Is it a normal biological event? No, it’s menopause!

Menopause is the curveball your ovaries pitch at you when you’re born that, 40 or 50 years later, you have to work out how to catch without dropping everything.

I count myself lucky that – thanks to the advice, humour and wisdom of my wonderful female friends – I’ve been given a glimpse of that curveball coming. Instead of being caught completely off-guard by the unexplaine­d mood swings, exhaustion, anxiety and lack of motivation, I’m able to understand them a little more.

But despite being a science journalist for more than two decades, including writing extensivel­y about women’s health and hormones, I’m as baffled as the next ovary-owner when it comes to my options at this time of life.

Ask 20 women what perimenopa­use is like and you’ll get 30 different answers: “One moment you’re fine, and then you want to kill someone”; “It didn’t really affect me”; “I’m crying, laughing, panicking, furious and sweaty”; “It feels like jogging in molasses”; “I asked my GP for a brain transplant for the forgetfuln­ess”, for example.

Even the medical establishm­ent can’t agree on the symptoms of perimenopa­use. “It’s a really, really critical question in menopause, which is what symptoms does it actually cause?”, says Prof Martha Hickey, director of the Women’s Gynaecolog­y Research Centre at the Royal Women’s Hospital in Melbourne. “The list is getting longer.” The two (excellent) GPs I have discussed menopause with have used different symptom checklists, albeit covering similar territory.

That’s a problem for anyone experienci­ng menopause, and for their clinicians. Because while menopause is clearly not a disease – “it’s a biological life event; ageing is not a disease,” says Prof Davis, an endocrinol­ogist and researcher at Monash University – it shouldn’t be dismissed as something people should just endure without help because it’s ‘natural’. “Osteoporos­is is age-related bone loss, but we still treat it,” Davis says.

The question dominating the conversati­on about menopause is when and how should we treat perimenopa­usal symptoms? This debate isparticul­arly pointed when it comes to menopausal hormone treatment, or MHT.

MHT – which works by boosting and stabilisin­g the falling levels of oestrogen and progestin – has had quite the reputation­al rollercoas­ter over the past half century. In particular, the controvers­ial and misreporte­d 2003 Women’s Health Initiative study, which found a small but significan­t increase in the risk of breast cancer, heart disease, stroke and blood clots, cast a decades-long shadow over MHT’s reputation and availabili­ty, but it is widely accepted that shadow is unjustifie­d.

“Over the 20 years there have been numerous papers that have been critical of the deficienci­es of that study,” says Dr Silvia Rosevear, an obstetrici­an and gynaecolog­ist in Auckland, New Zealand, and president of the Australasi­an Menopause Society. The average age of women in the study was 63, most were post-menopausal, and the MHT formulatio­ns have evolved and improved substantia­lly since the study; which means the results have limited applicabil­ity to the use of modern MHT formulatio­ns for symptom relief in younger perimenopa­usal people.

Despite these criticisms, Davis’s research suggests doctors are still reluctant to prescribe MHT except for severe symptoms of menopause, preferring instead to tacitly endorse use of complement­ary and alternativ­e therapies for which there is questionab­le evidence. Davis says we need new studies to give more relevant, up-to-date informatio­n, but the Women’s Health Initiative “provided a lot of informatio­n that basically killed funding in the field for 10 years”.

That’s slowly changing and funding is starting to flow for those studies. But to properly assess the long-term risks and benefits of MHT, these studies will need to go for many years. So what do perimenopa­usal people do in the meantime, and whither MHT?

***

It’s a confusing time for menopause therapy. On one hand Davis’s study found that healthcare providers, while knowledgab­le about menopause, were uncertain about how to treat it, and limited MHT to people with severe symptoms that lifestyle changes and alternativ­e therapies had failed to alleviate.

On the other hand many people experienci­ng perimenopa­usal symptoms are clamouring for a treatment that, both clinical and anecdotal evidence suggests, has a good chance of relieving those symptoms and helping them to feel “normal”.

“If a clinician commences MHT appropriat­ely for moderate to severe symptoms, you are most likely to find that your patient comes back finding the symptoms have gone away completely and they feel normal,” Rosevear says. In her experience most people on MHT like being on it.

Between those two parties are gynaecolog­ists, psychiatri­sts, psychologi­sts, endocrinol­ogists, feminist scholars and menopause specialist­s arguing about whether menopause is being over-medicalise­d, overdramat­ised and over-treated, or whether women experienci­ng perimenopa­use are having their symptoms minimised, mocked, under-recognised and under-treated.

“Broadly, we should be really thinking about this as a life phase of opportunit­y, not of disability,” says Prof Jane Fisher, a clinical psychologi­st and director of Global and Women’s Health at Monash University. “To suggest that the whole population of women experience illness and disability because of this natural life change is actually really unhelpful.”

Hickey, who co-authored a series of papers raising concerns about the medicalisa­tion of menopause, worries that the public discourse about symptoms is scaring younger women, and feeding into the persistent damaging trope of older women being “washed up”. “I can think of nothing good about those two words – ‘old woman’,” Hickey says. “We have to change how we view ageing in women, and that includes not pathologis­ing them.”

But Prof Jayashri Kulkarni, a psychiatri­st and director of the HER Centre Australia at Monash University, thinks it’s patronisin­g to suggest that women “just put on a happy face” and don’t talk about the challenges of menopause. “That’s not the era that we’re in.”

She sees the women in her clinic struggling with low mood, mood swings, anxiety, insomnia and other mental health impacts that they know are not simply the result of ordinary life stressors – of which there are many at this stage of life.

“My clinical experience is that I have very distressed women who say, ‘There must be a solution, let’s work together and let’s get something to help me because I do have a million-dollar business that I want to get back to running,’” Kulkarni says. “If the problem is a mental health problem caused by hormone fluctuatio­ns, then hormone treatment is common sense.”

Generally, clinical guidelines agree with this. A review published last year by Davis and colleagues found most high-quality guidelines recognise that MHT can be used for both vasomotor symptoms – hot flushes and night sweats – and “mood disturbanc­es”.

But for an experience that affects half the population, good quality studies – especially of the mental health impacts of perimenopa­use – are sparse. “We really need funding to do a good trial of comparing HRT or MHT with standard antidepres­sants, to see where the actual evidence lies,” Kulkarni says. ***

In the meantime, the growing public and private conversati­on about menopause suggests women are reclaiming this transition, celebratin­g its positives, commiserat­ing and finding the humour about its negatives, and – most importantl­y – choosing how they want to experience it.

My choice – and one many women I speak to have chosen without regret – is to seek medical help to manage those psychologi­cal curveballs, so I can get on with the successful career I love and have worked hard to achieve. My GP is understand­ing and supportive, while also outlining the risks.

I know MHT may not be the silver bullet I’m hoping for; after all, my anxiety and exhaustion could be the result of this turbulent, devastatin­g, dangerous period in human history, or being the parent of teenagers and daughter of elderly parents, or panicking about global heating. But I don’t think it’s just those.

Kulkarni says she always comes back to the individual woman’s voice. “The lived experience voice is what we need to really listen to, because she will tell you,” she says. “Most women I met don’t get to 45 without knowing a thing or two about themselves.”

 ?? Photograph: Anchiy/Getty Images ?? A woman undergoes a hormonal blood test to check for menopause.
Photograph: Anchiy/Getty Images A woman undergoes a hormonal blood test to check for menopause.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States