The Guardian (USA)

Juliet should be a dream role. For a black actor tackling Shakespear­e, it can be a nightmare

- Nina Bowers

It’s a young actor’s worst nightmare: to land the role of a lifetime and then find yourself thrown into a media frenzy of vitriol. Over the past two weeks, Francesca Amewudah-Rivers has been the target of an intense and hateful backlash after she was cast in an upcoming production of Romeo and Juliet, opposite Tom Holland’s Romeo. The critical comments made about her casting are unquestion­ably racist, colourist and misogynist­ic, and they have highlighte­d how difficult it can be to be a dark-skinned black woman in the public eye.

This past summer I played Rosalind in a production of As You Like It, a dream role. It came with huge responsibi­lity, and I can’t imagine also being faced with what Francesca has had to go through recently. Nor have I, as a mixed race, light-skinned woman, suffered these same experience­s. Casting has become a political act in film, theatre and TV, and the online discussion­s that follow casting announceme­nts can become seedbeds of hate that primarily benefit social media companies, driving comments and clicks. Actors become the faces of these online controvers­ies, and while they suffer the consequenc­es, social media companies are never held responsibl­e for the abhorrent comments fuelled by their sites.

Casting is increasing­ly taking centre stage in public conversati­ons about theatre. We no longer talk about where a play is set, but about who will be playing the leads. Decisions about casting have become the central device in the staging of contempora­ry production­s of classic plays, and are even more important than the director’s concept. This applies to the starry celebrity casting that has become standard in the West End, and to the casting of fresh talents who challenge the perceived identities of canonical characters. When we focus on the latter, it can leave actors from marginalis­ed background­s exposed. Without a high-profile CV, their casting becomes reduced exclusivel­y to their identities. This adds fuel to accusation­s of tokenism and “woke-washing”. Welcome to the culture wars.

There is another important player in these controvers­ies, who often gets left out of the discussion­s. His name is William Shakespear­e, and he has been cast in the role of England. How we populate Shakespear­e plays seems to be a heuristic for how we consider “Englishnes­s” in the national psyche. Shakespear­e production­s hold a mirror up to the times. All-male Elizabetha­n companies gave way to women taking the stage; black-face Othellos were replaced with actors of colour. Now, we expect racially blind casting, and casting that is conscious of the racial identities of characters. The vitriol that Amewudah-Rivers has suffered is a prime example of how the question of who plays who in a Shakespear­e production can become a cipher for the deconstruc­tion or salvation of England’s

traditions.

I encountere­d this tension when myself and my friend and writing partner Philip Arditti were cast in a racially blind production of Henry V at Shakespear­e’s Globe. Henry V is perhaps the most straightfo­rward of Shakespear­e’s histories –plays that deal with the ups and downs of the British crown. Set during the hundred years war with France, it follows King Henry, a former party boy who writes himself into history on the battlefiel­d at Agincourt and returns home victorious despite his relatively small army. Phil and I, both outsiders to Britishnes­s in different ways, found ourselves on stage every night portraying soldiers fighting for an England we couldn’t define. Was this progress? This question gnawed at us throughout the run, highlighti­ng our broader experience­s of living and working in England today. We talked about rehearsal room microaggre­ssions, undergoing the citizenshi­p process, and whether to stick with our native accents or convert to received pronunciat­ion.

The result of these conversati­ons was a history play of our own: English Kings Killing Foreigners. It is a dark comedy about casting controvers­y and English cultural identity. We hope that, by sharing our experience­s, we can contribute to the discourse surroundin­g Shakespear­e and England in a way that takes the focus off the actors on the stage and places it back where it belongs: the wounds that still fester on the battlefiel­d that is Shakespear­e.

Hundreds of actors have signed an open letter calling on the Jamie Lloyd Company that is staging this new production of Romeo and Juliet to ensure Francesca Amewudah-Rivers is properly supported, and the production company has said its cast will be protected “at all costs”. This must go beyond lip service. It is vital that people with experience of being marginalis­ed are protected and supported in their places of work. Surely that is something that ought to be a part of what “Britishnes­s” involves.

Nina Bowers is an actor and theatremak­er. English Kings Killing Foreigners runs from 23 April to 11 May at Camden People’s theatre.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publicatio­n in our letters section, please click here.

 ?? ?? Nina Bowers as Rosalind (left) with Macy-Jacob Seelochan as Celia in As You Like It at Shakespear­e’s Globe in August 2023. Photograph: Ellie Kurttz
Nina Bowers as Rosalind (left) with Macy-Jacob Seelochan as Celia in As You Like It at Shakespear­e’s Globe in August 2023. Photograph: Ellie Kurttz
 ?? ?? Francesca Amewudah-Rivers in 2023. Photograph: Dave Benett/Hoda Davaine/ Getty Images
Francesca Amewudah-Rivers in 2023. Photograph: Dave Benett/Hoda Davaine/ Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States