The Guardian (USA)

Vermont poised to become first US state to charge big oil for climate damage

- Dharna Noor

Vermont is poised to pass a groundbrea­king measure forcing major polluting companies to help pay for damages caused by the climate crisis, in a move being closely watched by other states including New York and California.

Modeled after the Environmen­tal

Protection Agency’s Superfund program, which forces companies to pay for toxic waste cleanup, the climate superfund bill would charge major fossil fuel companies doing business within the state billions of dollars for their past emissions.

The measure would make Vermont the first US state to hold fossil fuel companies liable for their planet-heating pollution.

“If you contribute­d to a mess, you should play a role in cleaning it up,” Elena Mihaly, vice-president of the Conservati­on Law Foundation’s Vermont chapter, which is campaignin­g for the bill, said in an interview.

If passed, the bill will face a steep uphill battle in the courts. But supporters say the first-of-its-kind legislatio­n could be a model for the rest of the country.

Four other states are weighing similar initiative­s. Senators Bernie Sanders from Vermont and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland also attempted to include a federal version in the infrastruc­ture bill passed in 2022, though it was omitted from the final draft. (The measure would have raised $500bn.)

Advocates for the Vermont bill notched a major win on Friday when the state’s house of representa­tives advanced the measure with a preliminar­y vote of 100-33 – enough support to overcome a potential veto by the state’s Republican governor, Phil Scott. On Monday, the bill passed the House in a 94-38 vote.

Within the next week, it will receive a final vote in the senate, where it received preliminar­y approval on a 26-3

vote last month. It will then head to Governor Scott’s desk for final approval; if he shoots it down, supporters are confident that they have the votes to override a veto.

“Climate impacts are mounting everywhere and they’re coming with a price tag” said Jamie Henn, director of Fossil Free Media, which is campaignin­g in support of climate superfund legislatio­n across the US. “Of course we’re going to see efforts to force the companies responsibl­e for disasters to pick up the bill.”

Climate impacts

Vermont is known for its temperate summers, but last July, catastroph­ic floods pummeled the state. Roads became rivers, bridges were decimated and two people were killed by the rushing waters.

“It was devastatin­g,” said Mihaly.

She is originally from California, a state that has seen widespread devastatio­n from wildfires and other climate-related disasters. “I had before considered Vermont a haven, a safe choice from a climate perspectiv­e. Last summer was a wake-up call,” she said.

The floods wreaked more than $1bn in damages, just 11 years after Tropical Storm Irene devastated nearly all of Vermont. As the climate crisis persists, research shows future flooding events could be even more devastatin­g and costly.

The legislatio­n would compel Vermont’s state treasurer, Mike Pieciak – who supports the effort – to set up a fund for climate damages. To do so, he would be required to determine how much money to collect to pay for climate-related impacts to Vermont’s public health, biodiversi­ty, economic developmen­t and other damages. (The bill text does not include a specific figure to be collected, but an initial rough estimate from the Vermont

Public Interest Research Group suggests the figure could be as much as $2.5 bn.)

The state would also have to work with scientists to figure out how much of that damage is attributab­le to climate change. Then, officials would calculate how much each major oil and gas company within the state contribute­d to it, based on the emissions from their products between 1995 and 2024. To do so, they would use the Carbon Majors database – an account of the world’s largest polluters’ contributi­ons to the climate crisis.

The money collected would be used to fund projects to improve climate adaptation and resilience, as determined by the state’s Agency of Natural Resources.

A new model for liability

If passed, the measure could serve as a model for the rest of the country as interest in climate accountabi­lity is growing, and as New York, California, Maryland and Massachuse­tts weigh similar initiative­s.

New York’s measure, which would collect $30bn, sailed through the state’s senate this week after being omitted from the state’s budget earlier this year. Advocates are now hoping for a full state assembly vote before the session ends on 6 June.

“While New Yorkers brace for the rising and costly impacts of climate change, fossil fuel profiteers are reaping record profits,” said Eric Weltman, senior New York organizer with the environmen­tal group Food and Water Watch. “It’s time these big oil corporatio­ns paid to clean up their mess.”

Meanwhile, the California measure will face a challengin­g vote in a in senate committee next week. Massachuse­tts’ and Maryland’s measures have stalled.

All five states considerin­g climate superfund bills have also filed lawsuits against big oil for allegedly attempting to sow doubt about the climate crisis despite longstandi­ng knowledge of the dangers of burning fossil fuels. But unlike the lawsuits, the legislativ­e proposals do not requite proof of that history of deception.

“This bill is not about punishing big oil for deceiving the public,” said Mihaly.

Spreading knowledge of that deception, however, has helped build support for the measure. During a state senate committee vote on the bill in March, for instance, the Republican senator Robert Norris said he was initially “hesitant” about the bill but chose to support it after learning about the fossil fuel industry’s misinforma­tion campaigns.

“I was not aware … the large companies knew about this in the 50s and 60s and so forth and still did nothing to address this,” he said.

Jennifer Rushlow, dean of the Maverick Lloyd School for the Environmen­t at Vermont Law and Graduate School, noted that the lawsuits have often run into “roadblocks” when judges question whether or not the litigation should be the purview of legislator­s rather than courts.

“In that way, the climate superfund bills are a well-designed response to the challenges many climate lawsuits have faced,” said Rushlow, who has campaigned for the bill.

The bills enjoy widespread support from voters, said Cassidy DiPaola, communicat­ions director at Fossil Free Media. April surveys conducted by her organizati­on and the polling firm Data for Progress found that 70% of likely California voters would support a climate superfund bill, while 66% of all likely US voters would support such a measure, as would 89% of Democrats.

Court challenges

If the Vermont bill becomes law, fossil fuel interests are expected to challenge it in the state’s courts, the bill’s detractors have noted.

“We’re a mosquito compared to a giant,” the Vermont senator Randy Brock, a Republican who voted against the bill, said on the Senate floor last month. “ExxonMobil alone has an annual sales of $344.6bn, and Vermont has an annual budget of about $8.5bn.”

Governor Scott has not said whether or not he would veto the measure. But he has voiced concern about the state facing steep litigation costs.

The American Petroleum Institute, the largest oil and gas lobby group in the US, sent a letter to the Vermont senate opposing the bill, claiming it “retroactiv­ely imposes costs and liability on prior activities that were legal” and “violates equal protection and due process rights by holding companies responsibl­e for the actions of society at large”.

But Rushlow said to avoid “damaging litigation”, lawmakers had worked to write a “good solid law where the legislatur­e makes clear what they want other branches of government to do”.

Mihaly said supporters had worked to build a “robust record to demonstrat­e that there’s a rational basis for this law”, adding that the Vermont attorney general, Charity Clark, supported the bill and said her office was “ready to proudly defend the law”.

Climate impacts are mounting everywhere and they’re coming with a price tag

Jamie Henn, director of Fossil Free Media

 ?? Photograph: Steven Senne/AP ?? A married couple use a canoe to remove surgical supplies from a flood-damaged veterinary center in Montpelier, Vermont, on 11 July 2023.
Photograph: Steven Senne/AP A married couple use a canoe to remove surgical supplies from a flood-damaged veterinary center in Montpelier, Vermont, on 11 July 2023.
 ?? Cj Gunther/EPA ?? A car swept up in flood waters in Montpelier, Vermont, on 11 July 2023. Photograph:
Cj Gunther/EPA A car swept up in flood waters in Montpelier, Vermont, on 11 July 2023. Photograph:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States