The Maui News

Stop voter suppressio­n

- ■ Editorial from the Des Moines Register

Iowa’s Republican state lawmakers have apparently won so big they’re tired of winning.

Why else would they insist on tinkering with Iowa’s election system?

It is the system that recently delivered the GOP stronger majorities in the Iowa Legislatur­e, five out of six seats in the U.S. Congress and six Electoral College votes, in consecutiv­e elections, for former President Donald Trump.

Yet the legislativ­e victors insist — again this session — that voting reforms are needed.

So lawmakers pushed through legislatio­n that would shorten Iowa’s early voting period, reduce Election Day voting by an hour and create a stricter deadline for returning absentee ballots.

The goal of GOP lawmakers is obvious: Make it more difficult for Iowans to cast ballots.

That was the goal in 2017 when they rammed through an unnecessar­y voter ID law to supposedly respond to nonexisten­t fraud. It has been the goal ever since — when legislator­s pushed to ban satellite voting on college campuses and stood pat on keeping people once convicted of felonies disenfranc­hised.

But their latest voter suppressio­n efforts seem to be driven by an orchestrat­ed national effort by the GOP to erect state-level barriers to voting. Hundreds of bills aimed at election procedures and voting access have been introduced in statehouse­s across the country this year.

During a recent legislativ­e hearing, Adams County Auditor Becky Bissell, a Republican, said, “Smaller rural counties have a large elderly population who typically choose to vote absentee because of weather or health concerns. Why are we making it harder for them to vote?”

Good question. And it’s particular­ly odd considerin­g rural voters tend to favor Republican­s. Who can put a stop to such shenanigan­s?

The U.S. Congress.

The U.S. House recently passed H.R. 1, also referred to as the For the People Act.

The legislatio­n requires states to offer mail-in ballots, same-day voter registrati­on and early voting. It includes mandatory automatic voter registrati­on and restoratio­n of voting rights to people who complete felony sentences. It would make it more difficult for states to eliminate inactive voters from the rolls.

Top-down directives like this should be infrequent. But Congress rightly steps in when civil rights are at stake, as it did with the Voting

Rights Act of 1965, and it’s time to do it again.

Further, none of those measures should even be controvers­ial.

Republican­s should support this legislatio­n. They should want to preserve the election system in Iowa that landed them their jobs in Congress. They should want to ensure their constituen­ts can exercise their constituti­onal right to vote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States