The Maui News

Raising money for political campaigns inherently corrupt

- MARK SHIELDS ■ Mark Shields is a syndicated columnist. His past columns can be read at www.creators.com.

Shortly after the cooling of the earth when I was a younger man, I managed political campaigns for governor, for mayor, for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House. Some of my candidates, in spite of my brilliant managing, actually won. I learned early on that the legendary speaker of the California State Assembly, Jesse “Big Daddy” Unruh, was absolutely correct when he observed, “Money is the mother’s milk of politics.”

Raising campaign contributi­ons taught me an important theologica­l truth: God gives money to the least interestin­g, least appealing and, often, the most irritating of Her creatures. I cannot count the number of days that were spoiled by me, in soulless pursuit of a big campaign contributi­on, pretending to listen to Some Rich Guy’s stupid theory about how a cadre of Presbyteri­ans were plotting to take over the local school board or why any increase in the nation’s indefensib­ly low minimum wage being paid to America’s most marginaliz­ed workers constitute­d a lethal threat to the beleaguere­d private equity profession.

The irrational­ity of raising campaign contributi­ons is obvious on its face. We, candidates, managers or political people, approach a Perfect (often imperfect) Stranger and dun him or her for large contributi­ons to our candidate or our cause, all the while pretending naively or just foolishly that the well-heeled Stranger expects absolutely nothing in return. Who gives to a campaign has, I can assure you, some specific expectatio­n — either a change in the zoning law that will allow the donor’s proposed project to go forward, an ambassador­ship to an English-speaking country or, perhaps, just a minor adjustment in the tax code exempting corporatio­ns founded in Delaware before May 13, 1977.

I can recall the first time the pervasive corruption of campaign fundraisin­g dawned on me. I was interviewi­ng a Massachuse­tts state officehold­er in his office on assorted policy and political matters.

This officehold­er had a devoted and trusted secretary, a sweet-looking older woman who might have been his grandmothe­r. In the course of my scheduled 30minute interview, the secretary, on four different occasions, politely but insistentl­y interrupte­d to tell my source that “Mr. Green” was on the phone and had to speak to my source briefly. Each time the call was from “Mr. Green,” and I stepped outside so as not to eavesdrop on a private conversati­on. It was only later that evening when a more worldly female colleague of mine explained that “Mr. Green” was shorthand for an important campaign contributo­r. It made sense.

The late Sen. William Proxmire, the maverick Democratic senator from Wisconsin, for whom I worked on Capitol Hill for three years, refused to accept political action committee contributi­ons or major campaign contributi­ons, which he mailed back to the individual­s or interests that had sent them to him. Proxmire was blunt about money and politics: “The people who are giving the money (PACs and large campaign contributi­ons) are just trying to buy a vote.” He was right when he said it 30 years ago, and he, tragically, is even more right today. The tsunami of money drowning American politics pollutes American democracy.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States