The Maui News

THE STATE OF ALOHA

- BEN LOWENTHAL

Itwas around 2 in the morning when “the opihi” suddenly died. James Wakatsuki got his nickname for sticking to his guns in the face of overwhelmi­ng opposition and howling dissent. He was among that near mythic generation of Japanese Americans in Hawai‘i, who grew up in the middle of the territoria­l years, served honorably in World War II and committed himself to public service in the islands.

He went to college and law school on the Mainland thanks to the GI Bill. He came home, joined the Democratic Party and started his law practice in Kalihi. Then he got into politics. By 1975, he was the speaker of the state House of Representa­tives.

But that was not where he was working when he died of liver failure. In 1992, Justice Wakatsuki was an associate justice on the Hawai‘i Supreme Court. He was a stalwart guardian of civil liberties and fiercely independen­t. He was also the last of his generation to serve on that court.

His death meant that Gov. John Waihee would get to appoint all five justices to the highest court in the islands. Appointing judges hasn’t changed much since 1978. The Hawai‘i Constituti­on requires an agency called the Judicial Selection Commission to produce a list of candidates and send it to the governor. From that list, the governor chooses the nominee subject to Senate confirmati­on.

Gov. Waihee’s first pick for the job rocked Hawai‘i’s tight-knit legal community. Sharon Himeno didn’t apply for the position. Someone nominated her to the commission, and the commission put her on the list of candidates to the governor.

She and the governor wanted a smooth confirmati­on. She told the press she hoped Hawai‘i was “at the stage where any applicant is judged on his or her own qualificat­ions, and not who they are married to.” Her husband, you see, was Warren Price, the governor’s former attorney general. Himeno’s hopes were dashed. The backlash was swift and unforgivin­g. In an editorial, environmen­tal lawyer David Kimo Frankel asked this:

“What has this wealthy attorney done for the poor, women, Native Hawaiians, workers or the environmen­t? She was not one of the hundreds of attorneys who were honored for their free legal services to the needy in 1991. Himeno’s legal career demonstrat­es that she cares more about the rights of powerful vested interests.”

He also wrote that Himeno’s father was a real estate developer who had profited from dealings with the state. His company, for example, sold the state’s Employees Retirement System a property for $26 million after he had purchased it for $23 million. And, wrote Frankel, Himeno’s law firm represente­d the ERS in other land deals.

Himeno had her backers, too. Lawyers were writing letters to newspapers in the weeks that followed. Former Senate Judiciary Committee Chairperso­n Clayton Hee wrote about her humility, her legal qualities, tolerance and “love for our land and its people.”

She also had the public support of labor unions, former Gov. William Quinn and attorneys from some of the biggest and most prestigiou­s firms in Honolulu. Those in her camp correctly pointed out that this nomination would make her the first woman on the court since Rhoda Lewis retired in 1967, and argued that the backlash was a setback for women attorneys.

Those opposing the nomination, however, were just as impressive. Civil rights attorney Dan Foley, Congresswo­man Pasty Mink, and retired justice and labor lawyer, Ed Nakamura, came out publicly against the nomination.

It all came to a head when she appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Some cried foul, claiming that the hearing was rushed and the chairperso­n, a Himeno supporter, was absent because he couldn’t attend. It didn’t matter in the end though. The majority on the committee voted against her. She would not make it through the Senate. This kind of thing just didn’t happen in Hawai‘i politics, where people strove for consensus and avoided confrontat­ion.

Gov. Waihee regrouped. About a month after the Senate rejection, he appointed another woman. Paula Nakayama was a trial judge with a solid reputation. Before that she was a partner in a reputable firm and was a Honolulu prosecutor.

Her nomination and confirmati­on were smooth in contrast to Himeno. Justice Nakayama has served on the Hawai‘i Supreme Court ever since. She led the court on important decisions emphasizin­g Hawai‘i’s commitment to the public trust doctrine and preservati­on of water and natural resources. Her writing is clear, crisp and provides some much-needed guidance for judges and lawyers.

It’s been nearly three decades since the Himeno nomination divided lawyers, prompted vicious letter-writing campaigns and served as a preview to our fractured political times — even in Hawai‘i.

Now, the current governor is expected to pick two justices in the coming year. Time will tell if the specter of the Himeno nomination will haunt us. Ben Lowenthal is a trial and appellate lawyer, currently with the Office of the Public Defender, who grew up on Maui. His email is 808stateof­aloha@gmail.com.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States