The Mendocino Beacon

Is there really a difference between masks?

- By Dr. William Miller

To help keep the Mendocino Coast Community informed of Coronaviru­s updates, Dr. William Miller, Mendocino Coast District Hospital Chief of Staff; and Tabatha Miller, Fort Bragg City Manager (no relation), have teamed up for The Miller Report, a hyperlocal, weekly column on the progress of COVID-19 within our community. The two Millers will be trading off writing the column each week; this week is part two of a short series from Dr. Miller.

Any discussion about different materials for masks can get pretty complicate­d looking at size of pores versus size of virus particles, versus electrosta­tic charges of different materials, versus thread counts, etc. However, last week we looked at two very convincing epidemiolo­gic studies that suggest that any type of mask that fully covers the mouth and nose is highly effective in blocking transmissi­on of respirator­y viruses, regardless of the material, especially if both people are wearing a mask. So, in that context, a valid question is, “Should we really worry about what the mask ismade of?” And the simple answer is, “Probably not.”

A few definition­s will be helpful. First, a “medicalgra­de mask” ismade of layers of paper and is disposable. A “surgeon’s mask” is a medical-grade mask that ties behind the head and neck while an “isolation mask” usually has ear loops to hold it in place. This is because it is easier to safely remove a contaminat­ed mask by lifting off the ear loops instead of fiddling around with a knot to untie.

Medical grade masks also usually come with a small wire or metal strip along the top so that the mask can be fitted better over the bridge of the nose so as to reduce fogging of one’s glasses. Some medical masks also have a thin adhesive over the bridge of the nose for the same purpose.

However, the material that the mask is made of is generally the same. A “cloth mask” refers to any of a number of designs made at home by anyone who is handy with a sewing machine. An N-95, as we will discuss in more detail later, is a particular­ly thick mask, also known as a “respirator”, that is designed to filter out very fine dust particles or aerosols. N-95s are made for medical use as well as use in constructi­on settings and workshops.

Personally, I think that the most important elements of a good mask are that it be comfortabl­e to wear and even more importantl­y, comfortabl­e to breathe through. For example, one of the problems with an N-95 mask is that it takes extra work to breathe through which can be fatiguing after a while. Also, if the mask doesn’t fit well and you are always having to reach up to readjust it, then that is not good, or even worse is when it constantly falls down. The same goes for a mask that leads to your glasses fogging up all the time.

All of these annoyances will lead to people avoiding wearing the mask and that circumvent­s the point which is to have everyone wearing a mask when around others outside of your social bubble.

Most of the research comparing different mask materials has been in protecting against influenza. Since these two viruses, COVID-19 and influenza, are very similar in size and means of transmissi­on, then these studies are useful. I think one of the best such study was published in the British Medical Journal in 2015 in which a comparison was made of influenza transmissi­on in 1,607 healthcare workers in 14 different hospitals between thosewho wore cloth masks and those that wore medical-grade masks.

This study did show a reduction in the risk of catching influenza if a medicalgra­de mask was used over a cloth mask. However, one potential shortcomin­g in the study is that the medical-grade masks were disposed of daily, while the cloth mask were reused. Also, the cloth masks were made of layers of gauze which has a very lowdensity of threads per inch. However, both types of masks did significan­tly reduce the risk of influenza, with the medical-grade mask performing better.

Based on this and similar studies, current guidelines are that healthcare workers taking care of patients should wear medical grade masks. Translatin­g that to a recommenda­tion for the general public is difficult given the more casual encounters that occur while passing each other in a grocery store aisle versus being a nurse caring for an ill, hospitaliz­ed patient in close contact. Incidental­ly, the study showed that masks combined with strict handwashin­g was significan­tly more protective against infection than masks alone.

Another interestin­g study, forwarded to me by another Dr. Miller, in this case our local psychologi­st Dr. Richard Miller, looked at different cloth fabrics and their ability to trap small droplets and particles in the laboratory. This was done by researcher­s at the University of Wisconsin and published in the journal of the American Chemical Society in May. In this study, they compared different fabrics including cotton, flannel, silk and various synthetic fibers along with different combinatio­ns of each aswell as varying fabric density (ie., thread count and thickness).

They found that double-layered masks are more effective than single layer, no surprise there, but that varying the fabrics of the two layers was better than two layers of the same fabric. The best combinatio­ns appear to be cotton-silk, cotton-chiffon, and cotton-flannel. Also, higher thread counts were associated with better performanc­e, once again no surprise there, but that there wasn’t much benefit beyond 600 threads per inch. This is important because most of us would find it difficult to breathe through a thread count much above that.

N-95 facemasks are not really advised for the general public. The reason is that themain transmissi­on of viruses like SARS-2 is from respirator­y droplets which are much larger than aerosols. N-95s are designed to trap much smaller particles called aerosols. Aerosols are really a concern in medical and dental settings where procedures such as high-speed dental drills or medication nebulizers create large amounts of aerosols. In those settings, an N-95 is required. However, once again for casual encounters in the general public, such a mask is really overkill inmy opinion. Plus, they are much more difficult to breathe through because of their constructi­on needing to trap the smaller particle.

N-95s are commonly found in hardware stores with a one-way mechanical valve. These masks are designed to trap small dust particles such as from woodworkin­g or metal polishing. As I mentioned, N95s are difficult to breath through, so for workshop applicatio­ns many come with a one-way valve that makes it easier to exhale.

However, since our public health strategy in maskwearin­g is mainly to prevent people who are infected with the virus from spreading it to others, then masks with one-way valves are not as effective. Similarly, simply wearing a plastic face shield without a mask does not cut it at all as your breath simply cascades all around the face shield. Healthcare workers wear these in addition to our masks to reduce the risk of splashes into the eyes and not to take the place of a mask.

Aswe saw in last week’s article, science supports that masks are a very effective part of our public health strategy to limit this epidemic. In the end, it probably doesn’t matter which type of mask you choose to wear. Again, if is comfortabl­e, fits well on your face to cover both nose and mouth, and is easy to breathe through then that is enough.

I think that for themost part, people now get the need for wearing a mask in public. However, we still have new cases and a lot of those are due to social gatherings, especially parties and family gettogethe­rs, where theremay be great social pressure not to wear a mask. If you venture outside of your social bubble togo to a party or other large gathering, you better bewearing a mask. Do it not only for yourself, but for the rest of us.

The sooner we get this pandemic behind us, the sooner we can go back to social and economic normalcy. And, thank you to all of you who do wear your mask.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States