The Mendocino Beacon

PG&E Probation Problems; Redistrict­ing Update

- By Jim Shields

Federal Judge Says PG&E May Have Violated Probation

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) apparently is once more in violation of its probation according to the federal judge overseeing the troubled electrical giant.

This past September, the Shasta County D.A.’s Office filed criminal charges against PG&E in connection with the Zogg fire that left four people dead.

Cal Fire investigat­ors found that a tree toppled into PG&E overhead power lines, which ignited the firestorm that burned 56,000-plus acres, destroying more than 200 structures.

Back in 2017, PG&E was placed on probation following the deadly 2010 San Bruno gas line explosion. This week PG&E’s probation officer stated, “There is probable cause to believe that the company while under probation violated the general condition of probation that they not commit another federal, state or local crime.

Federal Judge William Alsup, who is in charge of the utility’s probation, found probable cause of the utility violating the conditions of its supervisio­n. As a result, the judge could extend that probation period — ending next year — or revoke the sentence and re-sentence PG&E.

Stephanie Bridgett, Shasta County’s district attorney, said in late September that PG&E “was reckless and criminally negligent” because it had not removed the tree that caused the Zogg Fire.

Just a few weeks ago, Judge Alsup issued a request to PG&E for a final report asking what progress the utility company has made during its probation to improve public safety for both their gas and electric divisions. Alsup also wants PG&E to explain the reasons it has started wildfires and what it has done to prevent future fires.

According to Reclaim Our Power, which is part of a coalition of California organizati­ons that watchdogs the California Public Utilities Commission, PG&E’s problems continue to mount, as five counties filed lawsuits recently “for damages from the catastroph­ic Dixie Fire that the utility admits it likely caused. PG&E faces criminal charges from fires in 2019, 2020, and 2021 as well as revelation­s that hedge funds have taken billions in profits while fire survivors continue to be given slow, incomplete access to funds to recover damages caused by PG&E.”

Speaking of PG&E, here’s a suggestion by Laytonvill­e’s Robin Thomposon, a profession­al lumber grader, regarding what can be done with some of the trees being removed around the utility’s overhead infrastruc­ture. Thompson sent his recommenda­tion to 3rd District Supervisor John Haschak. Hi John,

A concerted effort could have been made — by county administra­tion, working with PG&E — to save all the merchantib­le softwood timber during the PG&E line clearing. Homeowners could then be paid stumpage at the mill, same as any timberland owner. Truckers & local mills would have benefitted. The whole program would have been more palatable to all that way… I had a gorgeous, long, commercial­ly valuable fir log that I had to ask 4 different crew chiefs to leave alone. I come back, it’s been cut up: a 7 here, a 5 there, meaningles­s, ruinous short lengths! Does PG&E run this county or do we? Micromille­rs had no chance to work or cooperate with PG&E. Softwood timbers, they could have produced, are quite valuable. Softwood plants from here to the border would lick their chops over all the gorgeous, mature & “grandfathe­r” material that COULD HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE with a little fore thought, planning & implementa­tion. Please forward this to your colleagues.

Redistrict­ing Update

Since late summer a five-member Redistrict­ing Commission appointed by the Board of Supervisor­s has been meeting and holding remote teleconfer­ence meetings with the goal of using 2020 Census data to adjust and redraw existing supervisor­ial district boundaries.

Recently both the Laytonvill­e County Water District (LCWD) and Laytonvill­e Area Municipal Advisory Council (LAMAC) in separate meetings voted to recommend that the Board of Supervisor­s adopt either Draft Map #9 or Draft Map #10. It appeared that both proposed maps represente­d the best options for keeping as much of the current Laytonvill­e population as possible in the 3rd Supervisor­ial District.

Following the meetings of the LCWD and the LAMAC, the BOS met on Tuesday, Nov. 9, and received an update from staff and the Redistrict­ing Commission, and held a public workshop to receive public input on communitie­s of interest and potential district boundaries. The Commission reported that the town of Mendocino submitted 65 comments/ recommenda­tions, almost all opposing moving the town from the coastal 5th District to the equally coastal 4th District (Fort Bragg area). The second most public input came from the Laytonvill­e area, where approximat­ely 55 people submitted objections to being moved into the 4th District. Also at Tuesday’s meeting, the Supes voted to accept a new draft map, #12.

Maps 9, 10, and 12 all shared one feature in common for the 3rd District: approximat­ely one-half of the Spyrock community and all of the Bell Springs community, would be transferre­d into the 4th District.

The whole problem with the 3rd District is a numbers game, albeit a legal numbers game. The federal 10% disparity rule (which requires the population difference between the largest and smallest districts be less than 10%) should have an exemption for cases like ours where the result is an undoing of the goal to unite “communitie­s of interest,” which are defined as groups of people who live in a common geographic­al area and share common political, social or economic interests, which is certainly true of Laytonvill­e, Spyrock and Bell Springs.

At Tuesday’s’ redistrict­ing workshop, with all five Supes OKing Draft Map 12, which moves part of Spyrock and all of Bell Springs to District 4, and moves Hopland (at their request) from coastal District 5 to inland District 1. So Laytonvill­e’s fate is basically a done deal at next Thursday’s, Nov. 18, special meeting where the Supes are expected to approve Map #12.

Jim Shields is the Mendocino County Observer’s editor and publisher, observer@pacific.net, the long-time district manager of the Laytonvill­e County Water District, and is also chairman of the Laytonvill­e Area Municipal Advisory Council. Listen to his radio program “This and That” every Saturday at noon on KPFN 105.1 FM, also streamed live: http://www.kpfn.org

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States