The Mercury News Weekend

U.S. knew target was hospital

Unclear if analysis made its way to strike commanders

- By Ken Dilanian

WASHINGTON — American special operations analysts were gathering intelligen­ce on an Afghan hospital days before it was destroyed by a U.S. military attack because they believed it was being used by a Pakistani operative to coordinate Taliban activity, The Associated Press has learned.

It’s unclear whether commanders who unleashed the AC-130 gunship on the hospital — killing at least 22 patients and staff — were aware that the site was a hospital or knew about the allegation­s of possible enemy activity. The Pentagon initially said the attack was to protect U.S. troops engaged in a firefight and has since said it was a mistake.

The special operations analysts had assembled a dossier that included maps with the hospital circled, along with indication­s that intelligen­ce agencies were tracking the location of the Pakistani operative and activity reports based on overhead surveillan­ce, according to a former intelligen­ce official familiar with the material. The intelligen­ce suggested the hospital was being used as a Taliban command and control center and may have housed heavy weapons.

After the attack — which came amid a battle to retake the northern Afghan city of Kunduz from the Taliban — some U.S. analysts assessed that the strike had been justified, the former officer says. They concluded that the Pakistani, believed to have been working for his country’s Inter-Service Intelligen­ce directorat­e, had been killed.

No evidence has surfaced publicly to support those conclusion­s about the Pakistani’s connection­s or his demise. The former intelligen­ce official was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke only on condition of anonymity.

The top U.S. officer in Afghanista­n, Gen. John Campbell, has said the strike was a mistake, but he has not explained exactly how it happened or who granted final approval. He also told Congress he was ordering all personnel in Afghanista­n to be retrained on the rules governing the circumstan­ces under which strikes are acceptable.

The new details about the military’s suspicions that the hospital was being misused complicate an already murky picture and add to the unanswered questions about one of the worst civilian casualty incidents of the Afghan War. They also raise the possibilit­y of a breakdown in intelligen­ce sharing and communicat­ion across the military chain of command.

Pentagon officials declined to comment.

The internatio­nal humanitari­an agency that ran the facility, Doctors without Borders, has condemned the bombing as a war crime. The organizati­on says the strike killed 12 hospital staff and 10 patients. It insists that no gunmen, weapons or ammunition were in the building. The U.S. and Afghan government­s have launched three separate investigat­ions. President Barack Obama has apologized, but Doctors without Borders is calling for an internatio­nal probe.

Doctors without Borders officials say the U.S. airplane made five separate strafing runs over an hour, directing heavy fire on the main hospital building, which contained the emergency room and intensive care unit. Surroundin­g buildings were not struck, they say.

 ?? DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS VIA ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Injured Doctors Without Borders staff members are seen near their hospital after it was hit by a U.S. airstrike on Oct. 3. The attack killed a number of staff and patients.
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS VIA ASSOCIATED PRESS Injured Doctors Without Borders staff members are seen near their hospital after it was hit by a U.S. airstrike on Oct. 3. The attack killed a number of staff and patients.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States