The Mercury News Weekend

Feinstein’s question that Republican­s should answer

- By E. J. Dionne Jr. E. J. Dionne is a Washington Post columnist.

WASHINGTON » “Will he tell the president ‘no’?”

This question was at the heart of Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s opening statement at Wednesday’s confirmati­on hearing for Christophe­r Wray, President Trump’s nominee as FBI director. Wray was there because the man who appointed him had fired James Comey for failing, as Feinstein put it, to “pledge his loyalty” to Trump and to soft-peddle inquiries involving Russian meddling in the 2016 campaign.

The test for Wray, Feinstein said, will be his “willingnes­s to stand up in the face of political pressure.”

There is good reason to feel uneasy about having anyone appointed by Trump lead the FBI at this moment. It is obvious to all except the willfully blind that we now have a president who observes none of the norms, rules or expectatio­ns of his office. We also know that this team will lie, and lie, and lie again whenever the matter of Russia’s exertions to elect Trump arises.

Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian lawyer connected to the Putin regime after he received an email from an intermedia­ry promising “sensitive informatio­n” about Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” His decision exploded the president’s claims that neither he nor his campaign had anything to do with Russia’s efforts to tilt our election his way.

The son’s response to the invitation, “I love it,” will become the iconic summation of the Trump apparat’s attitude toward the assistance the president received from Vladimir Putin’s regime.

Almost as instructiv­e were the number of outright lies the Trump camp concocted to try to disguise the real motivation behind the encounter, which also involved Trump’s then-campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Feinstein’s suggestion that telling this president “no” has become the true measure of patriotism applies far beyond Wray. So far, Republican politician­s, with a precious few exceptions, are failing this ethics exam.

The revelation­s about Trump Jr. might have been the moment when Republican leaders at least started to grab their luggage in preparatio­n for disembarki­ng from the Trump train. After all, as Washington Post blogger Greg Sargent underscore­d, there is evidence that the president himself cooperated in putting out the original lies about his son’s meeting.

Yet the GOP is having trouble kicking its Trump habit.

While some Republican senators see the administra­tion’s dysfunctio­n as a barrier to their Obamacare repeal efforts, others are hoping the Trump Jr. distractio­n will lower the level of scrutiny of their next draft of a health care bill.

Vice President Pence’s effort to stay loyal to Trump while tip-toeing away from the latest disclosure­s is another sign of chaos. Marc Lotter, Pence’s press secretary, attempted to draw a bright line, saying of the vice president: “He is not focused on stories about the campaign, particular­ly stories about the time before he joined the ticket.”

But there is no bright line. This statement should widen, rather than narrow, interest in Pence’s behavior because denying any relationsh­ip with Russia was central to the campaign that he was part of.

Pence cannot be allowed to slink away. If he’s starting to see reasons for breaking with Trump, he’ll have to do it outright and end his own collusion with one of the most disingenuo­us White Houses in our history.

The same applies to Republican leaders in Congress. When will they tell the president “no”? Feinstein’s question is the right one for Wray. It should haunt Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, too.

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States