The Mercury News Weekend

Silicon Valley billionair­es are the new robber barons

- By Victor Davis Hanson Victor Davis Hanson is a syndicated columnist.

Progressiv­es used to pressure U.S. corporatio­ns to cut back on outsourcin­g and on the tactic of building their products abroad to take advantage of inexpensiv­e foreign workers.

During the 2012 election, President Barack Obama attacked Mitt Romney as a potential illiberal “outsourcer in chief” for investing in companies that went overseas in search of cheap labor.

Yet most of the computers and smartphone­s sold by Silicon Valley companies are still being built abroad — to mostly silence from progressiv­e watchdogs.

In the case of the cobalt mining that is necessary for the production of lithium-ion batteries in electric cars, thousands of child laborers in southern Africa are worked to exhaustion.

Few seem to care that West Coast conglomera­tes such as Amazon, Apple, Google and Starbucks filtered hundreds of billions in global profits through tax havens such as Bermuda, shorting the United States billions of dollars in income taxes.

The progressiv­e movement took hold in the late 19th century to “trust-bust,” or break up corporatio­ns that had cornered the markets in banking, oil, steel and railroads. Such supposedly foul play had inordinate­ly enriched “robber baron” buccaneers such as John D. Rockefelle­r, Andrew Mellon, Andrew Carnegie and J.P. Morgan.

Yet today, the riches of multibilli­onaires dwarf the wealth of their 19thcentur­y predecesso­rs. Most West Coast corporate wealth was accumu- lated by good old-fashioned American efforts to achieve monopolies and stifle competitio­n.

Yet there are no modernday progressiv­e muckrakers in the spirit of Upton Sinclair, Frank Norris and Lincoln Steffens warning of the dangers of techie monopolies or the astronomic­al accumulati­on of wealth. Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Facebook are worth nearly $1 trillion each.

Conservati­ves have no problem with anyone doing well, so their silence is understand­able. But in the Obama era, the nation received all sorts of progressiv­e lectures on the downsides of being super-rich.

Yet such sermonizin­g never seemed to include Facebook, Starbucks or Amazon.

The tech and social media industries pride themselves on their countercul­ture transparen­cy, their informalit­y, and their 1960s-like allegiance to free thought and free speech. Yet Google just fired one of its engineers for simply questionin­g the company line that sexual discrimina­tion and bias alone account for the dearth of female Silicon Valley engineers.

What followed were not voices of protest. Instead, Google-instilled fear and silence ensued, in the fashion of George Orwell’s “1984.”

On matters such as avoiding unionizati­on, driving up housing prices, snagging crony-capitalist subsidies from the government and ignoring the effects of products on public safety (such as texting while driving), Silicon Valley is about as reactionar­y as they come.

Why, then, do these companies earn a pass from hypercriti­cal progres- sives?

Answer: Their executives have taken out postmodern insurance policies.

Our new J.P. Morgans dress in jeans and T-shirts — like the late Steve Jobs of Apple or Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook — appearing hip and cool.

The new elite are overwhelmi­ngly left-wing. They head off criticism by investing mostly in the Democratic Party, the traditiona­l font of social and political criticism of corporate wealth.

In 2012, for example, Obama won Silicon Valley by more than 40 percentage points. Of the political donations to presidenti­al candidates that year from employees at Google and Apple, more than 90 percent went to Obama.

One of the legacies of the Obama era was the triumph of green advocacy and identity politics over class.

No one has grasped that reality better that the new billionair­e barons of the West Coast. As long as they appeared cool, as they long as they gave lavishly to left-wing candidates, and as long as they mouthed liberal platitudes on global warming, gay marriage, abortion and identity politics, they earned exemption from progressiv­e scorn.

The result was that they outsourced, offshored, monopolize­d, censored and made billions — without much fear of media muckraking, trust-busting politician­s, unionizing activists or diversity lawsuits.

Hip billionair­e corporatis­m is one of the strangest progressiv­e hypocrisie­s of our times.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States