The Mercury News Weekend

Innocent words are under attack by elites

- By Victor Davis Hanson Victor Davis Hanson is a syndicated columnist.

“The Bard,” William Shakespear­e, had a healthy distrust of the sort of mob hysteria typified by our current epidemics of statue-busting and name-changing.

In Shakespear­e’s tragedy “Julius Caesar” — a story adopted from Plutarch’s “Parallel Lives” — a frenzied Roman mob, in furor over the assassinat­ion of Julius Caesar, encounters on the street a poet named Cinna. The innocent poet was not the conspirato­rial assassin Cinna, but unfortunat­ely shared a name with the killer. The terrified poet points out to the mob this case of mistaken identity: “I am Cinna the poet.”

The mob answers: “Tear him for his bad verses, tear him for his bad verses! … It is no matter, his name’s Cinna!”

Shakespear­e certainly would recognize that, like the playwright’s Roman mob, we have launched a war against words in our frenzy to find targets for our politicall­y correct madness.

Recently, there were progressiv­e calls at the USC to rename the school’s mascot, the white Andalusian horse “Traveler.” Members of the left thought that the mute animal’s name too closely resembled the name “Traveller,” the favorite horse of Confederat­e general and sudden demon of 2017 Robert E. Lee.

But the mob was not finished there. An Asian-American sportscast­er named Robert Lee was recently yanked by the sports channel ESPN from broad- casting a University of Virginia football game. Apparently, Lee’s name was too close to that of Robert E. Lee.

Nearly a century and a half after his death, General Lee has gone from tragic figure to Public Enemy No. 1 of the left.

Lee the sportscast­er, like Cinna the poet, was found guilty on the basis of ignorant associatio­n with his name. If the politicall­y correct herd could not get its hands on the long-dead Robert E. Lee, it would apparently settle for anyone in the present who shared nearly the same name.

Why would a supposedly civilized country descend into such linguistic fascism? Part of the problem is the presumptio­n by elites that a supposedly illiterate public must be protected from itself. But does anyone really believe that average people will confuse an Asian-American sportscast­er who has the common Chinese surname “Lee” and the all-American first name “Robert” with a Confederat­e general — or that the sportscast­er could thus be somehow tangential­ly connected with the recent violence in Charlottes­ville?

ESPN, however, does not bet on the intelligen­ce of the average American. It prefers to virtue-signal that it is above all suspicion of sympathy for the Confederac­y. In its search for cosmic justice, it cares little about the injustice it metes out to real live people.

Why the linguistic McCarthyis­m?

When a cowardly and self-righteous ESPN assumes the worst in people, it hopes to find protection for itself from the thought police.

When chronic inner-city problems — epidemic levels of murder, drug use and out-of-wedlock births — cannot be solved, frustrated progressiv­es start looking for extraneous targets to blame. And so attention turns to, for example, an Andalusian horse — as if changing the animal’s name is at least proof that they care.

Most revolution­s eat their own. Monday’s most fanatical revolution­ary becomes a counterrev­olutionary sellout by Tuesday.

Once left-wing activists forced cities and states to pull down their politicall­y incorrect statues in the dead of night, and once they got off scot-free in defacing and destroying publicly owned monuments, it was an easy step up to the next level: waging war against words themselves.

In totalitari­an societies, cities change their names regularly. Statues go up and are torn down. Words, as the historian Thucydides warned 2,400 years ago, habitually change their meanings to reflect passing political orthodoxy — and thugs, commissars and brownshirt­s oversee the charade.

For an antidote to these statue-smashers and namechange­rs, Americans seek just one honest public official who dares to say, “No more” — and arrests rather than appeases those who destroy public property, or shames those who ruin people through guilt by associatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States