Trump speaks loudly on China tariffs — $60B
Dow Jones plunges more than 700 points, or almost 3 percent
WASHINGTON » President Donald Trump embarked Thursday on the sharpest trade confrontation with China in nearly a quarter- century, moving toward imposing tariffs on $60 billion in Chinese goods and limiting China’s freedom to invest in the U.S. technology industry.
Trump’s actions — which sent stocks to their biggest one- day drop in six weeks — followed a government finding that China had treated U.S. companies unfairly by coercing theminto surrendering trade secrets for market access.
“We’re doing things for this country that should have been done for many, many years,” the president said at the White House.
Trump directed U. S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to propose within 15 days tariff increases designed to compensate the United States for lost profits and jobs. After a comment period, the list, targeting Chinese products that benefited from U.S. technology, will bemade public.
But even as he confronted China over technology, Trump weakened a new tariffmeant to protect U.S. production of industrial metals, potentially exempting the European Union, Brazil and other countries accounting for two-thirds of steel
imports and more than half of foreign-made aluminum.
By challenging China, Trump rejected the approach of his Republican and Democratic predecessors, gambling that China will bend before he does. “We don’t know how this is going to turn out,” said Scott Kennedy, director of the project on Chinese business at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “It could be resolved in a few months, or it could spiral out of control into a broader strategic rivalry.
Early reviews were not good. On Wall Street, the benchmark Dow Jones industrial average plunged more than 700 points, or almost 3 percent, as investors blanched at the prospect of a trade war between the world’s two largest economies.
“There’s a lot of concern about this administration’s shoot-first approach,” said Josh Bolten, president of the Business Roundtable. “… The victims of the actions that the administration is proposing to take are principally Americans.”
Trump is betting that disrupting the traditional U. S. approach to China will yield a better commercial bargain for American businesses and workers than the status quo that he blames for hollowing out American industry.
Among U. S. politicians and business leaders, there is broad agreement that China has violated U.S. intellectual property rights through restrictive licensing arrangements in China and outright cybertheft in the United States.
But Thursday’s actions threatens to unravel global supply chains, increase costs for consumers and open the door to Chinese retaliation against U.S. farmers and businesses.
“The biggest and most powerful American companies are stuck in the middle,” said James McGregor, APCO Worldwide’s chairman for greater China. “They’re schizophrenic now. They don’t want today’s business to be eliminated. But they know China’s plan for tomorrow is to eliminate them in the Chinese market and then take them on globally.”
At $60 billion in affected products, Trump’s China actions carry a big-
“There is noway to impose $50 billion in tariffs on Chinese imports without it having a negative impact on American consumers.”
— Hun Quach, vice president for international trade at the Retail Industry Leaders Association
ger punch than the tariffs on $46 billion in steel and aluminum imports that he announced March 8.
The impact of those earlier levies may shrink further: Lighthizer told the Senate Finance Committee on Thursday that products from the European Union, Australia, Argentina, South Korea and Brazil will not be affected when the tariffs go into effect on Friday while negotiations over potential exemptions continue.
Trump already had exempted Canada and Mexico from the import levies for the duration of talks aimed at renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Still, the likely China tariffs pose little immediate threat to the growing economy because they will touch just 3 percent of total goods imports, according to Andrew Hunter, U.S. economist for Capital Economics.
The big worry is how China responds and whether the countries stumble into a tit-for-tat slugfest. In Washington, the Chinese Embassy distributed a statement from Ambassador Cui Tiankai rejecting Trump’s claims of intellectual property violations and warning that his approach would hurt “American middle- class people,” U.S. companies and the stock market.
“We don’t want a trade war. But we are not afraid of it,” Cui said. “If somebody tries to impose a trade war on us, we will certainly fight back and retaliate. If people want to play tough, we will play tough with them and see who will last longer.”
The United States last adopted this sort of uncompromising approach in a 1995 dispute over intellectual property rights. China ultimately acceded to U. S. demands, but today its economy is almost 17 times as big, making it less vulnerable to American pressure.
A Sino- U. S. trade war would affect economies that account for roughly 40 percent of global output, which explains the mounting apprehension on Wall Street.
“Trump’s economics team blew it,” economist Chris Rupkey of MUFG Union Bank wrote in a research note. “…Tariffs mean a trade war and the news has the world’s investors running for the exits.”
The president blamed China for the loss of 60,000 factories and 6million jobs, a number that most economists say blends the impact on U.S. employment of both Chinese competition and automation.
Trump said that unfair Chinese trade practices are responsible for the yawning U. S. trade deficit with China, which has reached a record $375 billion on his watch.
“Any way you look at it, it’s the largest of any country in the history of our world,” the president said. “It’s out of control.”
The White House expects the new taxes, which could reach up to 1,300 specific imports, will have a “minimal impact” upon consumers. But even business groups that support the goal of requiring changes in Chinese industrial policy voiced opposition to the tariffs.
“There is no way to impose $50 billion in tariffs on Chinese imports without it having a negative impact on American consumers. Make no mistake, these tariffs may be aimed at China, but the bill will be charged to American consumers who will pay more at the checkout for the items they shop for every day,” said Hun Quach, vice president for international trade at the Retail Industry Leaders Association.
Trump also ordered Lighthizer to complain to the World Trade Organization about China’s discriminatory licensing practices for foreign companies, an effort that U.S. officials hope will draw support from American allies in Europe and Japan.
The president described the actions against China as part of a broader reappraisal of U. S. global relationships, featuring a willingness to use tariff threats to force concessions from trading partners.
“We will end up negotiating these things rather than fighting over them,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said, in an apparent reference to fears of a trade war.