The Mercury News Weekend

Deadly blazes are prompting calls for changing how California prepares for and responds to wildfires.

Deadly blazes are prompting calls for a major change in wildfire response

- By AngelaHart and Taryn Luna Sacramento Bee

At least six people dead. More than 1,000 homes leveled and another 17,000 under threat. Nearly 13,000 firefighte­rs, from as far away as Florida and Maine to Australia and New Zealand, battling ferocious wildfires burning across California. California firefighte­rs and emergency responders are being pummeled by increasing­ly extreme and unpredicta­ble wildfires, as the state’s climate becomes hotter and the land grows drier.

“The need to protect these communitie­s…is requiring more firefighte­rs, more resources all the time,” said Cal Fire Direc- tor Ken Pimlott, in an interview. “Fire is a way of life in California. It’s not going away, so we have to learn to live with it.”

The deadly blazes, in Sonoma County in 2017 and in Shasta County this summer, are prompting urgent calls for a major change of course in how California prepares for and responds to wildfires. State lawmakers, fire officials and both candidates for governor say if the state doesn’t act, conditions will worsen in years to come.

More people will die, more homes will be lost and large swaths of pristine forestland will be wiped out, they fear.

“We’re in for a really rough ride,” Gov. Jerry Brown said at a news conference Wednesday in Sacramento. “It’s going to get expensive, it’s going to get dangerous, and we have to apply all our creativity to make the best of what is going to be an increasing­ly bad situation.” Officials are beginning to undertake a broad, more ambitious prevention strategy that includes aggressive­ly thinning out thick forests in rural, rugged parts of the state, increasing state funding for firefighte­rs, training and equipment, incorporat­ing into firefighte­r training new methods for battling unpredicta­ble, wind- driven fires and working with local government­s to update land use plans and building codes that discourage developmen­t in fire-prone areas or call for more safety measures.

“The risks are much bigger than what we may have traditiona­lly thought of,” Pimlott said. “These are literally 100, 150-foot flame lengths…there’s no way we’re going to stop that kind of a fire, so we are changing tactics.” Pimlott said the key priority is protecting life and property.

“We have a limited number of resources,” Pimlott said. “You always want more… California, even now, has become very good at organizing limited resources and identifyin­g priorities.”

Since the fiscal year began July 1, Cal Fire has already spent $115 million of the $ 443 million allocated in this year’s budget for fighting wildfires, and the state is on track exceed the current budget if wildfires intensify. The worst fires tend to occur in late fall and early winter. During last year’s fires, the state spent $773 million, far more than the $ 427 million initially approved.

Brown said Wednesday that the state will spend what it must to attack the fires. “There is money in this year’s budget,” he said. “In a year or slightly longer, that money will start to diminish… Things will get much tighter in the next five years as the business cycle turns negative and the fires continue.”

He suggested California has been caught off-guard by the current demands. “No one expected a fire tornado,” Brown said. “We’re getting a new phenomenon and that new phenomenon is we’re in a new climate weather era and so we have to learn.”

Brown since 2015 has directed more than $800 million in one-time budget funds for fire prevention, including the removal of dead trees and other veg- etation that fuel fires. In May he outlined in an executive order a $96 million plan to expand vegetation thinning, controlled fires and reforestat­ion on up to 500,000 acres of land.

He also spent $160 million in cap-and-trade revenue to support forest improvemen­ts and fire protection. The plan also seeks tomake it easier for private landowners to thin vegetation on their properties by streamlini­ng the approvals process for permits needed to do so. Some say the state’s efforts to date don’t go far enough. Republican gubernator­ial candidate John Cox blasted state lawmakers for not adequately funding fire prevention.

He downplayed concerns voiced by his Democratic opponent, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, and Brown, about climate change and the increasing threat of disastrous wildfires.

Cox, who toured the fire zone in Shasta County this week with Republican lawmakers, said “I don’t know,” if climate change is human- caused. “Politician­s like Mr. Brown and Mr. Newsom are distractin­g people,” Cox said. “What’s really going on here is they’re blaming this on climate change to cover up for the fact that they haven’t devoted the time and the resources and the planning to actually doing something about forestry management.” Cox also backs the thinning of forests, saying the state should be investing in “fire breaks, controlled burns, and clearing out dead and diseased trees.”

Newsom outlined a detailed approach for how he’d address the looming wildfire threat to California. He said the state must improve vegetation management, boost funding for fire prevention and containmen­t, bolster resources for fire department­s across the state, invest in weather monitoring technology and a statewide early warning system and more aggressive­ly lower greenhouse gas emissions to put the state on a path to 100 percent renewable energy.

“The science is clear — increased fire threat due to climate change is becoming a fact of life in our state,” Newsom said in a statement. “We need a comprehens­ive strategy and more resources to address this growing crisis.”

Assembly Minority Leader Brian Dahle, a Republican from Lassen County, and Assemblyma­n Jim Wood, a Democrat from Sonoma County, are pushing, as part of the state’s broader efforts, legislatio­n easing regulation­s and allowing greater thinning of trees, grasses and other vegetation from thick forests that allow wildfires to spread so quickly.

“By not doing that, we’re burning down our forests,” Dahle said. “We know if we don’t do anything, it’s going to burn.” Wood said it needs to be done on a “large scale,” with ongoing state money.

 ?? MARK RALSTON — GETTY IMAGES ?? Firefighte­rs conduct a controlled burn to defend houses against flames from the Ranch Fire as it spreads toward Upper Lake.
MARK RALSTON — GETTY IMAGES Firefighte­rs conduct a controlled burn to defend houses against flames from the Ranch Fire as it spreads toward Upper Lake.
 ?? JUSTIN SULLIVAN — GETTY IMAGES ?? A firefighti­ng aircraft drops fire retardant ahead of the River Fire as it burns through a canyon on Wednesday in Lakeport.
JUSTIN SULLIVAN — GETTY IMAGES A firefighti­ng aircraft drops fire retardant ahead of the River Fire as it burns through a canyon on Wednesday in Lakeport.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States