The Mercury News Weekend

Study: Berkeley, Oakland worst U.S. markets for first-time buyers

- By Leonardo Castañeda lcastaneda@bayareanew­sgroup.com

If you’re thinking about finding a starter home in Berkeley, think again.

The East Bay city is the worst in the nation for first-time homebuyers, according to an analysis by personal finance website WalletHub of affordabil­ity, the state of the real estate market and quality of life.

Berkeley was the worst among the 300 U. S. cities analyzed, but it wasn’t the only Bay Area city on the list. Among large cities, Oakland is the second worst, followed by San Francisco in fourth place and San Jose in 12th place. Among medium-sized cities — those between 150,000 and 300,000 residents — Sunnyvale was the fifth worst.

But among small cities with fewer than 150,000 residents, Berkeley was No. 1, followed by San Mateo in third and Daly City in sixth.

The region’s exorbitant home prices played a big factor in why Bay Area cities are so concentrat­ed at the bottom of the rankings for first-time buyers. But price is far from the only reason.

“Other factors contributi­ng to the poor rankings include a high average rent-to-price ratio, a low share of homes sold in one year, long buy vs rent break-even horizons, very few listings with price cuts, and a low home ownership rate for Millennial­s,” WalletHub analyst Jill Gonzalez said in an email.

Berkeley’s worst-in-the-nation showing doesn’t surprise realtor Deidre Joyner with Red Oak Realty, who was born in Berkeley and raised in Oakland.

“I see a lot of people who I grew up with who can’t afford to own in the cities where they’re from,” Joyner said. “I think there is a gulf between the haves and have-nots.”

Berkeley has many of the qualities young families are looking for, she said: good public schools, access to transit, quality grocery stores in walking distance.

“There’s a lot more demand, but not a lot of turnover,” she said.

People are staying in their homes longer, so there aren’t many options available in the market. That’s in part because people who have outgrown their first homes can’t afford to upgrade to a bigger space, so they end up remodeling or expanding their property. That keeps potential starter houses off the market.

Even when something does open up, Joyner said it’s often an older home with years of deferred maintenanc­e. She said she often advises first-time buyers to expect $30,000 to $40,000 in renovation­s right out of the gate. So if not Berkeley, where? Joyner said she’s recently sold some homes in San Leandro, where homeowners can find some of the same amenities — a BART station, farmers market, even public art — that they want in Oakland or Berkeley but at a lower price.

The Alameda County city, which wasn’t included in WalletHub’s rankings, has a median home value of about $600,000, around $180,000 lower than the county’s median.

Nationally, Tampa, Florida, is the best city for buying a starter home. And if you want to stay local, Concord was the highest-ranked city in the Bay Area — in 213th place.

Oakland can still be an option for first-time buyers if they’re willing to look outside the most popular areas.

“There’s 150- some sub-neighborho­ods in Oakland,” Joyner said. “Casting a wider net to see what your options are is a great way to go about your search.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States