The Mercury News Weekend

Will we ever stop changing the clock?

Some voters want to adopt year-round daylight saving time — and sooner rather than later

- ASSEMBLY BILL 7 By Andrew Sheeler Sacramento Bee

In less than two weeks, daylight saving time again will come to an end, prompting California­ns to again set their clocks back an hour.

That “fall back” comes despite the fact that voters last year strongly supported Propositio­n 7, which empowered the Legislatur­e to vote to adopt year-round daylight saving time with congressio­nal approval.

Assemblyma­n Kansen Chu, D

San Jose, has introduced a bill, Assembly Bill 7, that would make that change. The bill has been delayed until the second half of the legislativ­e session begins in 2020.

Chu sponsored a similar bill in 2016 that failed in a Senate floor vote.

One issue that has proved to be a sticking point is how to establish year-round daylight saving time rather than year-round permanent standard time. Federal law prohibits the former but allows the latter.

Chu has said he will ask his constituen­ts for their thoughts on which time they’d prefer to switch to, and that he will amend his bill accordingl­y in the new year.

“It is important to me that my constituen­ts are heard, and putting a pause on moving the bill will give me the opportunit­y to do more outreach,” Chu said in a statement.

There were other complicati­ons.

A Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communicat­ions analysis of AB7 found that changing California to permanent daylight saving time could cause “considerab­le disruption” not just to the routines of state

residents but also to California’s three bordering states and Mexico.

“The constant movement of people and goods across those borders requires coordinati­on. The economies and societies of the border communitie­s are interdepen­dent,” the analysis said.

The committee analysis found that the state could take its time and assess the implicatio­ns and impacts of a change to permanent daylight saving time.

“The question for the Legislatur­e is whether immediate action is necessary. It seems there may be some benefit to waiting and assessing implicatio­ns of a yearlong DST before authorizin­g its change,” the analysis said.

In the meantime, daylight saving time, which began this year at 2 a.m. March 10, will end at 2 a.m. Nov. 3.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States