The Mercury News Weekend

New California drought ‘pretty likely’ by summer

Fire danger likely to be high this year without more rain

- By Paul Rogers progers@bayareanew­sgroup.com

Following another week without rain — and none forecast through the end of this month across Northern California — the federal government on Thursday announced that unusually dry conditions are expanding across a wider swath of California’s landscape, increasing concerns about summer fire risk and the possible return of at least a modest drought this year.

Overall, 59.9% of the state’s land area is now classified as “abnormally dry,” up from 46.1% last week, according to the U. S. Drought Monitor, a weekly report issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion, the U. S. Department of Agricultur­e and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

All nine Bay Area counties are now classified as abnormally dry. So are places that have suffered devastatin­g fires in recent years: Sonoma, Napa, Lake and Mendocino counties. Without significan­t rain in March or April, fire danger in those areas and other parts of the state will be higher than normal again this summer.

“Given what we’ve seen so far this year and the forecast for the next few weeks, I do think it’s pretty likely we’ll end up in some degree of drought by this summer,” said Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at UCLA, on Thursday.

Swain noted, however, that the state is equipped to handle one-year droughts pretty well without major water shortages because of water stored in reservoirs, groundwate­r wells and conservati­on.

It’s when dry conditions persist for several years, as they did during the state’s historic drought from 2012 to 2017, that problems arise.

“Assuming this year ends dry, which is pretty likely,” Swain said, “the question is what happens next year?”

Of note in Thursday’s federal report: The area of California where abnormally dry conditions are now present is 14

million acres larger than it was last week, a landscape 44 times the size of Los Angeles.

“The plants and the forests don’t benefit from the water storage reservoirs,” Swain said. “If conditions remain very dry heading into summer, the landscape and vegetation is definitely going to feel it this year. From a wildfire perspectiv­e, the dry years do tend to be the bad fire years, especially in Northern California.”

Last year, following a wet February and March, the state experience­d a mild fire year, with high moisture levels in grasses, shrubs and trees — a welcome departure from prior years when major fires devastated Napa and Sonoma County, along with the town of Paradise in Butte County.

Altogether, Thursday’s report noted, 58% of California’s population, or 21.7 million people, are currently living in areas that are in moderate drought or are abnormally dry.

The amount of the state in “moderate drought,” a more serious category, remained the same this week as last week, at 9.5%. But that’s expected to increase if the National Weather Service’s dry forecast for the next two weeks bears out.

The reason for the dry conditions is a persistent weather pattern that is sending California’s rain toward Seattle.

“High pressure off the California coast kept much of California, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah precipitat­ion-free this week, with above-normal temperatur­es in California,” wrote David Miskus, a NOAA meteorolog­ist and author of Thursday’s drought report.

“Instead, Pacific storm systems were deflected northward or southward, allowing the Pacific Northwest to receive welcome moisture.”

The area in moderate drought Thursday, the driest in California, was in the Central Valley, covering roughly 10million acres from Tuolumne County to Kern County.

The new report does not mean, however, that California is heading back into the kind of severe drought that the state experience­d from 2012 to 2017.

There is still another month in the state’s rainy season. And California has had very wet “Miracle March” conditions in years past.

By comparison, five years ago, on the week of Feb. 17, 2015, an overwhelmi­ng 98% of the state was in at least a moderate drought, and 41% was in exceptiona­l drought, the most severe of the five categories used in the report.

That drought was broken by a series of massive atmospheri­c river storms — or “Pineapple Express”— that roared in off the Pacific in early 2017. The storms caused flooding in downtown San Jose and the collapse of the spillway at Oroville Damin Butte County.

This winter season, although California experience­d some decent rainfall around Thanksgivi­ng and into December, the storms all but shut down after the New Year, and January and February have been unusually warm and dry.

Just one day in 2020 so far, Jan. 16, has had enough rain to bring at least 1 inch to San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose.

So far in February, not a drop of rain has fallen in San Francisco. If the month ends without any rain, it will be the first time since 1864 when February, usually one of the wettest months of the year, came up completely dry.

Lack of rain has meant lack of snow. On Wednesday, the statewide Sierra snowpack, the source of nearly one-third of California’s water, was at 52% of its historic average for that date, down from 92% on New Year’s Day.

The good news is that last year’s wet winter filled reservoirs, boosting the state’s water supply. On Thursday, Shasta Lake, the state’s largest reservoir, was 78% full — 109% of its historic average for mid-February.

Oroville was 64% full, or 93% of its historic average. And San Luis Reservoir near Los Banos was 73% full, or 88% of average for this time of year.

Water managers are watching the weather trend nervously.

Because of the reservoir storage, California usually needs at least two dry winters in a row before significan­t water conservati­on measures are imposed.

“I’m keeping my fingers crossed for some rain,” Swain said. “But there isn’t any on the horizon right now. At this point the odds of ending up at average for the whole winter are astronomic­ally low. A Miracle March wouldn’t dig us all the way out of the hole, but it could help.”

 ?? JANE TYSKA — STAFF PHOTOGRAPH­ER ?? Pierce Jackson, 11, of Vacaville, jumps off a log during an outing with his family Thursday at the beach at Crissy Field in San Francisco. The family had originally planned a ski trip to Lake Tahoe, but changed plans because of concerns about the snow conditions.
JANE TYSKA — STAFF PHOTOGRAPH­ER Pierce Jackson, 11, of Vacaville, jumps off a log during an outing with his family Thursday at the beach at Crissy Field in San Francisco. The family had originally planned a ski trip to Lake Tahoe, but changed plans because of concerns about the snow conditions.
 ?? COURTESY OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE ?? Satellite images released by the National Weather Service show the snowpack in the Sierra Nevada mountains in mid-February last year, left, and mid-February this year.
COURTESY OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Satellite images released by the National Weather Service show the snowpack in the Sierra Nevada mountains in mid-February last year, left, and mid-February this year.
 ?? KARL MONDON – STAFF PHOTOGRAPH­ER ?? Visitors at the Rotary Play Garden in San Jose spend time outdoors on Thursday, a warmwinter day.
KARL MONDON – STAFF PHOTOGRAPH­ER Visitors at the Rotary Play Garden in San Jose spend time outdoors on Thursday, a warmwinter day.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States