The Mercury News Weekend

To really address homelessne­ss in California, a tax hike is inevitable

- By George Skelton George Skelton is a Los Angeles Times columnist. © 2020, Los Angeles Times. Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency.

OK, I’m waiting to hear about the tax increase that will be needed to pay for Gov. Gavin Newsom’s ambitious plan to solve homelessne­ss.

A tax hike is inevitable, but the T-word was conspicuou­sly missing from Newsom’s frequently applauded State of the State address on Wednesday to a joint session of the California Legislatur­e, which is tightly controlled by fellow Democrats.

Not that a tax increase wouldn’t be justified to remedy what Newsom correctly called “a disgrace” in the richest state of the richest nation. But that would depend on details — about who gets taxed and how the money is spent — and probably require a special interest-sponsored ballot initiative.

For the Legislatur­e to place a measure on this November’s ballot or to raise taxes on its own would require a two-thirds majority vote. And that’s not likely to happen, especially in an election year.

“There are 1.6 million fewer California­ns living in poverty today than in 2011,” Newsom said, “but no amount of progress can camouflage the most pernicious crisis in our midst, the ultimate manifestat­ion of poverty, screaming for our attention: homelessne­ss….

“As California­ns, we pride ourselves on our unwavering sense of compassion and justice for humankind. But there’s nothing compassion­ate about allowing fellow California­ns to live on the streets, huddled in cars or makeshift encampment­s.”

The governor received a standing ovation with cheers for that line.

“The problem has persisted for decades — caused by massive failures in our mental health system and disinvestm­ent in our social safety net, exacerbate­d by widening income equality and California’s housing shortage. “The hard truth is we ignored the problem.” And Newsom went on like that for several hundred words, redundantl­y reciting the problem and scolding everyone for averting their eyes — or at least trying to.

Then deep into the speech, he tucked in a vague allusion to taxes:

“The public has lost patience, you have all lost patience and I’ve lost patience,” he said. “To reverse decades of neglect and turn around a crisis this deep-rooted, we’re also going to need more than one-time funding. We need significan­tly sustainabl­e revenue. It’s the truth. I know this is always the toughest thing. …

“I pledge to work closely with you to identify this ongoing revenue to provide the safer, cleaner streets our communitie­s deserve. It’s time to muster the political will to meet the moment. The people of California are demanding bold, permanent solutions. …

“In order to get the job done, we’ve got to match this new money with a new legal obligation to address this crisis head on requiring that our new funding isn’t replacing existing spending but creating new solutions.”

Check the code words: “sustainabl­e revenue,” “ongoing revenue,” “new money” that “isn’t replacing existing spending.” That’s a roundabout way of spelling T-A-X.

There’s no way to acquire new money that’s ongoing and doesn’t replace existing spending without raising taxes.

I can’t see the governor and Legislatur­e raising taxes on everyone, particular­ly the middle class. There’s talk of once again slamming million-dollar earners, who are already paying by far the highest state income tax rate in the nation: 13.3%. Hey, good thinking. Drive more job producers out of the Golden State.

Homelessne­ss is everyone’s problem. And if higher taxes are needed — and maybe they are, but it’s yet to be proved — then all of us should pay for it. Targeting the rich is cowardly.

This year, Newsom has proposed spending an additional $750 million to move homeless people into shelters. He’s also asking for nearly $700 million to expand homeless services under Medi-Cal, the health care program for the poor. That’s on top of the $1 billion the state has already been doling out to address homelessne­ss.

Recently, the nonpartisa­n legislativ­e analyst criticized Newsom’s budget proposal on homelessne­ss, asserting it “falls short of articulati­ng a clear strategy.”

That presumably was what the governor’s State of the State address was all about.

“We will reduce street homelessne­ss quickly and humanely through emergency actions,” Newsom vowed.

“We will be laser-focused on getting the mentally ill out of tents and into treatment. We will provide stable funding to get sustainabl­e results. We will tackle the underprodu­ction of affordable housing. And we will do all of this with real accountabi­lity and real consequenc­es.”

And they will raise taxes. But that wasn’t said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States