The Mercury News Weekend

New legislatio­n would block $1.68 billion PG&E tax deduction for wildfire payments

Lawmaker wants to prohibit breaks for utility’s settlement­s

- By George Avalos gavalos@ bayareanew­sgroup.com

Like millions of U. S. taxpayers, PG&E anticipate­s tax deductions for certain events — but a state senator wants to bar tax breaks for wildfireli­nked settlement­s conducted by the embattled utility.

“It’s obscene for PG&E to contemplat­e a billion-dollarplus tax break on the financial obligation­s the company agreed to shoulder as its penalty for the deadly wildfires its equipment caused,” state Sen. Jerry Hill said on Thursday.

In a disclosure that was tucked away in a 33-page filing with the state Public Utilities Commission, PG&E revealed that it would likely be eligible for a tax deduction of roughly $1.6 billion, according to official filings.

“PG&E estimates that the $1.625 billion for certain specified wildfire-related expenditur­es is likely to be deductible for tax purposes because PG&E has incurred, or will incur, these costs in accordance with its legal obligation,” PG&E stated in documents related to a settlement agreement with the state PUC’s Safety and Enforcemen­t Division.

Plus, an additional $50 million PG& E payment related to system enhancemen­t initiative­s also could be eligible for tax deductions. That could be a total of nearly $1.7 billion in tax deductions.

“For California state tax purposes, PG& E’s current best estimate is that the full $1.675 billion in financial obligation­s will be deductible,” the utility stated in the documents filed with the PUC.

These revelation­s dismayed Hill, whose district in parts of Santa Clara County and San Mateo County in

cludes San Bruno, the site of a fatal gas explosion caused by PG&E that killed eight people in 2010.

The state senator introduced SB 1139, which aims to prevent a power company such as PG&E to harvest the tax savings.

San Francisco- based PG& E’s equipment has been linked to or been the direct cause of a string of fatal disasters that stretch back a full decade. Both the electricit­y and the gas systems that the company operates have been involved in these catastroph­es.

Among the PG&E-linked calamities besides the San Bruno explosion: a fatal wildfire in Amador County and Calaveras County in 2015, a series of deadly infernos that scorched the North Bay Wine Country and nearby regions in 2017, and a lethal blaze that roared through Butte County and destroyed the town of Paradise in 2018.

PG& E’s wildfire-linked liabilitie­s and other debts eventually towered so high that the company’s finances buckled and the utility staggered into a $51.69 billion bankruptcy in January 2019

By the end of June, PG&E hopes to exit its bankruptcy proceeding on a firm financial footing. It’s unclear how smooth the path is for that anticipate­d outcome.

Amid all of this financial, legal, and regulatory turmoil, Hill hopes that he can convince state lawmakers to enact and Gov. Gavin Newsom to approve his bill to ensure PG&E can’t take the wildfire tax deductions.

“We should not allow PG&E, or any other electric or gas company, to claim a tax savings windfall for failing to make their systems safe,” Hill said.

 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I — ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES ?? “For California state tax purposes, PG&E’s current best estimate is that the full $1.675 billion in financial obligation­s will be deductible,” according to documents filed with the PUC.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I — ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES “For California state tax purposes, PG&E’s current best estimate is that the full $1.675 billion in financial obligation­s will be deductible,” according to documents filed with the PUC.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States