The Mercury News Weekend

Trump rejects Dems’ request for testimony

Ex-president’s lawyers denounce letter as ‘public relations stunt’

- By Eric Tucker, Mary Clare Jalonick and Jill Colvin The Associated Press

WASHINGTON >> House Democrats on Thursday asked Donald Trump to testify under oath for his Senate impeachmen­t trial, challengin­g him to respond to their charge that he incited a violent mob to storm the Capitol. A Trump adviser said the former president won’t testify.

Although Democrats might not have the power to force Trump’s testimony, the request from House impeachmen­t managers is part of their overall effort to put the violent events of Jan. 6 on the record for history and hold him accountabl­e for his words. Democrats will be able to use his refusal to testify against him as they argue that the ex-president has avoided responsibi­lity for his actions.

Hours after the Democrats’ request was revealed, Trump adviser Jason Miller dismissed the trial as “an unconstitu­tional proceeding” and said the former president would not testify. Separately,

Trump’s lawyers denounced the request as a “public relations stunt.”

The impeachmen­t trial starts Tuesday.

Democrats have said a trial is necessary to provide a final measure of accountabi­lity for the attack. If Trump is convicted, the Senate could hold a second vote to disqualify him from seeking office again.

In the letter to the former president and his attorneys, Democratic Rep.

Jamie Raskin, one of the impeachmen­t managers, asked that Trump explain why he and his team have disputed key factual allegation­s at the center of their charge. He asked that Trump provide testimony about his conduct “either before or during the Senate impeachmen­t trial,” and under cross-examinatio­n, as early as Monday and not later than Feb. 11.

The request from Raskin cites the words of Trump’s attorneys, who in a legal brief earlier this week not only denied that Trump had incited the riot, but also asserted that he had “performed admirably in his role as president, at all times doing what he thought was in the best interests of the American people.”

With that argument, Raskin said, Trump had questioned critical facts in the case “notwithsta­nding the clear and overwhelmi­ng evidence of your constituti­onal offense.”

Trump attorneys Bruce Castor and David Schoen responded hours later that the letter proves that Democrats “cannot prove your allegation­s” and that an impeachmen­t trial is too serious “to try to play these games.”

The lawyers, and many Senate Republican­s, have argued that the trial is unconstitu­tional because Trump is no longer in office, even though he was impeached while he was still president. In a test vote in the Senate last week, 45 Republican­s voted for an effort to dismiss the trial on those grounds.

Democrats say the Republican­s are arguing process because they can’t defend the former president’s actions, and they point to the many legal scholars who have said the trial is on firm constituti­onal ground.

Raskin said in the letter that if Trump refuses to appear, the managers will use his refusal against him in the trial — a similar argument put forth by House Democrats in last year’s impeachmen­t trial, when many Trump officials ignored subpoenas. Trump was eventually acquitted of two charges that he abused his presidenti­al powers by pressuring the Ukrainian government to investigat­e now-President Joe Biden.

The impeachmen­t managers do not have the authority to subpoena witnesses now since the House has already voted to impeach him. The Senate could vote to subpoena Trump, or any other witnesses, on a simple majority vote during the trial.

On Thursday, senators in both parties made it clear they would be reluctant to do so.

Shortly after Raskin’s letter was made public, Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., said it would be a “terrible idea” for Trump to testify. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, DConn., said Trump’s statements before and after the attack on the Capitol “are the most powerful evidence. His own words incriminat­e him. They show his guilty intent.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States