The Mercury News Weekend

Governor signs legislatio­n protecting IVF providers from any legal liability into law

- By Kim Chandler

MONTGOMERY, ALA. >> Facing pressure to get in vitro fertilizat­ion services restarted in the state, Alabama's governor swiftly signed legislatio­n into law Wednesday shielding doctors from potential legal liability raised by a court ruling that equated frozen embryos to children.

Republican Gov. Kay Ivey signed the bill after it was approved in a late-night session by lawmakers scrambling to address a wave of criticism after services were halted at some of the state's largest fertility clinics. Doctors from at least one clinic said they would resume IVF services on Thursday.

“I am pleased to sign this important, short-term measure into law so that couples in Alabama hoping and praying to be parents can grow their families through IVF,” Ivey said.

Republican­s in the lLegislatu­re opted to back the immunity proposal as a solution to the clinics' concerns. But they shied away from proposals that would address the legal status of embryos created in IVF labs, action that some said would be needed to permanentl­y settle the issue.

The Alabama Supreme Court last month ruled that three couples whose frozen embryos were destroyed in an accident at a storage facility could pursue wrongful death lawsuits for their “extrauteri­ne children.” The ruling, treating an embryo the same as a child or gestating fetus under the wrongful death statute, raised concerns about civil liabilitie­s for clinics. Three providers paused services.

The new law, which took effect immediatel­y, shields providers from prosecutio­n and civil lawsuits “for the damage to or death of an embryo” during IVF services. Civil lawsuits could be pursued against manufactur­ers of IVF-related goods, such as the nutrient-rich solutions used to grow embryos, but damages would be capped to “the price paid for the impacted in vitro cycle.”

Patients and doctors had traveled to Montgomery, to urge lawmakers to find a solution. They described appointmen­ts that were abruptly canceled and how their paths to parenthood were suddenly put in doubt.

Doctors from Alabama Fertility, one of the clinics that paused IVF services, watched as the bill got final passage. They said it will allow them to resume embryo transfers “starting tomorrow.”

“We have some transfers tomorrow and some Friday. This means that we will be able to do embryo transfers and hopefully have more pregnancie­s and babies in the state of Alabama,” Dr. Mamie McLean said after the vote.

The University of Alabama at Birmingham similarly said it is “moving to promptly resume IVF treatments.”

Republican Sen. Larry Stutts, an obstetrici­an who cast the lone no vote in the Senate Wednesday, said the bill is an “IVF provider and supplier protection bill” and does not protect patients.

“It is actually limiting the ability of mothers who are involved in IVF to have recourse and it is placing a dollar value on human life,” Stutts said.

 ?? BUTCH DILL — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Doctors from the Alabama Fertility Clinic take photos of the votes as the debate over SB159bill in the House Chambers is voted on Wednesday in Montgomery, Ala.
BUTCH DILL — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Doctors from the Alabama Fertility Clinic take photos of the votes as the debate over SB159bill in the House Chambers is voted on Wednesday in Montgomery, Ala.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States