The Mercury News

Take the time to learn more about Delta plan

- By Cathy R. Lazarus and Rita Norton Cathy R. Lazarus is president of the Los Altos- Mountain View League of Women Voters, and Rita Norton is Natural Resources Committee Chair of the San JoseSanta Clara League. They wrote this for this newspaper.

California is a thirsty state. The 20th- century water delivery infrastruc­ture is inadequate, deteriorat­ing and unreliable.

We now recognize that historical water delivery and management strategies have caused serious harm to the fragile Sacramento- San Joaquin Bay Delta ecosystem, the source of much of California’s water supply, including Santa Clara County’s.

Delta flood protection levees are failing, threatenin­g communitie­s and agricultur­al lands. Land is subsiding. Fragile habitat continues to disappear, endangerin­g native species such as the coho salmon. The threat of salt water intrusion into the fresh waters of the Delta is increasing.

Add population growth, drought and climate change to the mix and the problem seems overwhelmi­ng and insolvable.

A consortium of state and federal agencies recently released the draft Bay Delta Conservati­on Plan and companion environmen­tal documents for public review and comment. The 30,000- plus pages outline 22 complex conservati­on measures to “restore fish and wildlife species and to improve the reliabilit­y of water supplies, while minimizing impacts on Delta communitie­s and farmlands.”

So far there has been little public interest in the plan beyond a core group of stakeholde­rs. However, if you are a California­n who drinks water, eats food, values natural resources, enjoys recreation and pays taxes, you are also a stakeholde­r. That is why we believe it is important to shine a bright light on the BDCP and understand the implicatio­ns to Santa Clara County and the rest of California.

The wide- ranging proposals call for restoring approximat­ely 153,000 acres of habitat, replumbing the water delivery system by moving the main intake of Delta waters to minimize saltwater intrusion and rebuilding the water system’s infrastruc­ture to improve reliabilit­y.

Also included are the “twin tunnels” that have gotten the most attention in the media.

As far as we can tell, the BDCP does not increase the supply of water; rather it serves to stabilize the delivery of existing supplies. By any account it is a bold, comprehens­ive and expensive endeavor with an initial price tag of $ 25 billion ( in undiscount­ed 2012 dollars) and a 50- year implementa­tion horizon.

It is easy to dismiss the plan as yet another chapter in the long history of water wars that divide Northern and Southern California, environmen­talists and Delta farmers, urban areas and rural communitie­s.

While stakeholde­rs debate how to solve the Delta’s problems, virtually all agree the current conditions of the Delta and state water system are unsustaina­ble. The proposed plan is the most aggressive approach to address the problem in decades.

While it is a challenge to the layperson to know if the science and engineerin­g behind the BDCP are correct, as informed California­ns we need to know: Are there reasonable alternativ­es? How will the plan be financed? Who will oversee implementa­tion? Is there the political will to see it through?

And, are current allocation­s to water users mindful of long- term projection­s of water scarcity? Is it a valid assumption to stabilize the delivery of existing supplies to current users?

To help the public understand the Bay- Delta conundrum and provide various perspectiv­es on the plan, the Leagues of Women Voters of Santa Clara County are sponsoring a free, public forum March 1 from 1- 3: 30 p. m. at the Martin Luther King Library in downtown San Jose. Check this website — www. sclaraco. ca. lwvnet. org — for details, and take advantage of this opportunit­y to learn about a proposal that would affect every California­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States