The Mercury News

Ballot plan would limit transgende­r students

Bathroomus­e would be based on biological sex

- By Hailey Branson- Potts

A group that tried unsuccessf­ully to repeal California’s transgende­r students rights act now has proposed a ballot measure to restrict the restrooms that transgende­r people can use.

Called the Personal Privacy Protection Act, it would require people to “use facilities in accordance with their biological sex” in government- owned buildings, including public schools and universiti­es.

It would not apply to singleoccu­pancy restrooms or to family restrooms.

The proposal would allow people who felt their privacy had been violated by a transgende­r person who entered the restroom unlawfully to sue that individual or the government entity for a minimum of $ 4,000.

It also would allow people who chose not to enter a bathroom or locker room facility because a transgende­r person was inside to file suit.

The proposal was submitted to Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office on Friday by Privacy for All, a coalition that attempted to repeal the state law requiring public schools to allow transgende­r students to use bathrooms and play on sports teams of the gender with which they identify.

The Personal Privacy Protection Act would require more than 365,000 signatures to be placed on the November 2016 ballot, the Sacramento Bee reported.

“We have great compassion for any person that is uncomforta­ble in traditiona­l, sex- separated facilities,” said Gina Gleason, a proponent of the initiative, in a Privacy for All statement circulated by Christian Newswire. “But we also want to protect the privacy that most of us expect when we are in public restrooms, showers and dressing areas.”

Kris Hayashi,

executive director of the Transgende­r Law Center, called the proposed initiative “unconstitu­tional and unenforcea­ble,” saying that it “would dangerousl­y single out California­ns who don’t meet people’s stereotype­s of what it’s like to be male or what it looks like to be female, putting everyone at greater risk of harassment and opening the state up to costly lawsuits.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States