The Mercury News

Recount given the OK in Wisconsin

Second federal judge considers Pennsylvan­ia case

- By Todd Richmond and Maryclaire Dale

PHILADELPH­IA — A federal judge allowed Wisconsin’s presidenti­al recount to move forward Friday as a another federal judge in Pennsylvan­ia planned to take the weekend to decide on a Green Partybacke­d request to recount paper ballots and examine election computer systems for signs of hacking.

U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond in Philadelph­ia said he will rule Monday on the recount bid by Green Party presidenti­al candidate Jill Stein in Pennsylvan­ia, where Republican Donald Trump won, beating Democrat Hillary Clinton by about 44,000 votes.

Stein, who finished far behind Trump and Clinton, is seeking a recount of potentiall­y more than 1 million paper ballots and a forensic examinatio­n of election system software in six large counties, including Philadelph­ia, that use different kinds of paperless electronic voting machines.

Stein’s lawyers argue it’s possible computer hacking occurred in a plot to change the outcome of the election and Pennsylvan­ia’s heavy use of paperless machines make it a prime target. Stein also contends Pennsylvan­ia has erected unconstitu­tional barriers to voters seeking a recount.

“The average voter in Pennsylvan­ia has had to go through incredible lengths in order to have the assurance that their vote is being counted and being counted accurately,” Stein said.

Still, opponents, including Trump and the state attorney general’s office, counter that no such evidence of hacking has been presented and that Stein has no standing to seek a recount because she can’t win the election.

Carnegie Mellon University computer science professor Michael Shamos, who tests voting machines, testified for the Pennsylvan­ia Department of State that the chance of hacking was about as likely as “androids from outer space living among us.”

However, Diamond asked for estimates on how long a partial recount of about 20,000 paper ballots in perhaps a dozen counties and an examinatio­n of the hard drives from a sampling of paperless electronic voting machines might take. A hand recount of the paper ballots in each of the counties could happen over one long day, while examining hard drives might take two days, University of Michigan computer scientist Alex Halderman testified.

Still, Diamond raised concerns about the possibilit­y of disenfranc­hising all 6 million Pennsylvan­ia voters if the election is not certified by Tuesday’s deadline. He scolded Green Party lawyers for their timing: “You sat on your rights for three weeks now ... and now (have caused) a judicial fire drill.”

 ?? SAMANTHA MADAR /JACKSON CITIZEN PATRIOT ?? Michigan residents rally Thursday at the plaza in front of the Michigan State Supreme Court to speak out against the court’s decision to shut down Michigan’s recount.
SAMANTHA MADAR /JACKSON CITIZEN PATRIOT Michigan residents rally Thursday at the plaza in front of the Michigan State Supreme Court to speak out against the court’s decision to shut down Michigan’s recount.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States