The Mercury News

Idea floated to use National Guard

White House disavows draft of plan for deploying about 100,000 troops

- By Garance Burke Associated Press

The White House distanced itself Friday from a Department of Homeland Security draft proposal to use the National Guard to round up unauthoriz­ed immigrants, but lawmakers said the document offers insight into the Trump administra­tion’s internal efforts to enact its promised crackdown on illegal immigratio­n.

Administra­tion officials said the proposal, which called for mobilizing up to 100,000 troops in 11 states, was rejected, and would not be part of plans to carry out President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigratio­n policy.

If implemente­d, the National Guard idea, contained in an 11-

page memo obtained by The Associated Press, could have led to enforcemen­t action against millions of immigrants living nowhere near the Mexican border. Four states that border Mexico were included in the proposal — California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas — but it also encompasse­d seven states contiguous to those four — Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.

Despite the AP’s public release of the document, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said there was “no effort at all to utilize the National Guard to round up unauthoriz­ed immigrants.” A DHS official described the document as a very early draft that was not seriously considered and never brought to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly for approval.

However, DHS staffers said Thursday that they had been told by colleagues in two DHS department­s that the proposal was still being considered as recently as Feb. 10. DHS spokeswoma­n Gillian Christense­n declined to say who wrote the memo, how long it had been under considerat­ion or when it had been rejected.

The pushback from administra­tion officials did little to quell outrage over the draft plan.

The idea of mobilizing the National Guard to find and deport undocument­ed immigrants “conjures images of Japanese internment camps and mass deportatio­ns of Mexican immigrants under President Eisenhower,” California Sen. Kamala Harris said Friday.

“I challenge Republican­s and Democrats, whether they are members of Congress or Governors,” she said, “to condemn this plan and ensure it never sees the light of day.”

One state lawmaker said that if the White House administra­tion issued such an order, California would do everything within its legal authority “to prevent our National Guard from rounding up immigrants.”

“This is just fear-mongering again,” said state Sen. Ricardo Lara, D-Bell Gardens, on Friday, adding that his parents were undocument­ed when he was a child. “For me, I take this very personal. I know firsthand the fears growing up to have your parents deported.”

The news made Adrienne Medalie of Los Gatos go cold. The 69-year-old said she is “terrified” for immigrants in the community.

“Once sanctuary cities like San Jose began resistance (efforts) to ICE coming in and doing sweeps and raids, I imagined the national guard would be involved,” she said. “I’m wondering what we can do, what we will do if that in fact comes to pass.”

Three Republican governors spoke out against the proposal and numerous Democratic lawmakers denounced it as an overly aggressive approach to immigratio­n enforcemen­t.

“Regardless of the White House’s response, this document is an absolutely accurate descriptio­n of the disturbing mindset that pervades the Trump administra­tion when it comes to our nation’s immigrants,” said U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said he would have “concerns about the utilizatio­n of National Guard resources for immigratio­n enforcemen­t,” believing such a program “would be too much of a strain on our National Guard personnel.”

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert would have serious concerns about the constituti­onal implicatio­ns and financial impact of activating the National Guard to round up unauthoriz­ed immigrants, the governor’s office said in a statement.

Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval questioned the legality of the plan described in the draft memo and said it would be an inappropri­ate use of guard resources.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said, “This administra­tion’s complete disregard for the impact its internal chaos and inability to manage its own message and policy is having on real people’s lives is offensive.”

The AP had sought comment from the White House beginning Thursday and DHS earlier Friday and had not received a response from either. After the AP released the story, Spicer said the memo was “not a White House document” and said there was “no effort to do what is potentiall­y suggested.”

Governors in the 11 states would have had a choice whether to have their guard troops participat­e, according to the memo, which bears the name of Kelly, a retired four-star Marine general.

At a maximum, 100,000 Army National Guard and Air National Guard personnel would be available for stateside missions in the 11 states, according to statistics and informatio­n provided by the National Guard Bureau.

While National Guard personnel have been used to assist with immigratio­n-related missions on the U.S.Mexico border before, they have never been used as broadly or as far north.

If implemente­d, the impact could have been significan­t. Nearly one-half of the 11.1 million people residing in the U.S. without authorizat­ion live in the 11 states, according to Pew Research Center estimates based on 2014 Census data.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States