The Mercury News

Trump’s rants may boost his morale, but his woes remain

- By Eugene Robinson Eugene Robinson is a Washington Post columnist.

WASHINGTON — President Trump is flailing like a man who fears he’s about to go under, and he hasn’t even been in office a full month. His instinct is to flee to the warmth and comfort of his political base — but he will learn that while presidents can run, they can’t hide.

Trump’s administra­tion faces two acute, interlocki­ng crises: serious questions about his campaign’s contacts with official and unofficial representa­tives of the Russian government, which U.S. intelligen­ce agencies believe made concerted efforts to help Trump win the election; and appalling levels of dysfunctio­n in the White House that make selfinflic­ted wounds the rule rather than the exception.

The president’s response has been to rant on Twitter and schedule a campaign-style rally Saturday in Florida — all of which may boost Trump’s morale but will do nothing to make his problems go away.

It is unclear whether Trump is trying to fool the nation or fool himself. Witness one of the angry tweets he sent out Thursday morning: “The Democrats had to come up with a story as to why they lost the election, and so badly (306), so they made up a story — RUSSIA. Fake news!”

Let me take a moment to unpack the misinterpr­etations, distortion­s and contradict­ions jammed into those two sentences.

“The Democrats had to come up with a story” refers to Trump’s claim that the Russia allegation­s are nothing more than a tantrum by Democrats upset that Hillary Clinton did not win as they had expected. That is ridiculous. The Democratic Party is focused on rebuilding at the grass-roots level and finding new leadership. Democrats I’ve spoken to have as much criticism as praise for Clinton and the campaign she ran.

Trump’s phrase “they lost the election, and so badly” ignores the facts. Clinton did comfortabl­y win the popular vote, after all. And Trump’s electoral margin was historical­ly quite modest.

The part about how Democrats “made up a story — RUSSIA” is absurd. It was U.S. intelligen­ce agencies, not the Democratic Party or the Clinton campaign, that made the finding that Russia meddled in our election with the aim of boosting Trump’s prospects. If anything, the chief Democrat at the time — former President Obama — reacted too mildly.

And the tweet ends with what has become Trump’s favorite way to dismiss anything he’d rather not hear: “Fake news!” But why would he fire his national security adviser, Michael Flynn, over inauthenti­c news reports? In other Thursday morning tweets, Trump attacked “low-life leakers” in the intelligen­ce community — thus essentiall­y confirming that leaked informatio­n about the Russia connection is genuine, not “fake.” Not even a president can have it both ways.

The idea that Russian President Vladimir Putin played a big role in putting Trump in the White House presents such a grave challenge to our democracy that even reluctant Republican­s in Congress will have to investigat­e. The FBI is already probing reported contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligen­ce officials. We must, and I believe will, learn the truth.

This sort of crisis would test any White House. Based on performanc­e so far, it may drown Trump’s.

Who’s in charge? Chief of Staff Reince Priebus is yet to establish any reasonable sense of order or any effective process for making decisions. Chief strategist Stephen Bannon and senior adviser Stephen Miller constitute a competing power center, and were responsibl­e for the shoddily drafted travel and refugee ban that was blocked by the courts.

Counselor Kellyanne Conway goes on television and speaks confidentl­y for the administra­tion, but increasing­ly is out of the loop — as when she said Trump had “full confidence” in Flynn just hours before his dismissal. Press secretary Sean Spicer struggles daily to reconcile Trump’s pronouncem­ents with objective reality.

No communicat­ions director has been hired. Who would take the job?

Among Trump’s inner circle, only senior adviser Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, seems to be having a relatively positive impact. Yes, this administra­tion has reduced me to applauding nepotism.

Trump claimed Thursday that his administra­tion is running like “a fine-tuned machine.” A test-crash simulator, perhaps?

I guess things could be worse. Don’t ask me how.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States