The Mercury News

Use-of-force cases to get more scrutiny

SJPD’s policy sets new criteria to look closer at a wider array of incidents

- By Robert Salonga rsalonga@bayareanew­sgroup.com

SAN JOSE >> In a groundbrea­king move inspired by public oversight, the San Jose Police Department will step up reviews of officers’ use of force and intensify investigat­ions into the most serious cases, officials announced Tuesday.

Until now, the department only reviewed most nonfatal use-of-force encounters in response to a citizen’s complaint, filed with the department’s Internal Affairs unit or the city’s Office of the Independen­t Police Auditor.

Police supervisor­s and commanders will now be expected to launch force investigat­ions on their own based on reports from the field. Those violent encounters will be graded on a new four-tier scale where a higher risk of injury or death triggers increased scrutiny.

“This is long overdue. We had blind spots. Our policy was too reactive.” — Police chief Eddie Garcia

Chief Eddie Garcia said the policy was crafted in conjunctio­n with the San Jose Police Officers’ Associatio­n to ensure maximum buy-in from his rank-andfile officers amid a national landscape marked by skepticism about police actions in minority communitie­s.

He acknowledg­ed that the department’s practices for reviewing violent incidents needed updating.

“This is long overdue. We had blind spots. Our policy was too reactive,” Garcia said. “This doesn’t mean we’re automatica­lly going to find that (an officer) did something wrong, but we’re going to scrutinize it with a sharper lens.”

Push for more detail

The new policy could affect potentiall­y hundreds of incidents a year in San Jose. A precise number of annual use-of-force incidents was not available from police, because they have not been publicly cataloged by the department since 2009, according to the IPA’s office.

The police auditor’s office has for many years pushed the department to take a more wide-ranging, detailed approach to reviewing cases where officers use force. The IPA’s office contended in its annual audit report released in June that a disturbing number of incidents were escaping sorely needed examinatio­n.

“It appears that of the thousands of use of force incidents that took place between 2010 and 2015, not once did a SJPD supervisor or executive believe that a use of force was questionab­le enough to justify opening an investigat­ion,” the report stated.

Over the past five years, the department has received between 60 and 88 formal complaints per year about officers’ use of force. The department already reviews all officer-involved shootings. There have been eight so far this year in San Jose — the most since 2015, when the city saw a 10-year high of 12. Four of the police shootings in 2017 have been fatal.

Aaron Zisser, San Jose’s new independen­t police auditor, credited the department for embracing one of the highest-profile recommenda­tions made by his predecesso­r, Walter Katz. Zisser said he hopes that the new evaluation will also critique decisions made leading up to force being used.

“There are genuine questions still on how the police department is going to look at de-escalation,” Zisser said.

Garcia acknowledg­ed the possibilit­y that the increased attention could lead to more officers being reprimande­d in use-of-force cases. However, he also noted that the awareness of the new policy could lead to officers becoming more creative and adept at finding less-violent solutions to physical conflicts on the street.

“All we’re trying to tell our officers is, when you have time, to come up with a plan,” he said. “We are trying to be more progressiv­e, but we also want to ensure that we’re not stymieing proactivit­y by forcing this down our officers’ throats. Being proactive, and being fair and just, are not mutually exclusive.”

But Zisser noted that other large agencies that have taken such steps — like Oakland police and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department — have done so under heavy criticism or an order from a federal judge.

“The fact (SJPD) did this on its own without that pressure, that is progressiv­e and positive. It’s worthy of praise,” Zisser said. “I look forward to seeing how the new policy plays out and, along with Chief Garcia, examining whether further changes are needed.”

Kudos for policy

Mayor Sam Liccardo lauded the new policy, which he said was vital to improving and maintainin­g credibilit­y in the city’s neighborho­ods.

“This new policy serves as the latest example of our collective commitment to ensuring that the San Jose Police Department remains a model for accountabi­lity and community trust,” Liccardo said in a statement.

Local civil-rights groups were heartened by Tuesday’s announceme­nt. Derrick Sanderlin, a leader in the faith-based coalition People Acting in Community Together, said the new policy is precisely why community members want the IPA office to expand its oversight.

“It’s a fantastic step in the right direction,” Sanderlin said.

Sanderlin hopes that more community input will be considered for future policy revisions that affect many of the people his group represents.

“Only when the police department works with the community does it work effectivel­y,” he said. “And a lot of us from the community want more.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States